[Sharing Lights]

continued from the above:





First of all, why do you (HenryBowman) keep imposing angels toward the Sun?

Why can't light of the Sun be viewed as a wave of photons as science proved it?
Then, you can bring angels but why before?

I recognize science and so do billions of people on Earth.

Why do you try so hard to make us aware of, Satan, as I assume you implied him/her in your quest to oppose the sunlight the way I referred to it.

Why the concept of the Sun and what it brings to life and people is associated in your version of the defending God, as the Sun appears as being brought into the concept of Satan by you?

You scare me.
Not personally but as your ways remind me...

Do you realize that you help many, who search for Higher Truth to be averted from anything what has to do with God in your quest for defending God against those (like I) who dared to share with all who care to know that the Sun can provide the key to Higher Awareness as an object available to all?

They may associate God and your defenses of Him as making no sense dogmas.

They may think, "if God is relying on such defenders, I do not wish to have anything to do with him/her."

I use spiritual concepts, but not at the expense of science!

I do not doubt for a moment that both compliment each other and do not oppose.

You seem to oppose the scientific facts of Sun-human interaction and it being the source of life on Earth.

I do not know if you see Angels, Satan or talk to God but I know for a fact that many people see and feel the Sun everyday and do not have such experience with the former.

Beware the "angel" of "light" folks. All that glimmers is not gold.

Full alert - people, code orange and even more - I proclaim code - orange juice.

The Satan is, probably I,
as I defy the God's defenders
and dare to speak of the Sun, what it does, and can do for humanity.

Are you sure that God needs your defense and if it is indeed a defense of him, would it not only turn off even more people?

As per

All that glimmers is not gold

,

please re-read that phrase after the extensive copy/paste activity so diligently exhibited by you.

Again, this is contrary to the Word.

Job 33:4
"The spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life."

Who did tell you that Sun has nothing of God/Universe.
You can read just of God if Universe bothers you.
I am consistent in both.

Psalm 18:28
For thou wilt light my candle:

Again reference to light, you keep proving my side more and more.

the LORD my God will enlighten my darkness.

Again, you only prove my notions as "enlighten' means to become full of light.

Is that not a property of the Sun?


Light is the property of fire, star, Sun - anyway you like to refer to it, if you are capable of understanding basic concepts of science.

If you deny science and refuse it,
oh, well, keep qouting...and defending, God knows, what and whom?

By the way, there is nothing wrong with the messages in the quotations you used.
It is how you pervert them is the issue.

I state that neither you represent the authors nor their spirit.

Please represent yourself as that would be more suitable by all rules of fair conduct.

If respond, please do not overload the Web space with more quotations and your, version of what and how they mean, all of which has been manipulated by you as you have done already.

Instead of copy/paste, please write your, own thoughts and speak for yourself for a change.


If you believe that I was a bit harsh, then, please consider the deceit you used all the way above of the post as it fell all the way below...

I would, always, oppose deceit; yet, fairly.

You have received exactly what provoked; yet I have not used your tactics but remained honest and, if noticed replied myself, as do not hide behind the angels and apostles or their quotations.

Sharing Light

PS. If the word "Light" is associated in your opinion of the defender of God as related to Satan, I do not mind you calling me such as I stand by the "Light" fully.
I believe, reasonably, sharing is better than being selfish.

I did not call you "selfish" - I only referred to "sharing," as the opposite of former.