[Sharing Lights]

Part I

.............................

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

Matthew 10:

24The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. 25It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?
26Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

1) I believe you read reasonably well.

It is beyond any doubt, that

2) I, reasonably, requested of you
to use a protocol of a reasonable and intelligent debate

that such people can use,
when they have something to say/write by substance.

3) In order to avoid any confusion,
I have specifically, spelled out,
based on common sense
that, a reasonable and intelligent debate

i.e. basic logic and common sense

involve more than active copy/paste activity.

Your percentage of copying/pasting vs. own writing, can outperform such efficient copy centers as Staples and Kinkos.


4) That is, even more, relevant

when parts of religious writings are copied by the people who not only do not "represent" the truly noble authors of the original writings but pervert them.

If the word "represent" bothers you,
change it in your mind with what doesn't bother you
as long as the original meaning is intact.

I believe my thought is simple enough as well before I get a lengthy tirade back on that.

5) I, even, fairly posted the actual quotations of your, relevant posts next to what you either accused me of or falsely stated I said or wrote.

6)

Any one who could read, could, clearly see that what I wrote and what you claimed I wrote did not match.

7) As the above was done by you consistently and, I, equally, consistently, asked you, to use honest and fair means of communications, there is can be no "bona fide" error on your part.

8) I do not jump to conclusion prematurely before re-reading both sides.

I have enough posts and misrepresentations and selectively chosen fallacies coming from you to see that such are you ways when you can not debate without lies and deceit.


9) Even though, I could see the above, reasonably, early, I felt obligated to address the tactics as:

a) I have a right to oppose lies and deceit vs. anyone against whom they are used.

b) I showed all readers (who care to see the facts on their own by simply reading and discerning)
how lies and deceit are used and how they can be revealed by evidence.

Our experience may help them to be better prepared for what they may encounter in Courts as, there, lies and deceit, fly in formations.

c) I, also, via your courtesy, may have helped to illustrate how religious dogmas are forced and manipulated by the people of the compatible agendas.

10) I have a very clear separation between such hypocrisy and manipulations that the above has exhibited persistent during the history of humanity and the true and truly, spiritual religion which is the highest form of human expression in my opinion.

11)

The latter is never based on deceit, lies and robotic copy/paste.

It is based on deep, personal understanding
and ability to express anything based on virtues, morals, and true faith, being unveiled harmoniously and by substance.

May all readers discerning their own what you have unveiled and so consistently.


I trust their, such ability, as I have done my part more than enough and the rest is, redundant.


12) Therefore your tactics did provide some value to many,
as, I am sure, many of us, have to witness
such outbursts as you provided
under the veil of defending God
or law or a personal opinion posed as, almost, life itself.


This is a common every day reality and those of us who face it;
and we have to be able to deal with it directly.


I did try in good faith to have a debate to be available to all as I cherish freedom of choice, even though all could read that the began thread has nothing to do with your religious dogmas as it has been called,

"how to predict your future."

You responded in bad faith, as lies and deceit are such.

On top of that you were hiding behind true faith.

Mutually exclusive acts imply what they imply.

13) My life experience tells me that you failed to,
remain on the original subject of the Thread, not so much on purpose,

(I am trying to be fair at all times to all even when the person is not fair to me,)

but, you held a personal grudge against me for addressing your fallacies earlier in another post.

As why else would you switch the original thread to another one in the same thread?

Another contradiction.

As soon as an opportunity presented itself, you acted up on it.

14) My thread or a name of it, would have not made any difference to you,
as your Ego demanded the combat
to show the World
"how dare I question or oppose you?"

The more lies are thrown vs. me the better and deeper I would respond.

This way, the same, dirty tactics would not be used against others as honest means are adequate to debate anything and I state so fully!

Ii never bluff.

15) Yes, I repeat, it is scary, not personally, no matter how much you try to twist my message, but,

it is scary and sad "how and what" has been done in the name of God.

Can you , imagine, readers, when the "defenders of God" gain certain controls and means to implement them?

Look at the lessons of history...

16) How many infidels and those who simply dared to disagree with them were imprisoned, tortured, and burned?

17) The name of the religion didn't matter, as

they all used the same tactics.

18) Religious fanaticism, as any, fanaticism, can only lead to the same conduct.