[Sharing Lights]

..............
aksis: Sharing Lights,

I liked the first post, it was a good explination of the workings of "reaping what we have sewn"/"karmic reprecusions" ~ amoung other things.

What's Satan? I never mentioned it? Could you elaborate on that? Specifically what Satan is? I am compleatly ignorant...


How are you?

References to Satan and Antichrist were done by Henry Bowman who is so busy copying/pasting Psalms as if can't answer on his own.

When my replies were posted, they reflected your and his posts accordingly.
No one is responsible for another.

All know who wrote what and when; therefore, all of us are responsible for our parts only.




Where is the Mother/Daughter?!?!?! Umm, isn't this exactly what you have been discorsing about? Did I need to mention what you have? Was that comment even directed to you?


Anytime the combo Father/Son mentioned, as is it is, a travesty and misrepresentation.

There can be no Son at all if there no interaction between masculine and feminine principles.

As there can be a Son in the process, there can be a Daughter.

Feminie is not any less important than masculine.

When one talks of the Spirit, it is a travesty and misrepresentation no to talk of Matter or Form.

Anytime only one half is presented, that is half truth only.

This concept refers to the Above and Below equally.

The Law of Polarization is Eternal.

Practically everything on complex level is polarized.

Even in our Solar system, the Sun represent the Spirit or moving forth Force and the Earth represents the Form or Matter, which received the light and warmth (the product of light.)

Once the Light (Spirit) impregnates the Earth (Matter/Form) Life is the Child.

As there many forms of Life, some are more of masculine. some more of Feminine nature, thus, Sons and Daughters...


Have I not expressed this principle previously: Spirit (Father) + Matter(Mother) = God = Alpha & Omega = Universe = All

Yet in Light of this, you persist that I am missing the "big picture"? Sounds like you are expressing to your "reflection", from my perspective...


The Law of Polarity is a basic Principle of Existence and has nothing to do with me.

You have yet to elaborat on Spirit and I felt as if you were disregarding it & attempting to replace this with sunlight, which, like sunlight, is permiating everything, yet, is not sunlight.


As you simply search and miss some parts in the process, it i snot the same as HB openly misrepresented what I wrote.


I like all can see the difference right away in the above.
Your intentions seem to be - to complete the picture, as you see it.
That is understandable.

I would reply that, I believe you misunderstood me.

I never replace one with another, as that can't work.

Our Sun does not replace the Principle of Spirit and I have never written so.

Iif you re-read the Posts, you would see the proof.

The Sun represents to humanity the closest, visible manifestation of the Spirit but only in the degree the former can encompass or represent the latter.

Your and mine physical Father on Earth, represent the Spirit and even, some Authority of God/Universe to you and me and all (their Father.)

Once again, it is true only in the degree that is represented.

The same is true for Mothers.

Furthermore, my goal and I do not hide it is to share knowledge with all - not only with religious believers.

I respect all equally based on their merit.

There would be Posts where I would have to venture into the depth of Spirituality but, before that, I try not to drive the purely scientific community away.

I try to look ahead when write ad not get caught in the proximity of the rhetorics only.




Sunlight is a corser/cruder form of Spirit. You appear to me to have confused the sun & sunlight, (part of manifestation/Mother principle) with Spirit (Father Principle). Prehaps you were getting there... I am waiting, in the other thread, to see....


Beautiful, you are right: the Sun and its sunlight are not the same.

There is another Higher Law which states that polarization can occur on subsequent levels and relativity is at play.

Another word, to our Earth, the Sun represents the Spirit.

When we look further at the concept of the Sun as a polarized entity, we can divide it further into light, fire, and heat.
Thus, we get sublevels.

There is another concept of the "Black Sun" but we would leave it alone for now.

I would ask you for the sake of concentration,

Questions:

1) which is masculine and which is feminine principle?

Answer only if like of course.
Providing answers if great but making readers search is even better.

2) which appears in which order: light, fire, heat?


My comment in the other thread about the old saying "Don't worship the Morning Star", and, such sayings as this, had nothing to do with Satan/Lucifer. It was not my intention to get you mislabled, nor did I label you thusly or even imply it.


Satan was brought in by HB.
He implied I wa it, then brough in Antichrist.
You have to ask him, which one I am now, as it i snt fair for me to anwser on his behalf as he did for me

The Sun is not worshiped.
It is the entity that made us all through the entity that created the Sun.
To us, thus, the Sun is the closest, before we can relate to the Higher Force.


This guidance was given, to people who were confusing the Sun/Sunlight with the Spirit/Father Principle, when someone used the medaphore of the Sun to explain an aspect of God. I was simply clarifing the similarities and the subtle distinction between the 2 and offering the essance of why the age old saying was given in the first place, and, using the threads prolepsis as the example. It didn't even have anything to do with you at first. Also, a desire to prevent people from being mislead. You appeared lost in the medaphor...


I believe your intentions and that reading and writing posts would clarify enough as time goes by.

Prehaps if I used the words "string theory" rather then "Spirit"? Shall I also do a dance while you work the music box?

Reread your own comment if like, particularly the last sentence.
You begin implying and not accurately.





Nether do I, yet a lot of the science minded people, who believe themselves to be evolved monkies, seem to have a hard time grasping the sovereignty principle (that we are each sovereign and none more then another) & cling to the Alpha Male perceptions that come from mimicing animals. The whole Might is Right trip... etc.


We did evolve not only from what you call monkeys, we evolve from single cells all te way to us.

Look at the Embryo chart I posted earlier.
We repeat all the stages of the Evolution as we went through it.



As I do not like assuming unless that is based on the obvious, I would rather ask you,

Questions:

1) How did human appear on Earth in your opinion?

2) Did they come on Earth as thee are now?

3) From where?

4) Do you deny the Evolution on Earth?

I can ask many questions.
I only wish to be fair to all, so you pick and choose or rephrase, just please stay on the subject.

I am not implying that you are that kind of science mind/ego, nor am I of a mind that is in complete disagreement with science... yet there are way to many flawed theories in science for me to say I agree with it entirly... just a different kind of doggma as far as I am concerned.

Quite often, yes.

Question: Meanwhile what is the theory you believe in, regarding humans as they appeared on Earth?

As, below, you only refer to HB, in order to be fair to him, I would not engage what was directed to him.
***

HeneryBowman,

Since you won't argue that the Father is omnipresent, what part of "within you" did you think I was referring to? Your brain/ego? Is God not permiating your brain matter? Could God influance your ego?

***

Politician: How do we make these citizens complant?

Religious Zelot: Have you tried burning them at the stake or a hot poker in the eye, prehaps better stories of hell?

Science Zelot: Naw, just send them to a mental hospital and use shock therapy, and, if that fails, we do a labotomy... its more humaim & less of a mess. Plus you can bill the insurance company twice & then there is the long term care perks & a new test subject...


Politician: Good ideas, glad I thought of them: