[Sharing Lights]

Dear Aksis!

Yes, the discussion is turning in a venue worthy of an intelligent debate now.

I thank you for making those efforts as, they, only showed that my, inner perception that your intentions are sincere and you search more than defend ego were reasonable.

The direction and effort are the most important thing, as the rest woud follow.


I would address your reply in the evening as they deserve
not less time than you invested in your answers.

You thought and searched - and spoke your mind and not as HB could manage

"I cannot answer that, as I was not there. I could answer what I believe, but that is not the question you directed to me."

Thank you again.



As for Henry Bowman....


I did ask you questions sincerely.

Look what you showed all.


You could not answer,
you evaded,
you "replied as you replied" (that phrase is self-evident, so I save all time...)

Yet, you laughed, you judged,
which means you had your judgments based on
something fundamental to you and what appeared as
solid via your views, presented as facts.


Yet, when it came to bringing those facts and fundamental beliefs
cemented by rational of answers,
all of the above appeared thinner than bubbles.

At, least, you laughed.
Good.


A bit of probing deeper revealed...


I would politely decline further comments here,
as, I never go for the "jugular," unless provoked.


Few points that are needed to be answered would be answered, nevertheless, later.