[Sharing Lights]

aksis: I will address this from the science community, and then from my own prespective:

Haeckel's theory has been denounced by the science community, (embryologist, Dr. Michael Richardson & biologists from around the world), long ago. And his drawings were described as "fradulent", "must have come from his imagination" and "should no longer be used to support the evolutionists' claims that [the] embryos are similar...".

I do not talk of Haeckel's theory,
I do not talk of his drawings,

I talk of proved, photos and actual images of human embryos and their development in the womb.


All states are clearly seen and, whatever one may believe in has nothing to do with the astounding details of all the stages visible in human embryos.

Still in the science scope and transisting into my prespective; I agree that the body started as a single cell. Obviously the DNA of that single cell, and the DNA from these other animals are not even close to the same.

OK, we do talk science now and the genetic code is real.
As embryos develop, the cells divide more and more complex levels of development is revealed.

Finaly, I would question: When one looks at a Being (Soul|Body) that is created in the Image and Likeness of the All, what couldn't you see?

Deep question: a bit ambiguous, but I believe I understand the meaning of it.


We, humans, posses all the "apparatuses" that Universe/nature has.

Not everything in us is visible as we are much more than the crude, physical layer.

If there was an equipment allowing to see all the levels of vibrations emitted from humans, one may conclude that they encompass most major Universe's/nature's phenomenas.

As God/Universe are the one and same, we are created in the image of the forces that created us.