[Sharing Lights]

http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/v...asc&s tart=84


A proof of coward-like conduct is at the link above,
as it is cowardly locked so that no one can reply.

That's all they can manage.

Not much, then, not much.

I came across the comments bellows, which I would
address by substance and facts as I only use fair ways.


Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica

Oh good lord. Now the freaks are writing bad poetry.

Demosthenes!

You have refused to engage me fairly.
You refused to reply to me personally.
You chose to decline an equal debate.
Yet, you called me a freak.

Since, you cannot, possibly, make any discernment
on my freakishness, claimed by you without
finding through first-hand experience,
the logic dictates that you are a
coward and a bully, who can, only, attempt
insulting people ( you did vs. Heidi and David who are
descent people, act fairly, and mean, truly, well!) and
refuse to face them and me on equal terms.

An ability to utilize Grey matter is highly questioned,
then, in your case as you defy logic.

I cannot call you a freak back, as; I have not
experienced such quality in you.

Therefore, I have to be honest.

I can call you what I have experienced

a) read personally
and put next to

b) logic and

c) facts

- a, truly, fair triple test.

Basic a,b,c.

Reasonable people who witness your acts, can call you,
though, (allegation) a bullying liar and a
coward that is true in the light of the
above but not more than that,
unless we gain more evidence.

I have proof to the above allegation,
but what I do not have proof against,
I have no right to state.

We can prove you lie, we can prove you act as a
coward based on your writings vs. Sui Juries members,

I never altered a word you wrote and never will.

Next,

what you call bad poetry
is something that caught your attention, obviously, and
caused some discomfort.

And, yes, obviously, you linger at our Forum, as why
would you post a part of my poetry on your website?

How can you obtain it, otherwise?

You are so uncomfortable
facing those who use precise logic and Principles
because they are destroyers of lies and deceit.

You still refused to face me so you hide behind the
words that comfort you - “bad poetry.”

Well, keep clinging to your comfort zone, then.

Quote:
To Demosthenes!

The Grand, the Keeper,
I don't know where is your beeper
or phone or pen,
I simply, ask you - "when, precious, when?"

I offered you - "reveal who you are,"
I know you are close, as you are not far.
Engage me at our - Forum/Website.
I guaranteed you to preserve you the Right.
No editing, altering - nothing you did.
"One on one," again I repeat.

Demosthenes: Is Sharing Lights a moderator?
Can he/she/it make such a promise?
Someone should tell her/him/it that
I've been banned from the forum.

What a cheap shot.

Even, if you were banned under your, current nickname,
who stopped you from registering under another one?

You just do not feel comfortable facing those
who can face you.

That’s all to it.

You could use another nickname
and let me know who you are.

You should have enough Grey matter to figure that out
if figured out how to insult Sui Juries.

Therefore, you simply acted as a coward you may be.

Demosthenes: I didn't give myself the Esoterica title,
dumb dumb, one of the other moderators
(probably Joey) did.
The titles are humor, oh humorless one.

Another cheap shot.

Are you saying that
“Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica”

could not be edited by you and you are stuck with that?

Common,
what kind of logic is that?

You are not very logical by all standards.

Note, I do not call you names, I only use pure logic.

Joey Smith
Infidel Enslaver


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 4125 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:11 pm Post subject:

Congratulations, Joey!

How many did you enslave?

Were you sleeping or that was in your, usual awoken state?

Any one who chooses a nickname with the word
"enslaver" is....

well...
may all people discern for themselves
on moral qualities of such

Infidel
or
Enslaver
or
whoever...


So you chose "Infidel Enslaver" -

... how impressive....


So you may envision "enslaving..."

I bet a jackal twitches his paws in a sleep, as well,
dreaming or envisioning that lions obey jackal's commands.

I can imagine how quickly the same jackal runs
on all four when a lion is close, only to bark-"command" "bravely"
from a safe distance.

Infidel Enslaver, I did not call you a jackal
if some barking may come out of you.


It is enough that you may have made a fool of yourself with your noble nickname, "Infidel Enslaver."

Congratulations, by the way,
on your dreams of enslavement.

Joey Smith: "Sharing Lights" is on one llllllooooonnnnnggggg LSD trip.

Another artist woke up.
What did you paint today?


Bright and vivid colors of imaginary enslavement?
Keep on dreaming, keep on painting.


Joey Smith, Infidel Enslaver, you are welcomed and encouraged to come
to SuiJuris and state what evidence you have that I am
on LSD trip.

As I have never been on it, you are a liar.


I used only facts and logic once again, mr. Liar.

Before you pass your, wise comments,

Infidel Enslaver,

debate a person
first if have any guts, then, arrive to conclusions.

If you do not have guts, it is, definitely, not easy to arrive to logical conclusions.

I guess you could not master much if LSD
was your only argument?

Not much at all!

Skeptic
Knight Commander of the Twelfth Elu


Joined: 01 Jan 2003
Posts: 2231 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:35 pm Post subject:

Quote:
I know you are close, as you are not far.

Skeptic:Amazingly, a Sui Juris poster managed
to write a logically valid claim.

Another sign of wisdom unveiled.

This one imagines commanding Knights as if he acts as
one or could ever face them?

If it is amazing to you, Skeptic
Knight Commander of the Twelfth Elu,
that Sui Juris Forum, which is, NO 1
Forum, regarding the free,
law related matters and some othersis illogical to you,

reasonable persons may, safely, conclude that
something is wrong with your "logic."

My statement is logical.

Try to read it impartially, then you would realize that.


What and how is not fair of me to state but the above
seems to be true and accurate, nevertheless.

I have not, yet, seen one valid and logical debate vs. any
Sui Juries, except cheap shots.
Not one!

You guys are failing in 100% percent ratio.

That is more than embarrassing.

That is, even, pathetic if you ever wish
to have some credibility.

Decency and principles are not the terms
that may be applied to you, indeed.

Keep on swimming in your, own lies if that
is comfortable to you.
Why not?


If ever gain some hint of guts, prove your logical abilities
here, as I have challenged all of you - unprincipled ones.

You can manage, only, locking your thread instead on your site and
write cheap nonsense vs. Heidi and David.


I believe you are bunch of bullies and cowards based on
your acts on record.


PS. I am sure you would read this and out threads are not locked,
"LSD commanders and chiefs."