[Sharing Lights]

Another portion of this same method consists of defaming or
degrading the individual whose loyalties are to be changed to the target
of his loyalties, i.e., his superiors or government, to such a degree
that this target, at length, actually does hold the individual in disrepute,
and so does rebuff him and serve to convince him
that his loy-alties have been misplaced. These are the milder methods, but have
proven extremely effective. The greatest drawback in their practice
is that they require study and concentration, the manufacture of false
evidence, and a psychopolitical operator’s time.
In moments of expediency, of which there are many, the personality
itself can be rearranged by shock, surgery, duress, privation, and
in particular, that best of psychopolitical techniques, implantation,
using the technologies of neo-hypnotism. Such duress must have in
its first phase a defamation of the loyalties, and in its second, the
implantation of new loyalties. A good and experienced psychopolitical
operator, working under the most favorable circumstances, can,
by the use of psychopolitical technologies, alter the loyalties of an
individual so deftly that his own companions will not suspect that
they have changed. This, however, requires considerably more
finesse than is usually required by the situation. Mass neo-hypnotism
can accomplish more or less the same results when guided by an
experienced psychopolitical operator. An end goal in such a procedure
would be the alteration of the loyalties of an entire nation in a
short period of time by mass neo-hypnotism, a thing that has been
effectively accomplished among the less usable states of Russia.
It is obvious that loyalty is entirely lacking in that mythical commodity
known as "spiritual quality." Loyalty is entirely a thing of
dependence, economic or mental, and can be changed by the crudest
implementations. Observation of workers in their factories or fields
demonstrates that they easily grant loyalty to a foreman or a woman,
and then as easily abandon it and substitute another individual,
shunning the person to whom loyalty was first granted. The queasy
insecurity of the masses in Capitalistic nations accounts for this condition
being more common in those states than it is in an enlightened
State such as Russia. In Capitalistic states, dependencies are so
craven, wants and privations are so exaggerated, that loyalty is
entirely without ethical foundation and exists only in the realm of
dependency, duress, or demand.
It is fortunate that communism so truly approaches an ideal state
of mind, for this brings a certain easiness into any changing of loyalties,
since all other philosophies extant and practiced on Earth today
are degraded and debased, compared to communism.