Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ice
You are mixing two different processes. What do you think is the difference between "Administrative" and "Judicial"?? Each one has its own procedures. If you think you are dealing with an "Administrative" court... then by all means ... go ahead... do what you think is right.
But remember this: The court can change its face in an instant. Are you sure it's going to be an Administrative court when you refuse that document? hmmm.... maybe you better go there and find out just what kind of court you're dealing with.
|
Okay. Thank you for pointing that out, Ice. I was under the perhaps mistaken impression that all judges/magistrates today are working on an administrative level (except for Article III judges).
I was jailed for "contempt" which was a dishonoring of their presentment. The fact that I didn't receive their presentment apparently doesn't matter. They "claim" it was served. Isn't that administrative? How does one determine what level the playing field is on? It is "District Court" which I am also perhaps mistakenly assuming is Federal Amiralty/Maritime court, since the "judge" said the nature of the law there was "statuatory". Not to mention it's a federal long arm procedure, i.e., UIFSA, that they are using to cross State lines to enforce their "draft."
What do you think?
Peace,
goldphoenix