[Sharing Lights]

He need only take unto himself a sufficiently
savage role, a sufficiently uncompromising inhuman attitude,
and he will be obeyed and believed.
The subject of hypnotism is a subject of belief. What can people be
made to believe? They can be made to believe anything that is
administered to them with sufficient brutality and force. The obedience
of a populace is as good as their belief in their leaders.
Despicable religions, such as Christianity, know this. They know
that if enough faith can be brought into being, a populace can be
enslaved by the Christian mockeries of humanity and mercy, and
thus can be disarmed. But one need not count upon this act of faith
to bring about a broad belief. One must only exhibit enough force,
enough inhumanity, enough brutality and savageness to create
implicit belief and therefore and thereby implicit obedience. As communism
is a matter of belief, its study is a study of force.
The earliest Russian psychiatrists pioneering this science of psychiatry
understood thoroughly that hypnosis is induced by shock of
an emotional nature, and also by extreme privation, as well as by
blows and drugs.
In order to induce a deep state of hypnosis in an individual, a
group, or a population, an element of terror must always be present
on the part of those who would govern. The psychiatrist is aptly
suited to this role, for his brutalities are committed in the name of science
and are inexplicably complex, and entirely out of view of the
human understanding. A sufficient popular terror of the psychiatrist
will, in itself, bring about insanity on the part of many individuals.
A psychopolitical operative should at all times insist that these treatments
are therapeutic and necessary. He can, in all of his literature
and his books, list large numbers of pretended cures by these means.
But these "cures" need not actually produce any recovery from a state
of disturbance. As long as the psychopolitical operative or his dupes
are the only authorities as to the difference between sanity and insanity,
their word as to the therapeutic value of such treatment will be
the final word. No layman would dare venture to pronounce judgment
upon the state of sanity of an individual whom the psychiatrist
has already declared insane. The individual, himself, is unable to
complain, and his family, as will be covered later, is already discredited
by the occurrence of insanity in their midst.

There must be no
other adjudicators of insanity; otherwise it could be
disclosed that the brutalities practiced in the name of treatment are not therapeutic.
A psychopolitical operative has no interest in "therapeutic means"
or "cures". The greater the number of insane in the country where he
is operating, the larger the number of the populace coming under his
view, the greater will become his facilities. Because the problem is
a p p a rently mounting to uncontrollable heights, he can operate
increasingly in an atmosphere of emergency, which again excuses his
use of such treatments as electric shock, the prefrontal lobotomy,
transorbital leucotomy, and other operations long since practiced in
Russia on political prisoners.
It is in the interest of the psychopolitical operative that the possibility
of curing the insane be outlawed and ruled out at all times. For
the sake of obedience on the part of the population and their general
reaction, a level of brutality must, at all costs, be maintained. Only in
this way can the absolute judgment of the psychopolitical operative
as to the sanity or insanity of public figures be maintained without
fear of contradiction. Using sufficient brutality upon their patients,
the public at large will come to believe utterly anything they say
about their patients. Furthermore, and much more important, the
field of the mind must be sufficiently dominated by the psychopolitical
operative, so that wherever tenets of the mind are taught they
will be hypnotically believed. The psychopolitical operative, having
under his control all psychology classes in an area, can thus bring
about a complete reformation of the future leaders of a country
through their educational processes, and so prepare them for communism.