Thread: Brainwashing
View Single Post
  #49  
Old 07-19-2006, 10:24 PM
Sharing Lights's Avatar
Sharing Lights Sharing Lights is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Republic of NY & Sovereignty that was meant & shall be!
Posts: 6,486

Philosophy


Marx's philosophy hinges on his view of human nature. Along with the Hegelian dialectic, Marx inherited a disdain for the notion of an underlying invariant human nature. Sometimes Marxists express their views by contrasting “nature” with “history”. Sometimes they use the phrase “existence precedes consciousness”. The point, in either case, is that who a person is, is determined by where and when he is — social context takes precedence over innate behavior; or, in other words, one of the main features of human nature is adaptability. Nevertheless, Marxian thought rests on the fundamental assumption that it is human nature to transform nature, and he calls this process of transformation "labour " and the capacity to transform nature labour power. For Marx, this is a natural capacity for a physical activity, but it is intimately tied to the active role of human consciousness:

A spider conducts operations that resemble those of a weaver, and a bee puts to shame many an architect in the construction of her cells. But what distinguishes the worst architect from the best of bees is this, that the architect raises his structure in imagination before he erects it in reality. (Capital, Vol. I, Chap. 7, Pt. 1)
Marx did not believe that all people worked the same way, or that how one works is entirely personal and individual. Instead, he argued that work is a social activity and that the conditions and forms under and through which people work are socially determined and change over time.

Marx's analysis of history is based on his distinction between the means / forces of production, literally those things, such as land, natural resources, and technology, that are necessary for the production of material goods, and the relations of production, in other words, the social and technical relationships people enter into as they acquire and use the means of production. Together these comprise the mode of production; Marx observed that within any given society the mode of production changes, and that European societies had progressed from a feudal mode of production to a capitalist mode of production. In general, Marx believed that the means of production change more rapidly than the relations of production (for example, we develop a new technology, such as the Internet, and only later do we develop laws to regulate that technology). For Marx this mismatch between (economic) base and (social) superstructure is a major source of social disruption and conflict.
__________________
Click on: Disclaimer

Sacred Triangle: Believe/Learn/Accomplish.
Foundation: is the Virtues.
Result: re-discover your,
Higher Self,

connecting
- Above & Below -
Past & Future
Fulfilling Your Destiny!


- Sovereignty, Strength, & Tolerance
In order to preserve accuracy,
my writing(s) may be re-posted unedited
& in context only!

All Rights & Liberties Reserved
Without Prejudice
Objecting forced label - "Come & Get Some!"
Reply With Quote