[Sharing Lights]

Part I

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights but is quoted by HB only by part;
thus - incomplete.

See the actual and complete quote below! (*)

Version b)

HenryBowman:
Doesn't this disagree with "evolution?"

Nonetheless, you have contributed nice work in this thread.

==========================================
(*)

Version a)
"Sharing Lights: With years, as we become older, that formation,
mutates slowly but surely.

Each new copy is less perfect than the previous one."

==========================================


Are both versions: b)
and my a) - equal?

Which is accurate - mine as almost whole (closer to being completed)
or the presented one - by one part only and uncompleted?


My reply, concerns the issue of
accurate or inaccurate reference to the data/concept,
as that may affect considerable numbers of people.

That may refer to any subject, in any field
and to anyone.

As the bulk of the information on this Forum revolves
around law and people's rights, it is crucial
to be precise in any argument or reference
in Court or off-Court.As, we know, not much honesty can be expected
in the Courts' system , as it is run, mostly,
by not such, honest people, to start with.

Can you imagine how those individuals,
holding power and authority would jump on your case,
when you exhibit inaccuracies and fallacies?

These people would do so, even, in your
perfect arguments.

Yet, there you have truth on your side.

In fallacies and gross misconceptions,
you have nothing but
two alleys going for your throat:

1) the corrupt judges-lawyers and your,

2) own demise due to the above combination.


==========================================
Now, straight to the actual example, which
triggered this reply of the original subject.

In Brief:

The rules of logic dictate
reference to the idea - not a part of it.

An idea contains the sum of all of its parts.

If only one is chosen (arbitrarily,)
then the idea is altered and misrepresented.

When you have an allegation from a judge or lawyer,
or from any one, for that matter,
you have to refer to the comment/allegation
by the former and examine how that applies
to your idea.

In this example, the following has occurred:

"Each new copy is less perfect than the previous one."
Doesn't this disagree with "evolution?"

1) Was the statement copied from my Post:
Yes!

2) Is it copied accurately?
Yes!

3) Did 1) and 2) as they are, preserve, my idea,
which is simple and direct?

Absolutely not!

On the contrary, the question posted was selected
or manipulated to refer to only a part of the idea.


That becomes self evident, once I quote the idea,
itself, as, basically, the other phrase, being
of not any less importance has been,
deliberately, omitted.

Here is what should have been copied if any,
accuracy and fairness to be preserved.

With years, as we become older, that formation,
mutates slowly but surely.

Each new copy is less perfect than the previous one.

4) Does that make a difference?
Of course, it does!

Now, it conveys the idea - not some 50% of it.

Is any idea or concept whole or partial?
The answer is self-evident.

This logic is Universal, once again, and can and
should be applied in any matter, if we, ever,
wish to have success in anything.

Doesn't this disagree with "evolution?"

(as pertaining to the above.)

Answer:

When only 1) is selectively chosen, it may disagree
with anything at all, as a partial statement has no merit,
in Court or off-Court!

Only, when the statements, comprising an idea
and referred to such, become whole (or reasonably
close to that if the idea is a more complex one.)

Furthermore:

(*)

With years, as we become older, that formation,
mutates slowly but surely.

"Each new copy is less perfect than the previous one."

That, as is, clearly, conveys the concept that,
with years, as we become older,
which is a reality of life:

all organisms go through a sine wave-like cycle.

How many cycles there are is not in discussion
at this time.




sine wave

The sine wave or sinusoid is a function that occurs
often in mathematics, signal processing, and other
fields. Its most basic form is:




which describes a wavelike function of time () with:


peak deviation from center = (aka amplitude)

angular frequency (radians per second)

initial phase (t=0) =

is also referred to as a phase shift. E.g., when the
initial phase is negative, the entire waveform is shifted
toward future time (i.e. delayed).
The amount of delay, in seconds, is .

Electronics
sine wave

Wave whose amplitude is the sine of a linear function
of time.
It is plotted on a graph that plots amplitude
against time or radial degrees relative
to the angular rotation of an alternator.


Evolution and life, often, develop as a sine wave
with tis peaks and plunges, only to rise again.

Their resilience is astounding as, even, death, itself,
can not conquer it and the cycles continue.