View Single Post
  #15  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:47 PM
Ice's Avatar
Ice Ice is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
First of all...

Any contract without full disclosure is void ab initio. They know and understand this. Therefore, there is no contract if, in fact, you are not given all of the specific terms of the contract. Well, since that didn't happen, where is the contract? Quite simply, there isn't one and never has been (void ab initio). Not even the accepting of a benefit can solidify this type of contract.

There is no reason that a Sovereign cannot contract or make an agreement with a "Person". Kings made contracts (agreements) with lesser people... did they not? If not, then how did they keep their throne? There was always "friends of the King" that watched his back... and in turn he did things for them, a lot of time, by private agreement. That doesn't mean that he became less than "King" to do so.

And, since a Sovereign is the only one that can waive his rights (or standing, status, class) then without declaring he has done so... it hasn't been done.

Even if the waitress is a person... it makes no difference to the Sovereign, nor can it alter his status by doing business with the restaraunt owner through the owners "agent", the waitress.

The definitions you cite tell the story of "what" those words mean... but do not tell the entire story. You also need the "how" those things operate.

Now a lot people will cite UCC... but I won't do that because it doesn't apply to me. I am Sovereign... not a fantasy. The UCC applies to illusions. (Check the word "fiction" and find that what I am really referring to here is the "deception" as a whole).

Why deal within the "fantasy"... the monopoly game? Stand outside of it. Move the pieces around the board. Watch them scurry along... one is the Hat, another the Car... and there goes the Thimble!!

Ice
Reply With Quote