|
Deliberation: reflection, thought, consideraton, care, forethought, weighing up.
Antonym:Impulsiveness
Especially: particularly, in particular, specially, above all, more than ever, mainly, chiefly, principally.
Think on that when you consider "Assent".
"Assent implies agreement especially as a result of deliberation."
This cannot mean an impulsive act or that which is not done without careful consideration. So, if you haven't considered a matter, reflected upon it, given it forethought, weighed it... is there "assent''??
How long does it take to carefully consider a matter?
Are there not always more questions with all of this gobble dee gook?
Here's another difference we have. You allow all of these definitions and codes to muddle everything up. You refuse to believe, for some reason, that a Sovereign always remains a Sovereign until he declares otherwise. This is in the nature of Sovereignty.
There is only one other way that a Sovereign can lose that standing - ONLY ONE. And you have not approached it at all. You believe that sovereignty is contracted away... lost by assent... but that is an impossibility for a Sovereign.
The only other way a Sovereign can lose his Sovereignty is by an ACT OF WAR upon him. He is then chained into slavery. He then is forced to live in a system foreign to him. He is then a mere "Person"... a "Thing."
It is my belief that you have allowed that "system" to form your theory of Sovereignty being something that MUST be waived in order to contract with people or things of lesser class, standing or status.
Let me ask you this: Is there anything that stops you from taking any action whatsoever?
Does the law actually stop you from doing contrary to the law? No?
Then why is that not Sovereignty?
If you contract with someone... what holds you to the contract? Do you not have the ability to do contrary to the terms of the agreement? You do?
Then why is that not Sovereignty?
Just because a Sovereign contracts with a "lesser", it does not mean he has given up his Sovereignty because he still has all the attributes of the Sovereign and can take action.
My hand still has the ability to type, regardless of any contract, and it will type until it is dealt a fatal blow... which is an act of war.
Think on that and consider the slave. Does he not still have the ability to act? Does he not still have the ability to fight, to run and to do those things needed to be free? He does?
And, if he does them... is that not the act of a Sovereign?
If he does them not, is that not the act of someone that has given up his Sovereignty?
As I demonstrated in the opening of this post, anyone can cite definitions and codes and other things.
But very few truly understand what it means to be Sovereign.
It is not something you ever have to give away or change in order to "contract" --- unless you are a slave and your Master declares that to be the case. And if you are a slave... then you are not Sovereign.
When I walk into a room... it does not change my status as Sovereign. But you imply that it can because walking into that room puts me into some foreign jurisdiction and that jurisdiction somehow negates my Sovereignty.
That's hogwash... and deep down, you know it.
Take away all your codes, rules, regulations, UCC's and Maxims --- what are you left with?
You are left with your very own capacity to think for yourself. Is that not Sovereignty?
When you are done reading all those codes and such, the only thing that will have changed is that your mind will be filled with them. The mind is a funny thing... be careful what you put into it.
Garbage in, Garbage out.
Remember this should we ever meet: I will always retain my Sovereignty. Even should I cross the threshhold of your door and join you in ale, it will still be mine.
Ice
|