Thanks RPT,



I like the way it sounds with 16th century flair and the biblical references. But I'm wondering if I answer "on behalf of Defendant", if it's really no different than if I said nothing at all and just answered.



If I (the individual - small letters) answer for the Defendant (Trust - all caps), I am answering "in behalf of..." the Trust (all caps) anyway.



I'm just wondering if I should answer it with a blatant MISIDENTIFICATION statement, ie...



"Aforementioned Defendant, FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME, appears to have a different identity than that of myself, Firstname Lastname, who was served this Summons as though I represent Defendant, when in fact I do not."



However, it would seem to me that if a Summons had the Defendant's name as JANE R DOE, and the papers were served on Bob Jones, then Bob would want to simply do something to notify the court that they served the wrong person. Why would Bob even want to try and answer all the other issues brought up in the Complaint???