[ndusa]

Not sure what happened here, posted something and it never came up.

I don't know about 'squatters rights', so to blacks I went. Here is what I found:

Adverse use- Use without license or permission; an element necessary to acquire title or easement by prescription. Shuggars v. Brake, 248 Md. 38, 234 A2d 752.

Now with that, I'm also looking at Adverse Possession. After reading that, it would appear as though this is for "claim" to the land. He doesn't want to do that, just want to give them a headache, and get something back for his time and money he invested. What do you think?