View Single Post
  #6  
Old 08-13-2006, 02:54 PM
ndusa's Avatar
ndusa ndusa is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: INSANITY
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgealexander
You changed Adverse Possession - which would be open, notorious, hostile and PAYING TAXES - to adverse use. I do not know anything about adverse use.

Man and woman co-habitating (?) effect a common law marriage. Had he simply been a 'roomer' living in a shack in the back yard, that would be another matter.

The woman obviously died with a will and left the house to the daughter. What does the daughter have to say about the past 7-8 years.

I would assume a lack of interest due to geography on the daughter's part and the actions of the attorney may be that of expediency.

Your comments about 'a bid' sounds like it is in tax foreclosure. The daughter may not know what is going on right now and the local attorney has been going to lunch with the county/city treasurer. Quid pro quo: I'll buy lunch; you bring those tax deeds in delinquincy.

Are they 'moving' New Town again??? B-)

George Alexander

The letter doesn't say it's for taxes. Thats where I'm confussed. The City shyster handed the guy this notice of eviction. The whole thing seems odd to me.

I still want to know about common law notice, and lien, and what will happen when you file one.

As far as the def. I posted, those are out of black's law dictionary. I may have misspelled some of it, as I wasn't looking what I was typing. But, I find no definition that you speak of for adverse use, which doesn't suprise me in the least.

Common law marriage? Where are you comming up with this? They would have had to agree to a marriage for it to be common law marriage. As usual, drag the thread out, staying as far from the original question as possible. Your next on the ingore list. With that, STAY THE HELL OUT OF MY THREADS, YOUR NOT NEEDED, WANTED NOR WERE YOU EVER ASKED!

The tax part makes no sense to me. NOBODY paid it. The daughter doesn't want it. Not sure if she's getting some money or not. I just felt a lien would be appropriate for this type of thing, but no body can seem to answer that here.

Blacks--Adverse Possession-"A method of acquisition of title to real property by possession for a statutory period under certain conditions. Lowery v. garfield County, 122 Mont. 571, 208 P.2d 478, 486. It has been described as the statutuory method of acquiring title to land by limitations. Field v. Sosby, Tex.Civ. App., 226 S.W.2d 484, 486. Blacks law Centennial Ed. (1891-1991)
__________________
yet another dead persona by

Scooterdog / NDUSA / Daywalker / IDOKNOW / theincubus / calfkilla / daisygirl / dochendrix / jdkross / sunlesswonder / skeptic62

Is it any wonder I was perm banned?
Reply With Quote