Sorry for the hindsight... wish I'd seen this thread before now...
You can't mix the processes.
Of course
statuatory case law says the common law is no good... 14th amendment slaves can't use common law process... it's not available to them... for the same reason the magistrate won't allow the Constitution to be mentioned.. Congress is in the way. (Common Law and Contract Law go between Man and the Constitution... the Constitution is a common law contract.. (a new gif is on the way))
Once they have successfully
presumed jurisdiction (labeled you a US citizen), you are the one, now under the burden of proof to prove you are a common law citizen and not a US citizen under their purview.
"A Presumption is but a rule of procedure used to supply wants of facts and its only effect is to cast burden on opposite party of going forward with proof."
Cichecki v. City of Hamtramck, Police Dept 382 Mich. 428, 170 N.W.2d 58.
Failure to immediately offer proof / evidence to the contrary, means you have lost your access to it (ie. "if you mention the Constitution in this courtroom one more time"...)
I'll post this in another thread (with a better gif) so others won't make the same mistake.
And for "the Net"s info.. Sui is pronounced "sue eye" not "sue eeee"
Click on the speaker
here.
For HIS Glory,
Akira