Yeah, I'm having fun!!!
Good job Al. Keep em comming. Lets get some from states other than California. Any Alaska court cites for the bill of attainder clause in the Alaska Constitution.
Keep in mind all of this is the ground work for lack of SMJ. If you can post in light of SMJ that will be helpful too. Maybe this could be that SMJ thread we wanted. Apparently if you start the thread with two or three pages it takes alot longer for the one-liners to trash it with litter and non-SJM arguments.
I wonder if people caught my statements earlier about there being essentially only one defensive plea in an administrative tribunal. That one plea is lack of SMJ. I think you have figured this out Al. The implementaion of the seperation of powers was the "no bill of attainder" clauses. These clauses allow for the objection to a court proceeding quasi(non)-judicialy.