I've read and re-read many of the threads on this site and have learned a tremendous amount. Thanks to the usual suspects: Ice, SJ, Jerseee, Kgod, HB, Seeker, Tora, Research1, Squirrels, Logos, Randy, and even The Man (for confirming for me the "weenie factor" among those out there who do not dare), et. al.



One thing I still don't get: If we say that we are not disputing the debt, and have even gone so far as to discharge it via CPN or BoE, then why would we insist on certified verification or seeing the original Note? I can see an attorney turning this around on us in court or depos.



Also, why ask for "certified verification" of the debt? I thought only originals would do?



If I am missing something glaringly obvious here, blame it on the lack of sleep.



B.



When the student is ready, the teacher appears.[i][b]