Thread: Traffic Ticket
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 09-14-2006, 03:17 PM
Big Al's Avatar
Big Al Big Al is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ALASKA
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillon Hunt
Traffic Ticket Actually reads:

This summons served personally on the defendant on __________ (date).

The issuing-charging law enforcement officer states under the penalties of perjury and falsification that he/she has read the above complaint and that it is true.


______(signed)_________
Issuing-charging law enforcement officer


Sure looks like he signed it under penalty of perjury.
Who out there thinks this is simulation of legal process? Who out there thinks that this is not a summons? Does anyone out there think that an officer of the executive branch can issue a summons?
Does any one out there think that a cop gave a proper oath in front of someone who had the authority to take his oath and make a written statement to the clerk of the court along side the road when that hot peice of paper was handed over?
Does anyone think this is what is ment by due process?
__________________
"It's what you think you know that ain't so, that causes all the problems"
Reply With Quote