Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PANICPASS
...I said it is an agreement to pay interest on the private credit you agreed to exchange for your labor. If you know those credits are not taxable then why do you sign the form?
|
I disagree with your usage of the term
interest and
pay. But if you must then we have to introduce the concepts of natural law formed through the Seven Noachide Laws. First I should answer your question
again:
Quote:
|
If you know those credits are not taxable then why do you sign the form?
|
Answer: At best your employer will label you a problem employee. The attorney, if your employer is large enough to keep one handy will charge a lot of money (salary) to call the IRS agent and get instructions to simply deduct withholdings. Several suitors have simply tried Refusing the presentment (W4 Form) for Cause unsigned. It would seem by simply accepting employment by a corporation one has consented to various diversions of funds.
So with that answered that leaves the man or woman a person for simply being a
daughter corporation.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PANICPASS
The Constitution does not authorize private credit.
|
Corporations (US - 1871) operate under charter. International and combinatorial treaty. I spent some time proving that out yesterday.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/attach...1&d=1158549326 and
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/attach...mg0024_dce.jpg As a member of a combine called the United Nations and without a treasury of its own (linked) there is effectively no United States economically.
Ergo one can accept that reality or the reality you seem to offer - that the only way to deal with a nation run amuck outside the authority of its own constitution is force or economic competition.* The provisions to move in the realm of international treaty are consitutional.
Public Law 102-14 must be viewed outside the scope of Christian fanaticism and force-shaping the Seven Noachide Laws into the Book of Revelation as a mystic book on Futurism. I have been utilizing the hyperbolic warnings of Rottweiller lately to bring that point to the forefront.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/end-da...-gibson-8.html And we cannot forget my utilization of Shoonra and Judge Roy Bean calling me
Van Pelt especially when they are upset with me. For me to reshape my name from David Merrill to David Merrill Van Pelt is to utilize the privilege in social compact of a legal or full name - to
feign self to be another. That is
nakar, or
nokriy from Noachide (Sons of Noah/heathens). - Deuteronomy 23:20 and read in a Judeo-Christian foundation of Western Law, says that the Israelites may charge usury -
interest - but only upon the Noachide.
Ergo my opening sentence in this post above.
I wish I could write three points together so the Reader would understand how they function in conjunction to create the illusion one has no right to the Constitution and its provisions for public money as a non-taxable event when cashing paychecks. Those subject to the jurisdiction of the United States (same verbiage as the 14th Amendment of 1868) were labeled the combatant enemy in 1933 in amendments to the
Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917 - replacing the German nationals in America. So maybe one would just follow my suggestion of reading this post three times through instead.
In summary the only legal thing about the Federal Reserve System in America is our right to constitutional public money in the alternative. And the Federal Reserve System will prosper as long as people are ignorant of that right.
Regards,
David Merrill.
* When one can accept the sovereign responsibility, one has also accepted the responsibility to view economics in the light of being a sovereign. This provides for the right to Refuse for Cause treaties in formation through publication in the Federal Register - like the Basel II Accord and
final rule.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/banks-...king-anpr.html