Quote:
[The officer begins relaying the "facts" and showing photographs as well as a video]
Defendant: Objection. . . . Assumes facts not yet entered into evidence.
Judge:Over ruled
[Officer finishes]
|
Ice,
Above is the one and only objection that was made. The judge was pretty abrasive with his responses so she may have been intimidated into not objecting more.
Jersee,
Do you suggest going the Void Judgment route vs. the Appeal route that Ice is suggesting? I tend to agree with the Void Judgement route in that the facts of the case are unchanged and I don't see any particular fact that could be brought forth apon review, however, if i understand correctly a Void Judgment is void on its face from the beginning for reasons such as lack of jurisdiction or ultra vires rulings - am i right? Any more thoughts?