10-15-2006, 11:05 PM
|
 |
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Freedom. some call Cal.
Posts: 2,332
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
Dividing, as does St. 1913, p. 639, drivers of automobiles into two classes, one professional chauffeurs, and requiring them to obtain a license, and pay an annual fee of $2, the other embracing all others, who are not required to secure a license or pay a license fee, is sound classification and not arbitrary, so as to constitute special legislation.
Ex parte Stork (Feb. 24, 1914), 167 Cal. 294
|
True. And it never realy changed. But the way it is set up now is that the code only recognizes "drivers" and "opperators" then only applies its self to state empoyee drivers and operators. Weird huh. My point is that NOW driver appears to be an innocent term. 
__________________
Educational and entertainment only. Nothing posted intended as legal advice. Nothing is legal advice. All responses are general in nature even if responding to a specific question. Nothing in my posts pertains to ANYONE else but me.
Hire an Attorney. 
|