Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Codee
More Georgia
There is pattern here to the codes... who sees it?
1) the codes may or may not apply to natural persons.
2) If the code does apply to natural persons I look to see if there is a smaller subset that the code is restricted to.
3) If the code is applicable to all persons including people like me, then I look to the violation. I look at how the violation is categorized.
4) Then I look for the authority to prosecute that class of violation. I usually do not find it.
95% of statutes I have found making it in someway illeagal to do that which harms no one, are not applicable to me.
This all just my opinion however and all should think for themselves.
|
By proper comprehension and remembering,
No act of any legislature applies to the private citizen.
IBM is a corporation, they can ONLY make Policy concerning their own property and their slaves/employees.
Now re-read the previous sentence after replacing `IBM' with `Municipal Corporation X'
it IS the same thing and conclusion.
In this IBM-context, what are taxes?
a shipping, handling and processing fee for the transfer of property.
It doesnt matter what the IRS does with the property it collects.
"But Wait" you say, "the IRS isnt a govt agency; the DoJ wont represent them in court and they arent listed on the Executive Branch's organisational chart and there are two trusts created on Guam and Puerto Rico..."
Right, so that means there is fraud by way misnomer, extortion, theft, breaking and entering, coercion,...
and all that means is that any inducement by someone to send a gift to them *IS* because of fear.
The decision to send to the IRS might be voidable by a court of competent jurisdiction.
and since the IRS is involved in global/international commerce, a court of admiralty jurisdiction would seem to be proper;
Does anyone recall the Court of International Trade (CIT) in New York City?
They used to be known as the Supreme Court before Congress changed their name.