View Single Post
  #4  
Old 11-14-2006, 05:56 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,274
agreed

Dear Rentiap;


I agree that Aaron Russo's America; Freedom to Fascism is just an emotional machine. It is completely ineffective. Here is an example:

Representative Ron Paul speaks extensively in an interview with Aaron.

However no mention survived the cutting room floor of Ron's 2002 bill to sunset the Bretton Woods Agreements.

http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/1-HR3812.jpg
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/2-HR3812.jpg
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/3-HR3812.jpg
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/4-HR3812.jpg

Your observations are correct - America FTF is nothing more than lip service like offered by Ron Paul. The hope of Congress abolishing the Fed is false.

We must do it ourselves as detailed in this DVD which was produced in counterpoint to Aaron's film.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ublicMoney.wmv

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ney_case_1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ney_case_2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_juliard.jpg

People are doing it. Even some members here have made up the rubber stamp.

The most prominent point I read was:

Quote:
3. The paper money the Fed creates has no backing - WRONG!!

The FRNs are backed by debt. That means the "Government bonds" mentioned on March 6, 1933 by FDR. Our endorsment is like swearing out an oath and that is confirmed by swearing out testimony under the penalty of purjury on the 1040 Form. I kind of wish I had thought to explain it that way to the Quatlosers when arguing that all citizens of the US are federal employees - - Nah!! [They are a lost cause.]




Enjoy destoying the Fed together,

David Merrill.


Quote:
To commit a perjury you have to FIRST be under oath (or
affirmation). You know that. It's common knowledge. So, to be
punished for a perjury you'd need to be under oath, right? Right.

There's no other way, unless you pretend to be under oath. To
pretend to be under oath is a perjury automatically. There would
be no oath. Hence it's a FALSE oath. Perjury rests on making a
false oath. So, to claim to be "under penalties of perjury" is to
claim that you're under oath. That claim could be true, could be
false. But if false, and you knowingly and willingly made that
false claim, then you committed a perjury just by making that
claim.
Attached Files
File Type: doc History of Oaths.doc (83.5 KB, 81 views)
File Type: doc Bond seminar.doc (131.5 KB, 88 views)
Reply With Quote