[weishaupt1776]

<font color=purple>[b] Jim, truly an honor for you to spend some time with the young guns. Thank You.



Here's a go:

"Your Honor, For the Record . . .



In this proceeding, is the court presuming that the name on the docket list is the same as the name of myself, the flesh & blood man standing before you in this proceeding?



Does the name of the "person" on the docket list for this proceeding at hand have the same sound as the name of myself who is the flesh & blood man standing before you in this court for this proceeding?



Is absolute accuracy in spelling the name on the docket list required for it to be associated with the name of myself who is the flesh & blood man in this proceeding before the court?



(Note: I was thinking we should enter our real upper case-lower case name as evidence in the record for this next question)



Although the name on the docket list is of a different spelling than mine as evidenced in "Exhibit___" in the record; does it convey to the ear the same sound which is practically identical with how the correct spelling of my uppercase/lower case name in "Exhibit__" would be pronounced?



If I , the flesh & blood man, were to respond when the incorrectly spelled name on the docket list was called, would the court consider that name to be sufficient identification of myself , the flesh & blood man in this proceeding?

Note: I am not a genius-John Jennings & his partner Marlon showed me the word "idem sonans" in Black's 4th. I just reproduced the definition in the form of multiple questions. However, I am an artist & good artists only copy while the GREATEST artists steal.