View Single Post
  #97  
Old 11-16-2006, 07:58 AM
Codee's Avatar
Codee Codee is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Freedom. some call Cal.
Posts: 2,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
I am not quite sure what to make of Codee's contributions. Sometimes he seems to be taking my side.

I have used court decisions from a variety of states -- I am not in, and did not confine my research to, California -- but NO STATE has ever recognized a "right" to drive a car on the public roads without a DL. The US Supreme Court has, however, held that states have the authority and the duty to require DLs as a safety measure.

Where on earth is the federal law requiring states to license persons who drive?

On the other note it sometimes appears as if I am agreeing with you because I am not using the same convention of arguing that you are used to. It must be easy to sit there and smack down opinions that were poorly written. But I am arguing law here and not opinion.

Shoonra I a will point out that the actual analysis on the other threads of actual statutes is virtually non-existent. I assume it is because you do not know of arguments against the root of SMJ.

You have been arguing against personam jurisdiction for so long you forgot about the force of a good SMJ.

Cody.

P.S. I am not going to argue any cases. you go ahead. I feel they are weak.
__________________
Educational and entertainment only. Nothing posted intended as legal advice. Nothing is legal advice. All responses are general in nature even if responding to a specific question. Nothing in my posts pertains to ANYONE else but me.
Hire an Attorney.
Reply With Quote