Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ice
There is, cited somewhere within this forum, a S.C. case that states the right to travel exists with ANY FORM of CURRENT TRANSPORTATION. (which totally rebuts your above statement).
But, as Codee points out, it is useless to argue with "evidence" such as this because THERE ARE TOO MANY CONTRADICTORY DECISIONS handed down.
Best stick to SMJ.
|
If you find it, that South Carolina decision was not on point, was issued almost a century ago, and since then South Carolina law and court decisions on DL resembles every other state.
There are not "too many contradictory decisions". The decisions from every state, at least since 1930, ALL uphold the authority and responsibility of the state to limit driving privileges to people who qualified for, and have, current DLs.
Subject matter jurisdiction is even less helpful. The subject matter is the public road within the court's geographic reach, not the residence of the driver or any other details.