11-16-2006, 01:53 PM
|
 |
Banned User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
If you find it, that South Carolina decision was not on point, was issued almost a century ago, and since then South Carolina law and court decisions on DL resembles every other state.
There are not "too many contradictory decisions". The decisions from every state, at least since 1930, ALL uphold the authority and responsibility of the state to limit driving privileges to people who qualified for, and have, current DLs.
Subject matter jurisdiction is even less helpful. The subject matter is the public road within the court's geographic reach, not the residence of the driver or any other details.
|
"S.C." does not stand for "south carolina".
Try "Supreme Court" as on SCOTUS.
And it was very much on point. Any modern conveyance... whether it be horse and carriage or automobile.
And the Supreme Court decision voids your statement.
I note also that you say "limit driving privileges". Well, if my auto is my property and I have a right to travel... guess what?
Ice
|