Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
Assuming that Codee is accurately reporting these dismissals, I am baffled ... unless they are being dismissed for a reason other than the much discredited "right to travel" argument. For example, Codee has referenced some detail of the California court system that puts traffic tickets into a special traffic court which evidently doesn't exist in his neck of the woods. I do not have any particular knowledge of the California court system on this matter, but if this is what happened then it would be a valid dismissal - from the court in which he appeared - but if the appropriate traffic court became available the claim might be re-processed there.
I am not trying to humor anybody. I am trying to inform people.
|
Correct. It has nothing to do with an explicit right to travel. The whole thing is implicit. I implicitly have the right to do anything that is not legislated against. There is no legilation requiring me to follow traffic REGULATIONS. Therefore a formal complaint can never be made alledging all of the essential facts. The dismissal for California traffic tickets is %100 of time won due to failure to file a formal complaint. Now there are other and more lengthy arguments that I have used with success too.
But the lack of formal complaint tied right into the STATUTE requiring such is bingo give away.