Read the Above "Title" Before lambasting and spinning this reply......
**THIS IS A COPY/PASTE***
Once Again....This is a COPY/PASTE !!!
***BEGIN****
I am familiar with that movie. I find that researcher generally irrelevant.
If you read enough of my writings, you will see several references to "From Freedom to Fascism" as a production that largely distracts folks from simple and effective precautions (inclduing sheltering) and encourages angry self-pity and "contacting your congressman to complain." That is an exercise in futility, in my judgment, and there are other much more practical options (like sheltered bank accounts, sheltering earnings and assets, etc).
In my recent "election time" humor piece, the reference to "contact the Federal Reserve and demand that they abolish the US Congress" is a parody of Aaron Russo. I believe his movie perpetuates a fundamental misunderstanding and is thus generally misleading. More on that in a moment.
I consider it a solid forecast that the Federal Reserve will be part of the process to abolish the US Congress when that time comes. You may be shocked and dismayed about what I know (and recently posted to redpill_info) about the central banking globalization program (including the European Union), but never do I conclude with "and you should continue to abdicate your personal responsibility for your choices and the consequences of those choices and just wave your fists at the bankers and the politicians and so on."
Most of the people who watch Freedom to Fascism will make themselves into more obvious targets and that is probably why even extremely minor privacy precautions may be sufficient to stay clear. With tons of folks drawing attention to themselves, simple discretion is even safer. Let them "catch the bullets" as the saying goes.
Lots of my clients believe what the government agents told them in government schools: that fascism is foreign to the USA. That is a conclusion that many do not question. That is the premise of the movie's title: From Freedom to Fascism. There are other alternate conclusions that may have equal or more evidentiary support, if one wishes to explore.
The relevant point is that if you or I trust that someone is relevant because they are clearly sincere, you or I will get the consequences of that. Teachers in government schools are often sincere. Students from those schools are often sincere. Government-licensed doctors and lawyers and on and on my all be sincere, but sincerity does not equate to wisdom or prudence etc. I was sincere about Santa- when I was 4.
On the other hand, if you/I trust yourself/myself because you/I have identified something which is clearly relevant, you/I may experience very different consequences. Is Russo sincerely angry? Probably, but who really cares? However, there is no such thing as sincerely relevant, only relevant or not.
Taking care, we fare well!
JR
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/redpill_info
http://www.redpill.info
**END***COPY PASTE*** Once again---
**END***
Begin** with "my" thoughts..I like the flick, even "own" it, yet, what is presented above has substance!!**End*
with "my" thoughts...Happy Turkey.......