[Ice]

Actually,&I knew from the start that it was nothing more than a question of "which U.S." they were talking about.& But, if they ever bring any of these cites into a court room scenario, you want to be able to rebut them as best you can.


As I said before, I do not believe that we actually need to do anything until/unless we are attacked by them.& It then becomes their obligation to PROVE their assumption in regards to our citizenship.


One thing I know to be true about most people is that if you show them something that may prove their idea/belief/position to be in error they will defend their idea/belief/position and/or accuse you of not having done your research or&having no knowledge of the issue.& It seems to be natural for people to be defensive... even if it may put them into "argument".& We sure are a complex creation... ain't we?


But I brought these to his attention and asked specific questions in an attempt to acquire something more from him.& I guess he said all he can say in his book and on his site (there is a lot of stuff there).


He did say that he would check out the proclamations.& But, it's probably the same old thing... "definition of terms".& (Which U.S.?)


&