|
Re:CHILD SUPPORT remedy
Ice,
It is possible that this was in fact the the ladies' last resort... and while it is a step I do not support, I do not think she is a fool for trying to secure some support from a responsible party who refuses responsibility... it may be the only way she thinks it can happen. But court is definately not the right way to solve family problems, it will probably only distance her and the child even more from its father.
FNM,
I agree that men who father a child need to be responsible for it, but I do not believe that BB has any business in enforcing this. If we give them that power, than we may as well tell them to dictate who can and can't have children in the first place. (sound familiar?)
I know this is a touchy situation for you, and I do not blame you one bit for venting. When people run out on their family responsibilities, it makes me sick too... however, the young lady bringing the court action against 4Integrity may not wany him in her life at all, she may just want his $$.
4Integrity,
I think all of us would like more details re the court action & imprisonment.
I guess I am an apologist today...
Sui Juris
__________________
When a statute, code, or court holding changes tomorrow, does reality change? Does truth change? Does right and wrong change?
If so, there are no absolutes, and the only logical conclusion is that reality, truth, and right and wrong are determined arbitrarily on a daily basis by those with the most power, guns, and money, and the rest of us can choose to run, fight, or be their slaves.
|