Quote:
|
Originally Posted by teneagles
Forgive me for not being explicit.
The Plaintiffs have filed a complaint in State District Court. The main jist of the complaint is that I since I filed the Affidavit and Truth as a judgement against my land since it was unrebutted, and since it has no merit in their opinion, I have clouded my title to the land and damaged the land association who is the plaintiff. They go so far as to say I am guilty of conspiracy for talking to my neighbors about what I did.
|
This isn't legal advice, but IMHO, the conspiracy allegation is pretty lame and probably designed to deter you or at least reinforce their portrayal of your maneuvers as being frivolous. Some states and courts look very unfavorably on attempts to screw around with land ownership laws, liens, etc.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by teneagles
... that the Affidavit of Truth had already put them into estopple, on constitutional grounds of freedom to associate and speech, laches and unclean hands based on timing and specific issues in the Affidavit... They also counter the estoppel by acquiescense of the Affidavit of Truth filed before their complaint, with the argument that no case law or ruling gives the creator of an Affidavit of Truth right to set an arbitrary response date that forces the acquiescense.
|
They are correct about that.
Affidavits of truth have gained some interest because they seem so simple and allegedly let people put the other party on notice with a deadline and tacit acceptance, but they have no force of law when applied as you've attempted and have resulted in sanctions and even contempt citations.
You might want to research some local cases involving such things before you push it far enough to have penalties imposed.