The notice is one thing, if a seizure is challenged properly a court order needs to be produced or it is reversed with a order signed by a judge. Go to Tax Court, USDC, etc. and the seizure will stand up. It needs to be done in the same jurisdiction that the IRS uses. That would be the A/M at the district court of the United States and I believe the fee is $59. A libel of review is critical to see if a court order was obtained before the seizure took place. It is easier for the IRS to get others to grab stuff and just turn it over to them by using extortion instead of getting a court order first so that is what they do, knowing very few will figure out their elaborate scam. If the IRS did try to obtain a court order first they would have to sue in the name of the party at interest, that would be the IMF. Now that would not look too good to Americans to see that now would it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Codee
There need not be a paper called lien. A lien is an encumberment and the paper is but meer evidense. A notice is good evidence because it is also evidense that you have had a chance to respond since its notice date.
|