New "Saving to Suitors" Case

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth

I love how they included "Bill" after the denominations. So when does the bill get paid I wonder?

Thank you for that contribution by the way. That is quite an epiphany when you consider lawful money v. private credit.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[mrg]

..................................

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Thank you for that contribution by the way. That is quite an epiphany when you consider lawful money v. private credit.



Regards,

David Merrill.

Settling the bill releases the suitor from the national debt and SDR's (Special Drawing Rights) which releases gold at $42.22/ounce!

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releas...0308assets.htm

Look at the footnotes about earmarking gold in the UN's IMF Trust Fund and apply standard billing practices. Consider that the gold removed for SDR's was planned that gold could come back into the system in the future. (see attachments)

Settling the bill against the suitor, in his true name actually removes $350 SDRs from the fund in gold at $42.22/ounce! Collection would crash the FRN-"dollar"'s elasticity in a heartbeat.

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/banks-...-exchange.html



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Dillon Hunt]

Originally Posted by mrg

As long as this goes on, NONE are innocent that are aware of it.

And those who choose to ignore it are worse.

You are "surprised" by the images?

We are all in violation of some moral law. Don't be to quick to judge bush. If You or I break one moral law we are just as guilty as if we broke them all.

I don't agree with the war, but You and I or anyone else are all capable (given the wrong circumstances) of doing the same violent acts as in your images, except for the grace of God. Mankind is sick and messed up. We all (mankind) deserve the same fate as those people in your images.

That is why the Savior (The Lord Jesus) came and died on a Bloody Cross and Rose from the Dead.

It's like Jesus said, unless you repent, you shall likewise perish ! (repent mean turn to God)

I am sure the Self-Righteousness are right down there with the murders, Ya think

Humbly, Dillon

Believe me, nobody is going to get away with anything, we all will give an account to the Lord.

[David Merrill]

Indeed, as I said; Settling the Bill.

[Soldier of Truth]

Originally Posted by mrg

We are all quite responsible for the facts leading to those revolting images, admit or not, like it or not.

If you choose to ignore it, so be it.

But, there it is, nonetheless.

It is convenient to ignore it isn't it?

Otherwise behold the fruits of what WE ALL have sown.

That is where the gas you put in your car comes from, the food you put on your table comes from, the clothes you put on your back come from, the "money" your suitors "pay" you with comes from.

That is the "backing" the "economy" "runs" on.

mrg. That's a bold statement, considering that most don't control any of the mechanisms that put those machines in motion. I know I myself can adamantly state the contrary. So, an accurate statement would be those making it happen are are responsible. And as you are able to make posts, I would assume that you have done a self-annihilation move to right your wrong. (Your words not mine.) I have done my stand (and continue to do so). But you would never know because proof is buried under a "Do Not Publish" banner, and unless you "know" my case number, you couldn't go read the briefs exposing a fraction of the whole upon which you lay blame at the feet of everyone. Unfairly, and inaccurately I would also say.

[Soldier of Truth]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

The bills are signed paid by the suitor. That is why he signed in his true name while requesting dba.

Anything he buys - like an evidence repository for future Refusals for Cause in the US courthouse - even the "exclusive original cognizance" of the US government according to the 'saving to suitors' clause is owned in allodium.

This is why the clerk must continue to file Refusals for Cause even after many years. An interesting report came in about diversity. A suitor wanted the clerk to send back a marked copy of a R4C (on a restraining order against her) so she included a self-addressed prepaid envelope. The clerk made out a new envelope adding her family name as a legal or full name and (sarcastically) even included her envelope in the mailing!

http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._falsified.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._corrected.jpg

The clerks have been trying to falsify documentation and nomenclature, to avoid this diversity of citizenship that Jerry Carlos points out - fellowcitizens in the kingdom of heaven (on earth) and embassadors for Jesus Christ. But one may summon the clerk before their administrator (attached) and notice the dates on the linked Certificates - get a correction of facts.

David Merill:

Where exactly did you begin addressing "suitors" on this forum so that I may get myself grounded. It is my understanding that HJR 192 is ineffective as of 1977 as codified at 31 USC 5118(2)(d). I concede that even though no more, there is pattern and practice of the old policy.

Set me straight.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth

mrg. That's a bold statement, considering that most don't control any of the mechanisms that put those machines in motion. I know I myself can adamantly state the contrary. So, an accurate statement would be those making it happen are are responsible. And as you are able to make posts, I would assume that you have done a self-annihilation move to right your wrong. (Your words not mine.) I have done my stand (and continue to do so). But you would never know because proof is buried under a "Do Not Publish" banner, and unless you "know" my case number, you couldn't go read the briefs exposing a fraction of the whole upon which you lay blame at the feet of everyone. Unfairly, and inaccurately I would also say.

I believe the responsibility that Mrg is speaking of, relative to all of us being partially to blame, lies in the fact that we have not executed the duties of our office in a proper fashion. Had those duties been conducted by us in the proper manner, then there is greater possibility that these things might not have happened. The office I speak of is the 'office of citizen'. Those, herein, that are still registered voters, are members holding that office, and that office is a 24/7/365 job. The responsibilities of that office do not end at the closing of the doors of the local precinct wherein the votes were cast. The duties must be carried out in a manner that makes each voter watchful of those that were put in office (public trust), and when a violation is witnessed, it is the duty of the holder of the office of citizen to make known, to the other holders of the same office, the fact(s) of the violation(s) and action must then be taken to punish the wrongdoer and or correct the violation.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

[mrg]

..........................

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Soldier of Truth

David Merill:

Where exactly did you begin addressing "suitors" on this forum so that I may get myself grounded. It is my understanding that HJR 192 is ineffective as of 1977 as codified at 31 USC 5118(2)(d). I concede that even though no more, there is pattern and practice of the old policy.

Set me straight.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...8----000-.html

The section is short enough not to quibble about finding (2)(d) - maybe (d)(2)?

(2) An obligation issued containing a gold clause or governed by a gold clause is discharged on payment (dollar for dollar) in United States coin or currency that is legal tender at the time of payment. This paragraph does not apply to an obligation issued after October 27, 1977.

In light of the Bretton Woods Amendments (P.L. 94-564) it should be clear that instead of US dollars, by which the value of gold earmarked in the UN's IMF Trust Fund for SDR's is still $42.22/ounce, now Americans are free, since §5118 to buy and sell gold at the new "floating" exchange rate of the dollar.

In other words gold purchases are widely made within the scope of elastic currency, private credit from the Fed instead of lawful money. Note that they are calling the currency legal tender. HJR-192 prohibited gold clauses and this USC section now allows them but specifies that gold will be traded on elastic currency instead of inelastic currency - US notes.

Shoonra has explained this well about four months back.

I will attach a few pages from the Amendments and you might see what is happening from that.



Regards,

David Merrill.