Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court > Appellate Decisions
Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., No. 04-17126 [9th Cir. December 12, 2005] Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., No. 04-17126 [9th Cir. December 12, 2005]
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:25 AM
J.W.'s Avatar
J.W. J.W. is offline
Admin
  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 294
Exclamation Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., No. 04-17126 [9th Cir. December 12, 2005]
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) does not require that a consumer's dispute of the validity of a debt be in writing.

_______________________________

Ladies and Gentleman, this is a MUST READ!!! Spank you; spank you very much is the theme song the appellate court trumpets as the smash down upon this debt collector swine.

Click here to download the appellate decision: Camacho-v-BridgeportFinancial.pdf

Jason
__________________
NOTICE & CAVEAT: This post is provided "AS IS" and without warranties of any kind either expressed or implied and is not to be construed as legal advice in any capacity whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US v. Jacobs, No. 04-2214 [3d Cir. December 14, 2005] J.W. Appellate Decisions 0 12-14-2005 11:05 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer