The Naked Truth About Quatloos Spirit

[Sharing Lights]

sharinglights
Pirate o' Non-Pithy Prolix Parlance


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 175

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nikki wrote:
If the laws of karma are so overpowering, what did you do in your previous life to bring your current misery upon you?

I think your g-string is too tight and may be pulling you in the wrong direction.


If your read my Esoterica Thread, you would have not asked that.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/genera...esoterica.html


By the laws of Esoterica, I view any negative experience as a necessary step to overcome what I may be lacking.

I am being absolutely sincere with you and all.

Better yet, I would answer in my way, a your brightness called it no "subjects and objects."

Please do provide:

1. a better response in the light of mine - not by BS and please, please, already,
2. do post my contract you discussed in such details.


Misery applies to those who defame and use cheap lies.
Not to those who fight for Truth & Justice.

Quote:
Reincarnation And Or Trials

The question enters searching mind,
“why do I pay sometimes and know I
for what I have not done on Earth.”
The life is not so always kind.
Where is the justice, cause, effect?
Do I deserve that since my birth?
How can make sense and have respect?


I must admit that question, dearly,
is staying on my searching mind.
I must make sense of life around me.
I only write what know sincerely.
I see “injustice” in some cases.
I can’t, then, blindly, just, agree.
I need the proof or real traces.

Of all the answers that I found
by reading and by meditating,
I came to two; can’t get to one.
By truth I only would be bound.
The answers are - 1) reincarnation
or 2) life is test from which can’t run.
For now, less answers than frustration.

Ok, a test of life makes sense:
you are given that which makes you stronger
by virtue of what you are lacking,
as muscles grow by being tense.
So you can overcome your weakness
and trials would continue knocking
until you leave behind that darkness.

But, then I have a question simple.
How cruel is, sometimes, the life
to maim and kill and, even, babies
when lives are lost and not just dimple?
Where is the justice then, I ask you?
Too many questions, then, and “maybes;”
too many shades, then, in the view.

Reincarnation gives solution,
and I admit it makes much sense.
I shall find answer – I keep searching
and going through my evolution.
All pay for what have done before.
And if that's truth - it's scorching.
At least, I know to look what for.

If every life is based on chain
of all the past lives of before,
then, one is suffering the consequences,
and everything is not in vain
and by the present, we “correct” the past.
To anything, there must be answers.
To find them, I will search my best.


Sharing Lights©
Sui Juris
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice.



Misery?

Each time, you clowns jump, I only respond better and better, that's why you just cant; give up as have to prove something to yourself, while making fools of yourself before many.

People laugh at you -not me.
Contract please.
_________________
Sacred Triangle: Believe/Learn/Accomplish.
Foundation: Cement the above by Virtues.
Finding the true Center is the Key!
In order to preserve fairness & accuracy,
my writing(s) may be re-posted unedited
& in context only.

Back to top

grammarian44 wrote:
sharinglights, I really can't follow what you're saying anymore. It's not that I agree or disagree with you. It's that I can't understand you. Moreover, I really don't see why it's necessary to refer to bodily functions or underwear almost every time you post. That's a real disincentive to trying to understand you. All I can tell is that you feel a sense of outrage, as if people on this site have harmed you personally and irreparably. For the life of me, I can't tell where the feeling comes from, and yes, I've read all the previous posts.

Keep it simple.
Stop BS-ing.

You know well what wrote yourself....
Before you ask questions, ask yourself, "why would you be mesmerized to read me after all you have said and done?"
Didn't your clowning friends inform you that I use incomprehensible Yoda-yada?

Whatever I reply, you may not comprehend me, then.
So, you can chill, then, too.
_________________
Sacred Triangle: Believe/Learn/Accomplish.
Foundation: Cement the above by Virtues.
Finding the true Center is the Key!
In order to preserve fairness & accuracy,
my writing(s) may be re-posted unedited
& in context only.

Back to top

SL wrote:
Quote:
Most importantly, those who have found meaning in Life, do not have to resort to lies, defamation, slander, all the BS you and you kin does.

When have I or my kin lied, defamed, or or slandered anyone?


iplawyer
Queen of the Blue Box Cargo Cult


Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 221

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are angry beyond belief. I would really hate to be you. It is so nice to have a non-controversial life without the kinds of problems you have.
_________________
If at first you don't succeed failure may be your thing.

Back to top


SL: Inserted - You, defamation lovers have as much in common with truth and logic as a car with pink underwear.


On the other thought....
in your proud quest for stupidity and malice you "overcome



all odds" .....

As much as you lie and avoid substance, you may manage to, even, fit underwear on a car.

I am not joking (:
as captain-minion proclaimed out of his lungs - I have no sense of humor.

Of course, I don't.

He has everything after he got the best house and everything the best in life.

So, what's left for me, mere mortal?


What a sucksess he may be.
Wow!

[Sharing Lights]

CaptainKickback
LAmbasciatore de Latveria


Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 1656
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like so many "self-righteous" people who are sure that only they are of import, ShareCareBearLights has no sense of humor. His entire life is sturm und drang and all about his epic struggle against a world that is "out to get him."

I am reminded of two quotes that apply to him. The first is from Mame (Lucille Ball version), "Life's a banquet and most sons-a-bitches are starving to death." Enjoy the banquet (if you can) ShareCareBearLights.

The other one, also applicable to SCBL, is very NYC in nature, "F*ck you." I bet you've heard that one before, haven't you?
P.S. - it's yadda yadda yadda. Yoda, yoda is repeating the name of a Star Wars movie character. And you say your from New York.........
_________________
The 82% Rule: 82% of the people in the world are total idiots, 13% have a vague idea of what is going on and 5% are truly aware.

Back to top



SL: captain-minion,
you are wrong in your ways of defending your wrong.

Your stubbornness is like a tree that is not wiser than a tree yet manages to send a derogatory message to the world.

You have that talent.


Just read yourself and your signs:

Your frustration may come from inability to perform in life, as even ****** may fail those who perform as a tree...
and manage to release
not the tension but only spite and malice.

Such does make one impotent to logic and common sense.




Now, all may see your infatuation with the "F" word.

It may be in your roots and branches...


Don't forget to weight what you have gained and lost by
spreading your "F" all.

[Sharing Lights]

ommon Sense

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Open Dictatorship cemented by defiance of common sense

=============================================
Quote:
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica


Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Posts: 9900 Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:08 pm Post subject:


________________________________________
Cut and pasting stolen text about copyright laws. How ironic.

Thread is too long. Good night, thread.

Back to top
=============================================

1. Whereas, a person like that decides what’s too long or to short;

2. When there is no respect to any member who posts and is precluded from such in the original space;

3. When IP (Intellectual Property) is stolen by virtue of keeping locked what does not belong to her and to which she has not contributed;

4. When defying common senses administrator based on her personal hatred of me, and whining of infantile Nikky, releases her absurdness in the cyberspace that I steal Public Domain ( I steal or you do, maybe by locking?) (how more stupid can an argument get? (ironic or not)

5. I can conclude that I have not seen so much dictatorship, arrogance and utter stupidly in one place.

6. Fish does rot from a its head

7. You are something – you really are.

8. I was just observing and wondering how farther and closer to absurdity it can get.

9. This fascism – open and cheap – too long – too short, what else: too black - too white?

10. Not Common sense and enlightenment but exactly like comments above reign here.


What are you proud of?
Ignorance & failure, usurpers and piles?

[Sharing Lights]

"Imalawman"]First, its not Demo's website. Though she is a moderator and acts according to the rules set out in the agreement.

Second, You agreed to the terms of the agreement before you submitted your first post - its hardly a unilateral contract. Quit whining.

If I were a moderator, which I'm glad I'm not, you would have been history a long time ago. You see, I have no tolerance for the mindless ramblings of a madman.

Quote:

Who cares what you care?
Wake up already.
I have not seen one post her of substance from you -only cheap lies.

Please prove me wrong, please. (:


Let's expose your stupidity with a smile.

Post my writings that average consumer would qualify as of madman.

Then read your pearls, just don't forget.
Prove it, wizard.


You don't seem to understand that: no one cares about your theories, everyone thinks you're crazy, everyone is getting pissed off at your cut and pasting, no one can understand your yoda-like rambings and you post way too much!!!



Quote:


(:

If I say you are utterly stupid, you may accuse me of being rude but how to call you behavio? Smart?


You may never claim your wounded and soundly defeated opinion and of your friends as EVERYONE.

No, lier, far far from Everyone.

I don't claim that all think you are dumb.
I do, many more do but some love you - like your kin.



All normal and decent people are glad that I am capable of helping your dumbness and that of other pile throwes to defeat you as it is and not behind your back.


You can not oppose me by merit - that is why you cry I write to much.

When lie, at least try to look smart.

As for locking up threads, I repeat again: it is wrong to prevent the author of IP of access to his writing.

That is it.

This Website violates the rights of authors.

On top of it I have a disclaimer stating what it states.


Quote:

So you accuse me again of copy/paste just like other [crude scatalogical reference] throwers.


Fine, her is another one from my writings that you publicly lie is not mine.


Produce on the same level or better, I would applaud your talent.

Reveal it please.


Many of readers are awaiting and eagerly to see your proof.
Shower us.


The Sword Of Dark Deliverance.

I am the Dark Deliverance. Here is my sword.
You called me by actions and by your Word.
You chose injustice, lies, and hate.
Then, mortal freeze. I am at your gate!
Too late for excuses – I say, you, shut up!
Fall to the bottom – swim in your [crude scatalogical reference].
The Earth and sky endured you for longgggg.
I have found you. So die! Sing your last song.
You thought you are invincible forever.
Blindness by pride is, simply, not clever.
You neither hear me, nor see the shade;
busy spreading injustice and hate,
pleading legions to hell's coalition,
only pursuing your ways in ambition.
Some words you chose at times when you speak
and the way you bull [crude scatalogical reference] who 're, so, weak…
is going too far, so must I arrive.
Too late to give speeches or to lie.
You fool yourself – do you think me?
From that you can't run, hoping to flee.
You are a master of twisting by lies.
Enough of that! Get up, mortal, rise!
You are not in charge, just, anymore.
That's in the past of the ways of before.
Look at me, mortal and answer me now.
How low would you sink and fearfully bow
before me: the Deliverance’s force?
Who can save you: your money or whores?
Choose silence or say what you want.
if believing in lies – know - that I don't!
I judge more than words but mainly the deeds.
Rip the harvest of planted, so, seeds!
Now, you feel the approaching shade.
That is my Sword invoked by your hate.
How quickly you loose your hopes and a smile.
You should; you have, only, a while
before the verdict and not of your win.
You laughed at mercy; you chose to sin.
That has been such, silly choice.
Your clock is still ticking unlike your poise.
Argue, defend, you may, even, accuse,
but you, really, have blown my patience and fuse!
It’s not that short, but I’ve seen enough.
Welcome to me - my "innocent dove."
By the orders of Justice, I execute.
The powers so given are above any feud.
No demons, no angels can argue with me.
I am the Deliverance - uncorrupted and free.
I do not take bribes or compromise
or you believe you can feed me your lies?
The tables, for you, are, finally, turning.
Truth by the Sword is brightly, now, burning.
By law of the Cosmos – hate faces its end.
Your card is reading, "Deliverance’s land."
Now, you feel the edge of the “Sword.”
So, it is time to pray to the Lord.
So it is time to beg for the grace.
Do you feel, now, the blade at your face?
Don't blame God, people, your fate,
or that a chance is given too late.
You guided your fate by, only, Your hand.
Undo your life? You know: you, just, can't.
You, yourself, made all of your choices.
You listened to hell with its, many voices,
while rejecting the truth and the sun.
So experience what you have done.
I am The Sword of Deliverance – more than of death.
Finally, now, you are out of your breath.
You never believed in truth or in me.
How naive. Would you agree?
You thought I was a silly tale.
Look at you now – so scared and pale.
My Sword is shining before your eyes.
It cuts through obstacles, ambitions, and lies.
You are ignorant flesh. What can you do?
"Nothing now -" and you know - it is true.
You punished others. So, meet your “reward.”
Argue if can - you are in My Court! .


SharingLights©
All Rights Reserved
Without Prejudice

............................

[Sharing Lights]

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CaptainKickback wrote:
ShinningLights has exhausted any sympathy I had for him.

You did?

As a typical attorn-eye-yee, you lie even in your sleep.
(SL: Insert - he stated later that he is not an attorney.

I apologize for assuming he was.
Assumptions are wrong.
But he does act like one - that is why I thought he was one of them.)



1. You were probably not let into that one law library because (if your actions here are any indication) you may have been acting like a crazed street bum.

SL: (:
Quote:

Not only you act as dumb getting dumber but you lie as that's all you know.

That is your reality.


I would expose it since you ask.

I was entering the library silently.
I was asked to produce an id of attorney or judge.

You know what was the issue.
I posted.
You read.

Let's face it - captain of looseria, you act sneakily - that's all.

You try to say something nasty because you act nastily.
That is the truth.

It is funny to you that people ar not allowed in court libraries.
Keep laughing then.
Why not?

Many may say - you act as a low life, then.
Why?

Even, while, you have never seen me, still compared me with a street bum, particularly after read my writings.

Aren't you sneaky and low?
Very low indeed.

I have another proof of your ways:


You can't stand me since I reveal who you are by your spirit.
You can't stand my writings because they are of me.


Yet you are glued to the screen, waiting for me to post.

Why do you read me at all?

You are truly full of it, you and your friends.

And even public libraries have the right to prevent what they perceive to be crazed street bums from coming in, disrupting the place and befouling the furniture and atmosphere of the library. You'd be surprised how much further you can get, if you don't come off like a drug-addled, screeching loon.

SL: A typical attorney's cheap [crude scatalogical reference] throws as you are full of them. You are an attorney aren't you? (:

2. Sure hope you have another place to live lined up, because (if your actions here are any indication) you are probably going to have your a** handed to you in court. It will be so swift you won't realize it has occurred until 5 minutes after the fact. The magic 8-ball says, "Outlook is not good." If you act in court like you do here, your case will get tossed, you will get tossed and if you are real lucky, you will get a free contempt charge too.

SL: Typical attorney, wishing People to lose so that can make more monies on them. You want the system to be screwed up, so that people like slaves depend on you & you and your buddies can screw the People.

You, attorneys, take monies from people even when lose.

I say when lose don't charge, why pay for non-performance?


Why attorney care at all when gets paid either way.




You, guys dream of being slave masters.

3. This is all OPINION, based on your limited interactions here and is not guaranteed and is subject to change. Your mileage may vary. Offer void in Alabama.

SL: Go flash your opinion and your mouth if that may help.
Am I direct enough?

Have a day.

Thank you, dear, thank you kindly.

When these skull and bones lovers release so much hate in their air, they do not even realize that what cames out under such, heavy pressure only makes cracks in their essence.

And that essence is quite dark with slight flashes of something.



When accuse others, captain-minion, don't forget to look at yourself from all the directions.

[Sharing Lights]

A Disclaimer:

As I have stated, I can reply when time is permitting to do so.
Much time has been, already, wasted, here, by numerous members living on vanity comments and insults instead of intelligent debates.

Time is of the essence to some and not so to others.
My priorities are set.


Quote:
A future post would be:
a collateral strike vs. Roy Bean (his honor)
revealing his true essence by precise facts and evidence.

I always keep my promises.

His is "honorable" – he deserves such, personal attention.

Cheap lies and fraud would be exposed quickly and easily.
So would be - expensive lies and fraud. (:

If anything is blocked here, such would be posted on http://suijuris.net and other Forums under my name and always.
Stay tuned (if like.)

Roy, Roy, Roy... and I did write that you have your value when was warned about you.

I defended your freedom for opinions even when you acted dishonorably on Sui Juris.

No wonder you wrote so much [crude scatalogical reference] vs. David.

SL: Insert: the cat in helmet keeps deleting the word "crap" as if I wound her sensitive senses...)

Under the 1st Amendment, I allege:

You love writing [crude scatalogical reference].
You love [crude scatalogical reference] - period.

You remind me of fly's affinity for its passioin...


I still state all have rights for their opinions but the way you lie, oh, man....actually - retract man - judge, judge indeed.


No wonder you joined Nikky - what a tango duo...
Keep on dancing, why not, judge?




In reply to the subject(s) raised.

(1) Issue:
(2) Legal Theory:
(a) Case 1.
(b) Case 2.
(3) Nexus to My Case in Brief:
(4) Logical Assertion:
(5) Reasoning:
(6) Analysis in Details by Example:
(7) Introductory Evidence by Declaration:
( 8 ) Maxim:
(9) Analysis in Details (drawing nexus between General and Personal: )
(10) Volunteered vs. Provoked Appearance on the Web:
(11) Conclusion:
(a) Reiteration:
(b) Demand:
(12) Proof of Service:


(1) Issue:

(*) Locking Thread, preventing a member/individual who posted IP (Intellectual Property) from accessing it is improper and contrary to God Given, Unalienable Rights and Law.


(2) Legal Theory:

(a) Case 1:

1. A member posted data.

2. Errors have been made: spelling or otherwise.

3. For Example: wrote instead of meant “I want to feel” “I want to kill"
or wrote
"surrounded by adversity, produced awesome masterpiece of "fart" when meant of "art," etc.

4. The error was unintentional and the member, being active in his/her writings and being pressed for time, has not accurately reviewed line by line to such extend as to capture the error immediately.

5. The post was made public.

6. Later, the Thread was locked by O-M.

7. The member, who re-read posts, suddenly discovered the error, as he/she knows his/her true intent and noticed the bona fide error in “kill” vs. “feel.”

8. The member is prevented from correcting his error.

9. The member may (very high probability) be dragged into very serious consequences, including those of some one involving the Authorities (not for masterpiece of "fart" though,) pursuant to a true belief that a violent threat of HIGH degree has been made.

10. When the thread is locked, the member is “stuck” and is forced by O-M to be portrayed in a wrong light.

11. Thus, O-M is actively engaged in maintaining a false image of the member.

12. Personal emails and notifications are secondary to the real issue of a need of immediate correction of the error(s) –IMMEDIATELY.

(b) Case 2:

13. A member posts a document or a scan of ongoing court action.

14. Circumstances in that action create a different or hostile situation to the member.

15. He/she needs to remove the publicly displayed document/image in order to defend the case better.

16. The Thread is locked – the member cannot delete the document/image.

17. The adversary of the member found out of the document/image some time later and uses that in court vs. the member.

18. The member loses the case and suffers the damages.

19. Had the member been able to delete the data (IP) he/she may have not been damaged.

20. When the member can prove that he/she informed the O-M of his/her necessity to edit/remove IP, and the O-M refused or ignored (the result is the same) the member, is entitled to the compensation of the damages suffered from the O-M hostile actions.

[Sharing Lights]

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:57 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(3) Nexus to my case in Brief:

The above examples(s) are applicable to any appearance on-line: General and Special.


21. I have openly and consistently disclosed more than 3 times (3 strikes rule) that demand my lawful right to control my, own IP.
22. O-M has defaulted.
23. My Sovereign Rights have been violated.
24. Online activity log can be traced via the Host co and internal data.
25. A nexus between the demands by time and lock or unlocking can be established and verified, pursuant to data transmission record, which can be subpoenaed when a need arises.

(4) Logical Assertion:

26. Any reasonably thinking O-M would not subject itself to claim of damages suffered by a member as a result of O-M refusal/default to allow the member access to his/her IP, when a demand has been publicly made, as in my case, all proof retained accurately by post/time/downloads.

(5) Reasoning:

27. It is in the interests of any O-M to shield itself from a possible claim of damages and such liability re: 26.


(6)Analysis in details by example:
See (3,) (7,)

(7) Introductory evidence by declaration:

28. Two persons wrote lies of me or contrary to the facts statements.
29. That data came up via Search Engines online as, majority of posts online are captured by the robots and preserved in the Web’s data banks.

30. Even when active links are deleted, a cache copy may remain for years.
31. The same holds to be true when I post data on any one here.
32. Search engines know no difference; they simply propagate data captured.
33. Everything or about is recorded/preserved on the Web; thus, great need for:
a. reasonable caution and
b. accountability.

34. One person out of two who defamed me amended his bad behavior upon being confronted; the other: Nikky wallowed in her wrong, managing to discredit herself beyond repair.

( 8 ) Maxim:
(translated in its proximity) Some people would rather risk diarrhea than risk admitting being wrong.


(9) Analysis in Details (drawing nexus between General and Personal

35. When one is defamed in a despicable format; so can be many.
36. Since defamation and libel took place behind my back, I confronted the perpetrators here.

37. That could be accomplished only via registering online at this Forum.
38. Any non-member can shadow-browse.
39. Replying requires registering.
40. I had no intentions of browsing at this Forum.
41. I had even less intentions of registering.
42. However, in order to stop the defamation and libel I had to do the above.
43. I did.
44. Therefore, I appeared at this Forum by necessity –not voluntarily in nexus stated.
45. The ownership/management (O-M) allowed the defamation and libel to be posted.
46. These are facts.



47. I like all - have God Given Rights, including those of self-defense.
48. I exercise such.
49. I did so here.
50. Member: Nikky could neither substantiate her accusations nor provide any prima-facie.
51. Nikky could not raise one valid logical argument.
52. Nikky has successfully raised a myriad of illogical and absurd arguments.
53. She continued throwing piles, as that’s all she can manage.
54. To each his/her own.

55. She has talent in piles’ throws in monumental proportions.
56. She may be such an athlete.
57. Professional.
58. Great experience.
59. Can successfully teach others.
60. Talents are respected as it is not that easy to BS so consistently without managing to raise a valid argument even once.
61. Whether positive or negative a talent is a talent.
62. Nikky is very talented indeed.


63. A logical question, “what if Nikky decides to procreate or has done so?
64. The dynasty may be rooted deeply.
65. Some dilemma…
Quote:

66. Whereas defamation and slander vs. me or anyone ware allowed to continue,
67. whereas my rebut required registering as a prerequisite, the rules and regulations of the Forum do not apply to me or others in similar situations as opposed to volunteered and unprovoked appearance.

[Sharing Lights]

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 177

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:58 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(10) Volunteered vs. Provoked Appearance on the Web:

68. Based on the above, my appearance is, then, under a special, limited appearance status in relationship to the Sovereign mode.

69. I am not subjecting myself, voluntarily, to the jurisdiction of the Forum.

70. I appear to defend my rights, being forced to accept the predicates for such defense only in relationship to registering.

71. Can’t defend here if do not register here.
72. It is beneath me to “defend” from far away, reserved for cowards.
73. I face all opponents directly.

74. Being Sovereign and Declaring such via Sui Juris mode, all of my Rights are preserved.

75. This Forum or any have no precedence over them.

76. Based on the legality of the above, having no support in law and on record, no one has any lawful right to infringe on my rights and its output in the Cyberspace –which falls under the Intellectual Property provision i.e. my Posts.

77. Furthermore, I have made a disclosure and placed a virtual lien on my work – IP, retaining all the Rights without giving them to this Forum in any scope.

78. The interaction produces a Contractual relationship: offer and acceptance by both sides giving the greater weight to the party vs. which wrong acts have been committed.

79. Thus, by virtue of defamation and libel, my Rights are Sovereign to this Forum.

80. This Forum (its owners/management: O-M) have no legal right to edit my IP (posts) (Sovereign to them) and/or name.

81. Any editing is undoubtedly an infringement on my IP and copyrighting, violating pertinent laws and regulations.

82. No explicit and implicit clauses are established in favor of the Forum (O-M) regardless of their disclaimers.

83. This Forum (O-M,) however, have their Right to delete posts even of a Sovereign when such clearly state acts of violence or *****graphy, spilling beyond the 1st Amendment.

84. I have not stated such.
85. I have not implied such.

86. In absence of violence and *****, (mild artistic may be ok – not more) the O-M may not "touch" my IP and/or edit it.

87. Under the private Forum clauses, O-M can refuse to accept my offer of the Special Appearance and terminate my registration.

88. The Forum must be stated as Private – not public.


89. However, when any Forum chooses to terminate registration of any member, he/she -

90. the member has to be notified properly and served (on-line service is acceptable in on-line interactions) and given an ample opportunity to withdraw his/her posts (see 83 and 86.)

91. Bi-lateral Rights of both sides are, then, preserved.

92. Yes. Truth, Fairness, and real Law, to me, are above any agenda and Forum.

93. Sui Juris Forum has to follow the same laws.

94. I stand for True Rights of all People above any Forum, and make no exceptions.

95. Using my case, as an actual example (examples are better than remote theories) we can add that editing by O-M without my permission is not proper, creating a

96. Unilateral and always bias and arbitrary conduct by default.

97. Private property (IP) of an on-line member has no less protection than private Property clause of the on-line Forum and vice versa.

98. Rights of both sides are equal.

99. Rights of the party that has sustained damages takes precedence in review.

100. Rights of members who make Special Appearance by virtue of a need to defend vs. hostile acts; thus, have precedence over the rights of General Appearance members who enter into an agreement with O-M voluntarily.

101. Those who make Special Appearance are forced to defend their rights; therefore, non-volunteered appearance negates the general cases clauses of the Forum for General Appearances.

102. Special Appearance is by necessity – not pleasure. (the key phrase.)

[Sharing Lights]

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 177

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:58 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(10) Volunteered vs. Provoked Appearance on the Web:

68. Based on the above, my appearance is, then, under a special, limited appearance status in relationship to the Sovereign mode.

69. I am not subjecting myself, voluntarily, to the jurisdiction of the Forum.

70. I appear to defend my rights, being forced to accept the predicates for such defense only in relationship to registering.

71. Can’t defend here if do not register here.
72. It is beneath me to “defend” from far away, reserved for cowards.
73. I face all opponents directly.

74. Being Sovereign and Declaring such via Sui Juris mode, all of my Rights are preserved.

75. This Forum or any have no precedence over them.

76. Based on the legality of the above, having no support in law and on record, no one has any lawful right to infringe on my rights and its output in the Cyberspace –which falls under the Intellectual Property provision i.e. my Posts.

77. Furthermore, I have made a disclosure and placed a virtual lien on my work – IP, retaining all the Rights without giving them to this Forum in any scope.

78. The interaction produces a Contractual relationship: offer and acceptance by both sides giving the greater weight to the party vs. which wrong acts have been committed.

79. Thus, by virtue of defamation and libel, my Rights are Sovereign to this Forum.

80. This Forum (its owners/management: O-M) have no legal right to edit my IP (posts) (Sovereign to them) and/or name.

81. Any editing is undoubtedly an infringement on my IP and copyrighting, violating pertinent laws and regulations.

82. No explicit and implicit clauses are established in favor of the Forum (O-M) regardless of their disclaimers.

83. This Forum (O-M,) however, have their Right to delete posts even of a Sovereign when such clearly state acts of violence or *****graphy, spilling beyond the 1st Amendment.

84. I have not stated such.
85. I have not implied such.

86. In absence of violence and *****, (mild artistic may be ok – not more) the O-M may not "touch" my IP and/or edit it.

87. Under the private Forum clauses, O-M can refuse to accept my offer of the Special Appearance and terminate my registration.

88. The Forum must be stated as Private – not public.


89. However, when any Forum chooses to terminate registration of any member, he/she -

90. the member has to be notified properly and served (on-line service is acceptable in on-line interactions) and given an ample opportunity to withdraw his/her posts (see 83 and 86.)

91. Bi-lateral Rights of both sides are, then, preserved.

92. Yes. Truth, Fairness, and real Law, to me, are above any agenda and Forum.

93. Sui Juris Forum has to follow the same laws.

94. I stand for True Rights of all People above any Forum, and make no exceptions.

95. Using my case, as an actual example (examples are better than remote theories) we can add that editing by O-M without my permission is not proper, creating a

96. Unilateral and always bias and arbitrary conduct by default.

97. Private property (IP) of an on-line member has no less protection than private Property clause of the on-line Forum and vice versa.

98. Rights of both sides are equal.

99. Rights of the party that has sustained damages takes precedence in review.

100. Rights of members who make Special Appearance by virtue of a need to defend vs. hostile acts; thus, have precedence over the rights of General Appearance members who enter into an agreement with O-M voluntarily.

101. Those who make Special Appearance are forced to defend their rights; therefore, non-volunteered appearance negates the general cases clauses of the Forum for General Appearances.

102. Special Appearance is by necessity – not pleasure. (the key phrase.)

[Sharing Lights]

(11) Conclusion:

103. O-M has no lawful right to infringe on my IP when I entered the forum under the Special Appearance Rule, clearly provoked by the ongoing Defamation and Libel.

104. Locking threads where my IP resides and to which I have not granted explicit or implicit access is improper and unlawful.

105. Locking of Thread as referenced above prevents me from both editing my IP and deleting, when circumstances may change, as Web is interactive.

106. There is always a chance that defamation and libel may be spread further and joined by other members not known at the time of entry (SA - Special Appearance.)

107. Such change in the environment, by default, invokes an option for response.

108. A response to a change in environment on–line may require a change in posts placed prior to new or other members entering the dispute.

109. All changes are subjected to the laws of Bi-lateral interaction.
110. Void of such, creates discrimination vs. one side, which is unlawful.

111. Discrimination while Defamation and libel are active voids any Private Forum Rules, as the Uniformed Constitutional Right for self-defense prevails over greatly varied.

112. re: Private Forum Rules.
113. Constitutional Rights always supersede any private laws and/or Statutes.

114. My posts are my IP.
115. I have been defamed.
116. I can and am defending myself.
117. My God Given Rights are intact.
118. So are yours.
119. My Constitutional Rights are intact.
120. So are yours.
121. The above supersede private laws of Forums.

122. My IP belongs to me - not Forum unless I state on record
123. that sell or transfer such rights for monetary compensation or otherwise.

124. I have not transferred or sold my Rights to this Forum (O-M.)

125. Forum’s Unilateral Rules do not apply to Special Appearance due to necessity and upon a provocation.


(a) Reiteration:

126. I do not grant implicit or explicit rights to edit/alter or block my IP to anyone - such is my God/Nature Given Right, as IP was descended upon me by God/Nature not upon others and vice versa.
127. All Right Reserved Without Prejudice.
128. My Rights are Sovereign.
129. I am Sui Juris.
130. I am not a corporate entity.

(b) Demand:

131. Preventing me from editing or deleting my, IP (my posts, hereto) is, thus – unlawful.

132. I demand access to my posts which are locked in violation of my Rights to my, personal intellectual property (IP.)

133. My demand is reasonable and legitimate.
134. My demand helps to establish precedence for others, regardless of Forums to be aware of their REAL rights – not what any one would like you to believe.

135. My intents are sincere and always to protect Rights of ALL in similar situations.
136. I only make my, Personal case public when such serves the interest of many in similar situations.

137. It is in the interests of any O-M to take advantage of my research and protect itself from possible further claims of members, when such may lead to considerable monetary loss to a claim of damages when such could be substantiated by a record.

138. My disclosure is; thus, beneficial to many, particularly to those who rely on common sense.

(12) Proof of Service:

139. This e-transmission - as is - (all proof is accurately retained.)

o-m - owners-managers