The Lawyers Began Terrorism vs. self-represented Who Expose Their Racketeering

[Sharing Lights]

I am in receipt of certain, new development in the New York which, depending on the outcome may:

1. uphold
the Sovereign Rights of the Americans

or

2. would turn the non-lawyers into almost slaves with no
Rights before the unconstitutional Aristocracy, which
has usurped complete control of the judicial system and
how to utilize it to its advantage over the Country.



At stakes are:

These "unethical" lawyers cover up the fact that they deceptively and
in sheer fraud alter the damages and injury they or their client have sustained
in unlawfully obtaining our Private Data, which they use to collect, as they call
"responsibilities we avoid"
(as if we have any responsibility before racketeers)

They intend to propel the non-lawyers into the dark
age beyond suspension of the Constitutionals Rights.
They are committing the treason vs. the US Constitution
under protection of their membership card - under color of law.

They have already threaten, as perceived under the un-sophisticated Consumer status,
criminal persecution of any self-represented
litigant or even an individual who writes on Forums for daring to, educationally:

as exposure of their,
Unconstitutional Acts is a threat to end their siphonic milking of the US Consumers senselessly.



Some may say that the houses they buy, expensive cars they drive, and cloth is, virtually,
filled with blood of the US Consumers they grind in their web of fraud,
where they do not produce proof of the alleged, damages but demand payments
to them by fraud and coercion, satisfying racketeering prong.


The Consumers who have received the stated and implied threats from Malen & Associates, P.C.
are willing to go forward and have given their consent to publish the scans of virtual assault
by these NY lawyers.


I would publish them and what these thugs, utilizing their connection with some corrupt judges
try to accomplish by-passing Constitutional Laws, manipulating their Statutes and Codes,
however not by true applicability but, still, in deception and fraud.

That's all they know.

I can't say that these lawyers have began a war on non-lawyers, which is the overwhelming majority
of this Country but they have utilized, virtually, terrorists Acts,
using outright threats and fascists tactics to accomplish their wicked and evil goal
to extort non-sustained damages-injury.

They do so by proclaiming that any non-lawyer, who

of practicing UPL - Law Without a License,

implying a prison term and
[ready for this one?]
not being able to associate freely and conduct private, personal affairs
unless a judge signs such Agreement.

I would post the evidence later on after receive the scans, verified by court's pleadings.


The "heroes" who obtained lawyers Membership card
to embezzle monies from US Consumers under a pretext of lawful collections and
damages/injuries sustained
are once again:

PS. It is unlawful and improper to
harass even those who extort, while they hold membership card.


Therefore, the data is posted for educational and self-awarenesses purposes only
and no unlawful activity is endorsed.

All Parities are not, officially, guilty until guilt is proven in accordance with the
Constitutional Laws only.

[weishaupt1776]

In the bitter end of things, they like to go back (in a tacit way) to the presumption that one is a "citizen of the United States who is 'residing' in a state" pursuant to the 14th Amendment.

They presume that one consents with what they are doing by not objecting to the status as being one of "their" citizens

[Sharing Lights]

The real war is going to be about the UPL vs extortion
under the diversion of real issue to the former, bogus claim.

Under the present circumstances, the Consumers would concentrate on simple, basic notions:

1. The First Amendment is sacred and intact.

2. These lawyers extort.

3. They refuse to place Admissible Evidence of damages-injury by actual number.

4. They provide unverified scans.

5. They refuse and fail to place the Original Promissory Note.

6. They refuse and fail to place the Actual Assignment showing the damage-injury
sustained for obtaining the Assignment.

7. Affidavit confirming the alleged debt composed by
lawyers for illiterate thug siting at Asset Acceptance who claim to be an Officer is perjury,
as he can't have first hand knowledge unless worked for the bank and maintained
the actual account in dispute.

8. Respondent does not waive a right for cross-examination.

9. No admissible evidence - prima facie is placed on record by plaintiffs.

10. Plaintiff - a foreign corporation with no Forum Contacts has a standing in New York Courts.

11. Plaintiff proceed in fraud under unclean hands doctrine.

12. Plaintiff used fraud and deception in all Opposing paper, including a non-supported by
law bogus claim that

The Consumers would stay with the basics.


As for these racketeers, may hell freeze over but
only slaves would kneel before them and their extortion - The People Are Sayeth Naught!
We are going for massive and honest exposure of these thugs on all levels:

DA,
AG,
IG,
FBI,
DOJ,
DCA,
FTC,
the State's Elected Body,
Media: major local newspapers and TV Stations.

Racketeers of Malen: I know you are reading it, as you

registered at the Forums under a false veil to
implement your, unauthorized surveillance on Free People of the US.

You copy - scan posts of various members here and move in fraud to claim UPL in NY.



We would expose your fraud by revealing your,
own fraud and may the real evidence reveal
who violates laws in reality
and who avoids responsibilities - you or us?

If you think your threats and plots to have us arrested would bring us to our knees, you are wrong!

We would expose you that much harder until you are disbarred, as you broke more
than enough laws already.
There have not been one promise made to you which has not been implemented.


So would be the others.

We fight fairly and honestly - we are not you.


Massive exposure till news carry you names is
a just and warranted reply, as you breached the sacred.

You have threatened the People with their Right to speak-write freely and live in extortion
free environment,

where you purchase evidence of unverified debt
and falsely alleging being your clients representatives, collect for yourself.

You would prove it yourself even if try to launder monies
unlawfully collected offshore.


When the investigation would commence, as it would, evidence would surface.


You can't hide it all.



The Authorities , if doubt Consumers, would compare court's docket with judgments obtained merely
on your pleadings without prima facie but in reliance on unverified scans and perjuries-affidavits of
thugs working for your clients and paid by them.


Liars in contrast to true competent fact witnesses,
would lead to you and likes of you.

And subpoenaed documents would prove that the Assignments (sums) just do not match
pleaded by you injuries.

You lied and you know it.

And that is why you are going nuts trying to divert attention into UPL.

You and we know that you, fraud artists pay pennies on a dollar for unverified copies obtained
of the alleged debt.

Who told you that only lawyers are allowed to study economics and commerce?

Do yo believe that we are going to be intimidated by you
and try to prove in court innocence of being self-reliant
and educated?

Is that a burden?

Really?

Most of lawyers charge high fees and keep them regardless of the outcome.

That is fraud by itself, as monies should be charged for deliverance not promise!

Your only hope might have been under current Statues
if we posed as lawyers, which we do not and if we charged monies for legal advice.

But we share educational data freely and have stated numerous
times that our Posts are not legal advice.

Who the hell are you to tell us what to write, whom to see, what who to associate and what to think?

You are traitors of what this country has been founded on.

And you expect us to live in fear of you?

What else?


If you claim we are wrong,

submit the Assignments with sums paid matching what you
extort in courts.

No, you wold rather throw in your premeditated and fraudulent claim of the UPL hoping that
we would expand energy on that and those judges who "help you
for you helping them" would derail us.


Whom are you bull****ting?


If you had legitimate proof, you would have welcomed Discovery but
you resist it as there is no tomorrow.

You know well when your fraud would surface there would be no tomorrow for you indeed
to continue extorting under your membership card you betrayed as well.

I do wonder if there is one honest judge in that court?

I would, definitely, know when see one and believe that day would come!

Honor to that judge(s) and dishonor to the corrupt ones!






Amen!

[Sharing Lights]

DISCLAIMER:

The following is not a legal advice, as anything else
Posted on Free Forums in a Free, Democratic Country of the US
but a series of Educational and Awareness Raising Articles -a part of my -
E-book, posted freely for non-commercial use.

When project is completed, a hard copy would be printed too.

The lawyers and debt collectors firms which extort from
the Consumers,

A Violation the above would be persecuted to the full extent of the law, serving as
prima facie for disbarment of the lawyers at public discussion.


The Consumers in discussion are not members of the State's Bar [fact]
and are not subjected to its, internal Rules and Regulations, however,
recognizing the Authority of the Constitutional Laws only under the Pledge
to defend the latter for ALL similarly situated.

In Unity and Benevolence, the Consumers are willing to go forward and Associate Freely
with all who are being extorted by any lawyers who collect deceptively and fraudulently
stating damages-injuries under as false veil;
that they [the lawyers] collect

[reprinted]

Any doubts?

I took the assault on Consumers so personally
after witnessed first hand the depth of corruption of the
court system [notwithstanding those judges who follow law and whom I have not yet met]
that I would continue researching and publishing the evidence till the Justice prevails.
Major Agencies and Civil Rights Organizations are being contacted, evidence of
threats of imprisonment for researching and publishing educational Articles and
books on-line or offline accurately retained and submitted.

Proof of Service is accurately retained with accurate copies of the submissions as well.



Any further acts and threats of imprisonment in violation the First Amendment by
the lawyers of M&A may result in appearances before the Grand Jury
and People's Jury where both sides may present evidence fully.

You can count on that we would seek Justice fully!

Any way look at it, I would stand by the Consumers' affected in unyielded stand,
refusing to kneel before the threats and would follow my Constitutional Duty to uphold it
vs. the traitors who undermine it by racketeering vs.
the People of the US for whom the Constitution was written for -
not for "unethical" lawyers to usurp it in their self-interests in subversion.

Lawyers of M&A, as you lurk here, - I would testify in any Proceedings involving
the Consumers as a competent fact witness,
to the matters I have witnessed first hand
and as one of the top researchers on the country on Debt Collections, as my work speaks for itself.

We are confident that we would prove that your pleadings are fraud and deception
in premeditated acts with no room for bona fide errors, as yo have been given more than
ample opportunities to investigate fully.


You refused.

We are confident in Rights of all Americans to

We are confident that

vs. any assault on their rRghts by lawyers or any one, and do so in Free Associations,
which you call - UPL.

and, we are submitting the data to the FBI and DOJ upon mutual consent so that any
endangering life or welfare acts vs us, would lead to you.
[it is not us who break the laws; therefore we have nothing to fear]

Outside sources would retain files of the case, as well as
such are being posted on Forums.

An arrest of even one Guardian of the Constitutional Rights would result in

on how lawyers abuse law to gain
criminal advantage in a civil matter of debt collection.

We understand fully that you fight for your position
at Courts to

You know we know your "game!"

If you do not comprehend that -you are in denial.

We advocate no violence but Justice only!

[Sharing Lights]

The Consumers were so outraged by the constant harassment and extortion
by the racketeers of M&A who refuse to provide Admissible Proof of their claims
that permission to publish the case has been granted on the condition that
personal data is non-visible (edited in that scope only.)

The case is presented as prima facie of extortion and how these lawyers, under veil of law,
extort and BS beyond imagination.


Their sense of total unaccountability and entrenchment of established connections
is so deep that they resort to anything but not to follow real law.

I do not believe that this is bravery, as bravery is based
on deep, personal beliefs, while

I believe that these fraud artists have never met any, meaningful oppositions and

Why should they stop now, particularly when
some Consumers dared to stand up for their Riights?


You would see that these racketeers with license to break the law, issued an implied
threat of imprisonment for "daring"

Just read your self how far they go.

Only one things.

The Consumers refuse to extortion and would expose the
thugs to the full extent.

May life judge who breaks the laws in reality.

Analysis of fraud by these lawyers is presented below in Educational format.

[aksis]

Sharing Lights,

Server certified copy of the de jure 13th on all those esquires.

http://www.amendment-13.org


Much Love,

Christopher Theodore: Rhodes

[Sharing Lights]

Educational, United Response by the Consumers US- the Guardians of the Constitution:

1. Thus, no bona fide error may be claimed.

2. False. Agent appeared but was unlawfully DE-railed and his, Civil Rights have been violated.

3 a) Perjury be the council in full awareness.

Unless he witnessed the transactions himself, he Pleads under Oath premeditated, false statements
to the detriment to the Consumer in attempt to profit on the pleadings by this council.

Attorney may not testify and be fact witness and councils for his/her client in the same lawsuit.

3 b) Respondent disputed the alleged debt numerous times prior and during the lawsuit.

No verifiable and admissible evidence has been provided by Asset and M&A, thus, another false statement is
made by the same council.

Record of dispute, proof of service, and witness statements are accurately retained and
have been submitted to the Court and Authorities.

Furthermore, both Asset and M&A began theri extortion, prior to obtaining license as
debt collectors in New York.

Proof of conflicting dates of licensing and extortion by mail are retained.

3 c) False. Cemented defense has been submitted timely, remaining UN-rebutted point for point.

Burden of proof is on the plaintiffs.

Council proceeds in deception and fraud.

3 d) Compound statement.

Agent appeared -proof is available.

The Respondent has been harassed.

The court has no subject matter jurisdiction.

Neither court nor council have established such.

The Verified Answer has been submitted by the Respondent timely, remaining UN-rebutted.

Therefore, the plaintiffs are in default.

Trial court erred in denying OSC, as respondent's right have been violated and prejudiced.

She has exercised her right to plead in writing -not by oral argument.

She sent the Agent, being full time working individual in a medical office, whereas her absence
jeopardizes patients, work of the office, and her position as an employee, while the lawyers of M&A
harass purposefully by frivolous and, yes, harassing lawsuit so that the Consumer is cornered into two options:
I: to pay the extortion or II: be dragged through purposefully delayed litigation in order to jeopardize her employment.

The judge has not reviewed evidence, has not ruled on Pleadings on record by both sides but, merely,
denied OSC by virtue of not accepting additional written Affidavits from the Respondent and
her due Right for Discovery.

Whereas, court failed to address the issue of Discovery, while mere pleadings of Attorney
are taken as prima face, court has lost subject mater jurisdiction over the case.

3 e) "remedy the matter"

Would that be to pay up the extortion demands?

The Respondent dispute of the alleged debt remains standing in truth and full force UN-rebutted.
The plaintiffs remain in default in failure to submit Admissible evidence of their claims.

"frivolous documents found on INTERNET..."

Council is testifying for Respondent without such Authority.

The Respondent has never granted the council or any one the Right to testify on
her behalf, notwithstanding written agreements in her position.

The source of Defendant's for production evidence and to substantiate the claims
upon which relief is sough is a Right of any Defendant, whether represented by an attorney or not.

Source of such is FRCP, CPLR, and Appellate Courts decisions.

How and where such are obtained by the Consumer so of the US is none of the
council's and his accomplices' business and they have no jurisdiction over rights of the PEOPLE to
defend themselves vs. extortion by these lawyers or what they read, write, and collect.

Council infringes on private affairs of the People, calling deceptively anything exposing his fraud
and extortion as frivolous, while his acts are criminal and well beyond frivolous.

3 f. Council continues a pattern of deception and manipulations of laws.

He knows well that void of Answer leads to default judgment.

Jurisdiction must be established by plaintiff, as that is the law.

Denial of fraudulent claims is not a waver of Rights and Due Process.

Furthermore, the Respondent has stated

"Invoking Rights and Privileges of
Affected Consumers individually and as
a Group and/or Class by Special
Appearance only and Representation"

thus, a second prong of lack of subject mater jurisdiction, unless placed by support in law,
on record by plaintiffs, is established as well.

[Sharing Lights]

3 g. Restating the answer of 3 a and 3 b.
Reiterating the fact: the Respondent sent her Agent to submit her Documents and such
is permissible by law, which has been violated.

3 h. A repeated allegation by council as if repetitions add merit (..?)

Repeating the response in 3 d.

False.

All inhabitants of the US have aright to appear in Civil courts of US, being Civilians.
Furthermore,, the agent has the Delegated Power of Authority notarized by the Respondent.
The Agent followed the provisions he has been entrusted with but unlawfully blocked by court,
arbitrarily aiding the plaintiff.

Private agreements and delegation of the scope of Authority among the People is internal affairs of the People.

Neither the council not the Court have the authority to command the People how they may chose
trusting each other and/or have been entrusted with - while nether rights of the council
nor of the Court have been infringed upon by the People in return.

The former, thus, have no Right to infringe on the People 's Rights either.

Council testified again on behalf of the Respondent who denies the council such right,
while he pleaded perjurous statements, contradicting the Respondent's acts and intent.

The council continues to imply that only a member of the State's Bar -
a lawyer has the trust and authority of the Respondent.

The Respondent categorically denies such, absurd allegations and states that
"she has not met a lawyer yet whom she could trust!!!"

The council is the epiphany of the above whose acts, literally, made the Respondent vomit!

See the Affidavit of "throwing up."

3 i. Respondent finds council's conduct beyond unethical bypassing the threshold of being obnoxious.

The council has neither right nor authority to state on the Respondent''s behalf her reasons for filing OSC
and/or when, why, and how she may or may not do so.

She is being harassed and extorted by thugs possessing lawyers' membership card who engage
in any unlawful activity but refuse and fail to produce Admissible evidence of their allegations,
presenting their pleadings and mere theories of why monies should be deposited
in their private accounts as LAW and PRIMA FACIE!

The issue remains:
"what have plaintiffs placed on record warranting them a relief?"


4. "Agreement"

Demanded to be produced but refused by plaintiff, serving as prima facie of extortion.

"Citibank - assignor"

Assignment has been refused to be be produced even though dully demanded.

Council is willing to throw in under premeditated deception bogus claims of
the Respondent's damages by her Agent under UPL
(while she has no complaints herself and objects
ANY FALSE testimony on her behalf)
and "wars on Mars" and "effect of lunar eclipses on constipation on Earth"
[figuratively speaking] but refuses to produce the
Assignment and Agreement- the Promissory Note.

The reasons are self-evident.

The Respondent has nor defaulted as sent an Agent who appeared but was, purposefully DE-railed,
denying Due Process.

The Respondent is not in default as long as her Pleadings have been timely submitted and
are UN-rebutted, while no prof of claim is placed on record, warranting a judgment to the plaintiffs
as a matter of law!

Such are facts.

All acts by plaintiffs who engage in sheer racketeering and fraud are void and nullity;
so is any aid by any accomplices in Court.

5. Anther deception, as record proves so.

The Respondent has disputed the allegations of debt numerous times. ( see court;s docket and
evidence of certified submissions to plaintiffs signatures obtained.)

However, instead of producing the demanded Promissory Note and Assignment,
the plaintiffs continued extortion via the harassing action in court.

"stated the amount due and owing"

Another fraud and deception.

Racketeering demands by individuals holding State's and membership card is not
proof of damages-injuries for which they can or should be reimbursed.

Production of the Promissory Note and Assignment proving the damage
of the plaintiff is mandatory and not discretionary, as has been consistently ruled by
the appellate Courts.


A reminder such references to law are claimed by the council in his deception as
"frivolous and from the Internet"
as if that changes rulings of the Appellate Courts!?

Council may believe that his deception is EVIDENCE and VALIDATION in right to collect,
whereas common people call such acts and words' play as plain bull****.

"The defendant can provide no evidence that the amount is incorrect."

What's next: the Defendant can provide no evidence that the council does not comprehend
the meaning of the words "honesty, morals, decency, extortion is wrong, acts must be justified
not deceived, etc..."

That is self-evident by acts.

Acts speak as evidence - not shallow words manipulated by council as roils of toilet paper
in a store - which one is thicker?

The ACT ON RECORD remains that both: the Respondent disputed the debt, demanding production of the
Promissory Note and Assignment together with General Ledge and complete Accounting
so that plaintiffs may substantiate their, unverified claims.

The plaintiffs refused an fail to produce such.

The burden of proof is, unquestionably, remains on the plaintiffs who, deceptively, try to shift it on
the Respondent to plead the plaintiffs bogus case for them by "doing their work."



Would council himself pay any one who tells him pay because said so and produces an unverified scan
of a Consumer with a similar name but not even the same without producing the stated by
the council AGREEMENT (the promissory note) and the ASSIGNMENT.

Where are they?

6. The plaintiffs placed no shred of Admissible and Authenticated evidence
of their bogus claim but continue reversing the tables.

"her frivolous motion"
Demand fro production of evidence which any legitimate plaintiff would only welcome as
that speeds up the case and illuminates controversy is called as frivolous.

Whereas, the plaintiffs' wiggling and desperate attempt to resort to even challenging
the First Constitutional Amendment but not to produce the Promissory Note -
THE AGREEMENT and ASSIGNMENT is a pearl of theri PRIMA FACIE
defying the Appellate Courts, virtually telling them - "you are wrong - we are right -
councils' pleadings are prima facie Let's redefine FRCP and CPLR just for us and our eyes only!"

"Now give us the monies demanded - our accounts are opened and we are ready
to wash them offshore before the FBI gets on our case."

"Not the proper party"


The evidence with Affidavits have been entrusted tot he Agent to show to the court
but unlawfully denied blocking the Discovery.

Frankly, the plaintiffs do not want neither see the evidence, nor produce it -
they chose deception instead.

Unwarranted dragging through the unnecessary appearances when plaintiffs are in default and
refuse to produce Authenticated evidence is contrary to laws, while
bogus Affidavits by debt collectors employed by debt collators who have not,
personalty, maintained the alleged account and can't possibly have first hand knowledge,
as, falsely, pleaded in their perjurous statements, composed for them by their lawyers
are of no probative valuebut should be of interest to the Investigative Authorities.

The Agent appeared to submit Respondent's additional Documents and
collect evidence from the plaintiffs by Respondent's instructions.

Default remains on plaintiffs, thus.

[Sharing Lights]

We would analyze this pearl of attorneys of MALEN & ASSOCIATES later.
meanwhile just pay attention how they moved from
"exporting thugs" to "criminal" mode openly threatening the Agent.


They managed to redefine what could and stated that
"appearing in Court under penal code section 270."

So, according to this wizards of law, who may believe that having a States Bar members card
has them the right to assault, by power of monopolized law, the People in the daylight
any one who appears ion New York courts, while not being a lawyer is under
Penal Code and may tried for such crime and imprisoned.

We would make sure that these threats by criminals - thugs would appear in
all major newspapers.

Media all the way now.

You, lawyers of M&A declare a war on the People and threaten us?

We would threaten no one - WE SHALL EXPOSE YOU FOR WHO YOU TRULY ARE!

Rather you are doing it yourself.

So, help yourself!


That's all and; yet, that much...





The other references to the INTERNET was assault on Rights of Free Forums,
specifically referring to SuiJuris.net and S-u-i-j-u-i-r-i--s-c-l-u-b.n-e-t

They began scanning and copying posts here at some time but evidence showed that
12-21-2007 about 2 pm was the deceptive use of the resources posing as a legitimate members.

At times of such unprecedented assault on People's rights by these thugs committing treason vs.
Our Constitution, we call upon unity and firm stand to out of control lawyers who moved
beyond extortion but extort and threaten any one who reads and writes on INTERNET or at library
on-line or off it - "daring" to defend our, Constitutional Rights, and then goes to court as a non-lawyer!

Extraordinary!

I, personally, have not seen or read anything like it it, yet, since Reading of how Hitler used
burning of Reichstag to blame it on all non-members of his party, after which massive arrests began.

This Hitlerism, we are encountering now is occurring at the edge of 2007-08.

These thugs must be disbarred.

Nothing less.


If they would be protected by their "Union," then, may the People learn the truth who endorses
what in this country nowadays and which winds are blowing?

We would prove that by evidence, as these lawyers registered here as members and
proceed in criminal mode.



PS. It make sense to identify new members around that time or about from New York,
IP traceable to the area:

12-21-2007 about 2 pm on both Forums.

Malen & Associates, P.C.
Address: 123 Frost St
Westbury, NY 11590-5027
Phone: (516) 479-5947 Fax: (516) 681-8578

It may wise to issue a Disclaimer that

any attorney attempting to use our resources
must disclose the status of being an attorney,

as this is a Consumer Forum
where the People have been predominately abused by unethical lawyers.

They keep their resources away from us, they may read ours but not to threaten us as a result
of such deceptive use.

I suggest you, Moderators and Administration take this very, very seriously, as these thugs are not playing around.

They vacuum clean millions of dollars from the Consumers and, obviously, - do not want to relinquish such
"privilege," as they know we understand how they operate in fraud; therefore, we are a threat to their reign
by power of self-education.

Thugs would go to any length as morals is term they do not study or comprehend.


Restrain from any activity or comments that could be interpret it as threats
to them, while retain the Freedom of Expression, as we would not kneel before the traitors of our Constitution!

The scan below is "AS IS" to be retained as evidence.

Concentrate on 9. and 10. below and judge for yourself.

Copy to your PC and save.

[Sharing Lights]