01-12-2008, 07:14 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,111
|
|
|
and..
whats more, not only are vehicles defined by their use in the 50 states, but abroad as well- having researched other countries VC it s the same everywhere: what makes a particular class of vehicle exist is the definition that it be used for a certain purpose...and they all use the word transportation.
Back to Admiralty
Not Admiralty? Ok, then Special Inland Marine law. Maritime.
Since Fed IRS taxes are by analogy to their UK counterpart, "INLAND REVENUE",
revenue cases being Admiralty,
and States impose the exact same taxes, piggybacking on the same issue,
then it must be possible for the States to somehow be involved with Admiralty.
As far as vehicles... I think the "saving to suitors" clause applies to both Admiralty and Maritime.
besides the diversity of the parties, but that's something else altogether.
Last edited by farmer_giles_of_ham : 01-12-2008 at 07:26 PM.
|
01-13-2008, 12:51 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,308
|
|
You got called.
You defaulted.
 |
01-13-2008, 01:56 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,308
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pure Trust
Quote:
...not need to divulge my name.
|
Quote:
|
... of giving up your name.
|
|
Caught with unclean hands?
Every time?
Called for proof of claim?
Tacit procuration agreement?
Red herring?
Default?
Simple enough?
  |
01-13-2008, 02:22 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,308
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pure Trust
Quote:
First there is no way in hell that there is a god given unalienable right to own a firearm.
That is the by far the stupidest thing ever posted.
That is to say that god made with the firearm in mind.
God given un/in-alienable right?
Stupid and no more to suggest such.
God never gave the right of firearm ownership.
If so... Prove it.
|
Where, precisely, did I mention God?
More red-herring tactical rhetorical artifice?
Quote:
|
Now I understand that you cannot see that the 2nd should be read as "...shall not be infringed on the US."
|
Does it say what it says or does it say what YOU say it " should" say?
Quote:
|
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
|
How, and why, precisely, and with specific particularity is that printed below...how it "should be read?"
Quote:
|
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed on the US.
|
What sense does that make as a statement?
Can you diagram the sentence and show its grammatically functional meaning, as YOU have apparently re-written it?
Do you propose to re-write the entire Constutution as YOU say "it should be read?"
Haven't the Tory Loyalist bastard Esquire attorneys done enough damage to the organic document?
Quote:
That is because the entire tenor of the bill of rights is against the US and almost none of it applies to the states.
|
Quote:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;
and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States,
shall be the supreme Law of the Land;
and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
|
Quote:
|
It is about how easy these concepts are for everybody but you.
|
Can you/will you with precisely specific particularty prove your claim?
|
 
Last edited by mrg : 01-13-2008 at 03:01 AM.
|
01-13-2008, 02:54 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,019
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pure Trust
I am Cody James of Robers,
I was born in mission hills Califiornia where a certificate of live birth was made documenting it.
|
I, for one, would certainly like to see a birth certificate in this name. If you don't want to make it public simply PM a url where I can view it.
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
|
01-13-2008, 02:56 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,308
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pure Trust
OK! I asked you to prove you were not a lying attorney shyster and you defaulted.
|
Prove a negative?
Can't you quit whining and crying like a "girly man" when you cannot prove your claim?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pure Trust
It funny what people will say when their work is challenged
|
Funny "funny," or funny "ha ha?"
"It not" so funny maybe?
Last edited by mrg : 01-13-2008 at 03:09 AM.
|
01-13-2008, 09:49 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pure Trust
You are a snake and a liar. You are a coward. You have not provided evidence against these claims.
You are a nobody. Unless you count total cowardice and total shystering as something.
|
Yet you, yourself, provide false, misleading, inaccurate information in an attempt to prove that you are who you are not. Who then is really the liar?
The following information was received via public records for the address you provided as your own. For those wanting to validate my information, use the following url, and post the information that Cody James of Robers provided as an address. http://www.acgov.org/MS/prop/index.aspx
List Property Address
Street Number 3011Street Name San Pablo Street Type Boulevard Unit Number City Oakland
(e.g., 1221) (e.g., Main, 10th) (e.g., Street, Blvd.) (e.g., 101, A) (e.g., Fremont, Oakland)
No information found on the above address. Please verify the property address.
In a second attempt to locate the address, I intentionally left off the assignment of Street Type and received the following results:
To review property assessment information, or parcel map, enter a parcel number, or address of the property and press the submit button. View Parcel Number or Parcel Map Enter the Parcel Number:
( Enter Parcel Number as shown on your tax bill )
List Property Address
Street Number 3011 Street Name San Pablo Street Type Unit Number City Oakland
(e.g., 1221) (e.g., Main, 10th) (e.g., Street, Blvd.) (e.g., 101, A) (e.g., Fremont, Oakland)
No information found on the above address. Please verify the property address.
|
01-13-2008, 10:26 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Interesting, neither mapquest, yahoo or google maps have any problem locating that address (although on google the location is listed as being in Emeryville.
http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp...y=US&geodiff=1
http://maps.yahoo.com/map?q1=3011%20...land%20Ca%20US
http://maps.google.com/
Could it be the goobermint's databases are incomplete/inaccurate/wrong? I can state from first hand experience (and on multiple instances) they screw things up on the data entry side.
I believe you guys are spending way too much time and energy on this, but if you've got free time on your hands to pursue such matters, go for it.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|
01-13-2008, 10:35 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,148
|
|
The problem is not with the government website, but rather, in the information provided. To wit: Oakland (specified by Pure Trust) is not the same as Emeryville. Therefore, my statements remain accurate. PureTrust has provided inaccurate, misleading information. Such an act is an act of deception, telling a lie.
Jerry
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FreeFromContract
|
|
01-13-2008, 11:03 AM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
You are making a presumption Jerry. Presumption that the government is right and the information provided by Pure Trust is wrong.
So let me straighten this out for everyone.
I, personally, mailed a document to Cody James at the address provided and it was not returned to me as being "undeliverable". Further, Cody James acknowledged via private e-mail that he received it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts
The problem is not with the government website, but rather, in the information provided. To wit: Oakland (specified by Pure Trust) is not the same as Emeryville. Therefore, my statements remain accurate. PureTrust has provided inaccurate, misleading information. Such an act is an act of deception, telling a lie.
Jerry
|
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
Last edited by FreeFromContract : 01-13-2008 at 11:14 AM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
