What do you people think about this?

[David Merrill]

I like the idea of some dramatic changes in English accompanying the printing press. That part is pretty cool and maybe significant to the Bible Story.

I have attached a great map from National Geographic.


I also found some images from the Sepher Yesirah. The edition by AMORC seems pretty literal. As much as I do not care for AMORC as authentic Rosicrucianism, I do like this translation.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[psholtz]

Very interesting post, David.

Commenting on the Notes you posted to the Sefer Yetzirah, and about the cabbalistic 32 and so forth, it's interesting to note that the human spine has 33 vertebrae in it.

I've also heard the number 33 explained in the sense of Sun worship as follows: we know that Jesus began his ministry at the age of 30, and died at the age of 33. Apparently, when the Sun rises in the East, it rises on the 30th degree; when it sets in the West, it sets on the 33rd degree.

Haven't been able to confirm this.. it seems to that this would only hold true at certain latitudes or at certain times of the year, but I thought it was interesting.

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/hebrew1.html

http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/hebrew.html

(excerpt from below)

THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE EARLY IRISH-CELTIC AND THE SECOND CENTURY, B.C., HEBREW- PHOENICIAN LANGUAGE, AS SHOWN BY THE PENULUS OF PLAUTUS:

PHOENICIAN OF PLAUTUS:

Byth lym mo thym nociothii nel ech an ti daisc machon

Ys i do iebrim thyfe lyth chy lya chon temlyph ula.

EARLY IRISH-CELTIC:

Beth liom' mo thime nociaithe, niel ach an ti dairie mae coinne

Is i de leabhraim tafach leith, chi lis con teampluibh ulla.

LANGUAGE LINK

In the 18th century, historians discovered exciting proof of Phoenician-Celtic ties. An ancient Roman dramatist, Titus Maccius Plautus (died 184 B.C.) wrote a play, the Penulus in which he placed then current Phoenician into the speech of one of his characters. In the 18th century, linguists noticed the great similarity between that Phoenician and the early Irish Celtic language. In the adjacent box is a sample given by historian Thomas Moore's, History of Ireland, showing the connection between these languages. Leading 18th and 19th century scholars, such as Gen. Charles Vallancey, Lord Rosse, and Sir William Betham, also wrote on this subject. Vallancey, for instance, speaks of, 'The great affinity found in many words, nay whole lines and sentences of this speech, between the Punic [Phoenician] and the Irish.' Famed historian, George Rawlinson, added that this and other inscriptions are 'READILY EXPLICABLE, IF HEBREW BE ASSUMED AS THE KEY TO THEM, BUT NOT OTHERWISE.'(Phoenicia, p. 327)

THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE EARLY IRISH-CELTIC AND THE SECOND CENTURY, B.C., HEBREW- PHOENICIAN LANGUAGE, AS SHOWN BY THE PENULUS OF PLAUTUS:

PHOENICIAN OF PLAUTUS:

Byth lym mo thym nociothii nel ech an ti daisc machon

Ys i do iebrim thyfe lyth chy lya chon temlyph ula.

EARLY IRISH-CELTIC:

Beth liom' mo thime nociaithe, niel ach an ti dairie mae coinne

Is i de leabhraim tafach leith, chi lis con teampluibh ulla.

In 1772, General Charles Vallancey, a leading Irish scholar of the day, published his famous work, Essay On The Antiquity Of The Irish Language, Being A Collation Of The Irish With The Punic (Hebrew) Language.-In his opening remarks he states, 'On a collation of the Irish with the Celtic, Punic, Phoenician and Hebrew languages, the strongest affinity, (nay a perfect Identity in very many Words) will appear, it may therefore be deemed a Punic-Celtic compound.' Vallancey continues, 'from the Hebrew proceeded the Phoenician, from the Phoenician, Carthaginian, or Punic was derived the Aeolian, Dorian and Etruscan and from these was formed the Latin ... Of the Roman Saxon capital letters, the Irish use but three, all the others bear a very great resemblance to the primitive Hebrew and Phoenician.' (p. 2-3) Modern language scholars have confirmed that there is a definite connection between the Celtic and Hebrew, as we have shown in our tract, Hebrew And English.

[keuka77]

Originally Posted by rottweiler

Who Controls the Federal Reserve System? Read on.

The Federal Reserve System is divided into two parts: the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, located in Washington DC, and the Federal Reserve District Banks, located throughout the United States. ...

This extreme numerical over-representation of Jews among the members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents cannot be explained away as a coincidence or as the result of mere random chance. You must ask yourself how it came to be that an incredibly small ethnic minority that only represents about 2% of the American population has total control over the money supply and monetary system of the United States, and thereby total control of the entire economic activity of the nation. Think about it.

The "definition" of "jew" and all the history discussed in here is fascinating, but am not sure it addresses Rott's original observation, and the questions it raises. Trooper's first reply regarding a front group to protect those behind the Green Curtain is meaningful, and should lead to a discussion about those behind that curtain, and not a diversion into the bible, semantics, etc. about everything but the Reserve.

I would love a return to this aspect of the thread - the who, what, why and how does the overwhelming number of jewish-oriented members of these 2 groups really mean to the activities of the Fed. Reserve.

Please don't hate-on-me for asking this! I believe that understanding the implications of this when reviewed in tandem with the Reserve's behavior and goals is just as enlightening, on-point and timely.