Joe Lents hasn't made a payment on his $1.5 million mortgage since 2002.

[trooper2ls]

I have run into several banks playing games with paperwork lately myself. Sending registered mail no longer seems to be enough... they evade culpability by claiming that you sent them an envelope.. but claiming that the contents were not what you claim, etc.

Since a few have played that card.. I have updated the process by having all paperwork notarized, then attaching a certificate of mailing to each of the notarized docs, then obtaining postage and having the postmarked certificate of mailing roundated.. slightly overlapping on the paperwork... then recording the registered mail # on the certificate of mailing and making copies of all of that at the coin-op machine in the lobby of the USPS and then having the clerk seal the envelope and rounddate the seal.. and then making copies of the front and back of the envelope for extra insurance.

This time when the bank claimed they didn't receive anything from me... I was able to fax them the copies that I had made at the post office and a copy of the return card where they had signed for it and a short letter accusing them of evading culpability and that I would commence litigation against them for damages plus punitive damages that the court might permit under such rediculous circumstances.

I got a call from the repo company about an hour after I sent the fax to let me know that the bank had cancelled the repo order they had issued for my truck...

Still waiting on my zero balance statement and lien release.. but it is progress none the less.

My guess is that financial institution attorneys have sat around and figured out ways to evade and you have to make sure all "i's" are dotted and "t's" are crossed in process and procedures to get things done with them...

After all they are crooks right? Why should they play nice?

..J

[David Merrill]

...and when they send something to you, they do not lick the envelope seal - they just have a little piece of tape that could be easily opened, the contents replaced and then it arrives.

[trooper2ls]

Them crooks are sneeky little gremlins aren't they? I guess that is why whenever I have sent registered.. they tape the living @##$ out of it with the postal brown, "wet & glue" tape and then roundate it about 20 times up and down their seal.

My local postmaster and notary are very intrigued by what I'm doing and have not given me any trouble. When asked and I tell 'em it is fighting the banks... they are more than happy to help.

..J

[David Merrill]

DMM 601.4.3 Tape

"Cellophane and masking tape may not be used for closure or reinforcement of packages but may be used to augment adhesive closures on envelopes or to cover staples on bags."

Funny though, one federal judge seems to think the clerk of court is immune to postal regulations...

[trooper2ls]

Back to that 'ole "Construe and Construct" issue. They just make up the laws as they go to suit their purpose and put the burden on you to take it over their head. I can just imagine a US Supreme court case concerning the envelope sealing practices of a lower court.. now that would be funny.

..J

[courttroubles]

So my ??? are ....Should I file the subpoena first before a R4c? Who should receive these items? The original lender? The servicer now? The foreclosure attorney? Anyone else?

Even if I go this route how does it stop the POS from not doing it again to someone else? These attorneys, trustees, judges need to be held responsible for their lies to good people.

Thanks,

Kathy

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by courttroubles

So my ??? are ....Should I file the subpoena first before a R4c? Who should receive these items? The original lender? The servicer now? The foreclosure attorney? Anyone else?

Even if I go this route how does it stop the POS from not doing it again to someone else? These attorneys, trustees, judges need to be held responsible for their lies to good people.

Thanks,

Kathy

I have not gone back into details and am making a presumption about your accusation.

If you endorse private credit from the Fed, the Treasury holds a first lien on anything you purchase with those private credit FRNs - you bonded yourself collateral against the elasticity of elastic currency. You became FDR's Government bonds.

The second thing to understand is imbedded in my signature - quoting Shoonra's stand that the Magna Charta has been nullified by the Pope and that the government was justified by people "hoarding" their own gold in 1933. Shoonra is an attorner for the banking interests of the Crusaders and Crown Templars. It is revolting to the senses, I know, and this might prompt more disgusting homophobic insults - me revealing this again.

Delovio v. Boit is a wonderful example and like the above amendment in verbiage about names, one cannot find the full verbiage of Justice Story (1815) on the Internet (last I tried. I had to go to the Library and get on their subscription services).

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...vio_v_Boit.zip

And attached is a scan of the Library printout page, revealing how the Crusaders adopted the Laws of Oleron into the Black Book of the Admiralty to justify the pilfering of Jerusalem and the Holy Land with the rules of admiralty, forfeiture, jettison, flotsam etc...

The point I am making is that you must go into admiratly Restricted Appearance to confine all issues to terms of express contract, in order to back out and be a woman on the land. Then you are competent common law in the cognizance of the US. That is important to give that notice.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[trooper2ls]

Originally Posted by courttroubles

So my ??? are ....Should I file the subpoena first before a R4c? Who should receive these items? The original lender? The servicer now? The foreclosure attorney? Anyone else?

Even if I go this route how does it stop the POS from not doing it again to someone else? These attorneys, trustees, judges need to be held responsible for their lies to good people.

Thanks,

Kathy

I cannot give legal advice, but I can pass along information that you can use at your own risk. The court, attorneys and banks are basically a gang.. so you will never see accountability unless there is a world revolution and people start "eliminating" them.

I have attached a document that has a lot of valuable information that may help you figure out what to do. Unfortunately time is against you in this case because you didn't know that you were working with one of "them" (your atty)... untill it was too late. It is very late in the game to go through the due diligence process and have a well formulated plan of attack ready.

Best of luck.

..J

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by trooper2ls

I cannot give legal advice, but I can pass along information that you can use at your own risk. The court, attorneys and banks are basically a gang.. so you will never see accountability unless there is a world revolution and people start "eliminating" them.

I have attached a document that has a lot of valuable information that may help you figure out what to do. Unfortunately time is against you in this case because you didn't know that you were working with one of "them" (your atty)... untill it was too late. It is very late in the game to go through the due diligence process and have a well formulated plan of attack ready.

Best of luck.

..J

Institutionalized tyranny... Dan Meador.

Or more criminal syndicalism. Any way you want to look at it, the convolution is to make you feel like the criminal for abstaining - by redeeming lawful money. You are labelled unpatriotic for not supporting FDR's phony War on the Great Depression.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[trooper2ls]

Institutionalized tyranny.. I had forgotten about that one.

I have attached Dan's paper on that. Also another good one about when a parisite becomes a predator.

Enjoy

..J