Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Articles > Articles & News
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #111  
Old 04-07-2008, 11:13 AM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
To paraphrase John Hillerman's character in the movie "Blazing Saddles": That's some mighty fine authentic frontier gibberish there, Gabby.

To paraphrase a real life person (not a fiction)"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."
Mao Tse-Tung

Then according to that most infamous of all documents (at least here in Florida) the Florida Constitution Article 1 Section one "All political power is inherent in the people".

Joining the two quotations together, paints a mighty dismal picture for the corrupt judges and attorneys to view when and if this country ever does find itself in another 'civil war'.

The awesome thing about possible events like that, is that it can be spurred to initiation by just about any small event that the people don't like, or for that matter, just the stroke of a pen. Oh! Believe me! I am not looking forward to any such event, as there would be way too much bloodshed. But my likings are not always the determining factor in this society, nor am I advocating such a thing, just recognizing the potential for it to happen 'again'.

Jerry Carlos
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 04-07-2008, 12:02 PM
ezrhythm ezrhythm is online now
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 982
Send a message via AIM to ezrhythm Send a message via Yahoo to ezrhythm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigron-X
No sir, you did not answer the questions. The questions were re-stated for clarity for your benefit as you misconstrued them. The one who asked the questions is the one who is in the position to state whether the questions were properly addressed or not. You sir are not in that position. You accepted the challenge on your own accord, and you have failed to meet that challenge. So in your own words, "Pay up or shut up."

I concur!

AWAY FROM HERE WITH ANTI SUI JURIS POSTS!!!
__________________

Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.


Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.

I have more fun than peeeeple. -Bugs Bunny

To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.


Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 04-07-2008, 12:48 PM
WizordofOZ WizordofOZ is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
OK To further Substantiate UCC

Post Removed

Last edited by WizordofOZ : 04-07-2008 at 06:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 04-07-2008, 12:49 PM
WizordofOZ WizordofOZ is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
OK To further Substantiate UCC

Sorry double-post






___________________

Even the legislature has no power to deny a citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his property in the ordinary course of business or pleasure, though this right may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience. – Chicago Motor Coach v Chicago 169 NE 22

Last edited by WizordofOZ : 04-07-2008 at 12:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 04-07-2008, 12:54 PM
KarenM KarenM is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizordofOZ
I find it funny that Mr. Lawdog Would drop me with a gibberish line Mr. King gibberish, See not everyone around here is un-educated; everyone in my family has been, is, or was; a lawyer, para-legal, or other type of federal worker. So to further entrigue, entertain, and exasperate your gibberish quote.

...

Except for one apple which clearly fell quite far from the tree.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 04-07-2008, 02:03 PM
Lawdog Lawdog is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 578
thanks

Not to mention that anyone who thinks all lawyers and paralegals are "federal workers" doesn't know his a** from a hole in the ground....

But I appreciate your putting that at the beginning of your spiel, Gabby. It let me know that everything that followed was yet more meaningless gibberish, so there was no need to read it other than most casually..
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 04-07-2008, 03:05 PM
Tigron-X's Avatar
Tigron-X Tigron-X is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 69
Send a message via AIM to Tigron-X
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
No one has competently answered lawdog yet. I wish you would pay up more than your own opinion.

First off, you're brining up 2 different issues or maybe more. I am addressing this one here. I'll gladly go and address those other issues in the same manner, i.e. as an impartial referee. Just let me know which ones you're referring to, or you can go do it.

Secondly, telling someone they haven't addressed the questions accordingly is not opinion. It's based off the statements of the person who posed the questions to begin with. Dorkenbutt is in the right to do so, not Lawdog.

It's like me going to you and asking, "What is the color of the sky?" And you reply, "The color of the sky on Venus is orange." However, I was refering to Earth. So was my question answered? No it wasn't. So let's all come back down to Earth and resolve the confusion.

As it stands, Lawdog hasn't answered the questions accordingly when he accepted the challenge to do so. Failure to do so will constitute as proof that the man ( Lawdog) is a fraud, a con artist, and without merit.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 04-07-2008, 05:09 PM
KarenM KarenM is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
Well every one in my family composes two judges, one bankruptcy trusty, and four other lawyers, plus two more lawyer in-laws... Oh and what you do know... I have more wins to show then all the rest of suijuris added together and Judges flat out tell me they respect my motions.

I have never been issued a contempt even for calling the judge a piece of **** to his face in open court.

You just keep doing your dumb crap and getting rejected. I will keep providing motions to court to rule upon and getting results I want. You keep talking about how the system is unfair because your crack-headed **** don't fly.

Codee, is that you again?

Sounds like you, down to the exact same spelling and grammatical errors.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 04-07-2008, 05:36 PM
Tigron-X's Avatar
Tigron-X Tigron-X is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 69
Send a message via AIM to Tigron-X
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
Why do you sit there and ask lawdog questions and expect him to answer.

I didn't ask him any questions. You should get your facts straight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
Post your own research in contradiction to what Lawdog posts or don't. Don't pull and MRG and think that your stupid questions going unanswered means you have some sort of knowledge. Just post a win that you have from an adversarial setting in which you used your crappy theory and this can all be put to rest.

I have countless dismissals and I am sure Lawdog has actually been to court and won a few cases.

You sit on the internet with no research, and then blast Lawdog for providing credible citations. YOU are the one with nothing at all to show. Can you answer your own questions? If so stop posing them to Lawdog.

You are the one asking questions proving you do not know.

Then you go straight from question asking to accusations with no proof of your own.

Seems mighty stupid to me.


You're rambaling aimlessly as your words do not address the content at hand. Get your facts straight and then address me accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 04-07-2008, 06:09 PM
WizordofOZ WizordofOZ is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
This is good

Well thanks, I was just messing with you guys, and it was great. So I wish to say good day!
oh, I don't have to win cases because I don't have to go to any, I don't need to be enjoining in the plot, so I'll leave my comments where they lay.

P.S. The apple fell quite far from the tree, this tree I speak of "The Tree of Knowledge." That has been passed down generations through family influence and public schooling, the knowledge that's been bestowed into you since birth. You are Taught everything by who, what, and where? I need no answer to this question, I already know. As do you, and everyone else. But it's a given, if you spend the time to get the information firsthand, and dig into the truth, there is a whole different story. I need no proof I have plenty of it already in our history and everything else, that being actual historic records and documents, and whatever else I need. so I am not worried about any of that crap, I know it and you can't tell me otherwise. Thanks for the comment though it inspired me.

I'll leave you all be and say I'm sorry for interrupting, I just saw it and wanted to comment. I won't post any more
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commercial Affidavit kran sanis Success Stories 6 03-02-2007 09:38 PM
Affidavit of Truth Freedomless Court 38 04-13-2006 07:56 PM
Commercial Affidavit harps Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 3 03-07-2006 01:39 PM
Commercial Affidavit harps Office of Information Retrieval 1 02-16-2006 07:49 PM

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer