I also have another tidbit to throw into the fray:
My name is copyrighted.
I have debated putting the credit reporting agencies on notice not to use my copy righted name.
If I put them on notice, I wonder what the ramifications will be? Will ALL of my credit history go up in smoke? The good and the bad?
I wonder.
The "I've copyrighted my name, and you have to pay me every time you use it" argument has a zero percent success rate.
Use it in court, and the judge will immediately know you're a crank, or have been taking the advice of cranks, at the very least.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
For about 350 years the word "dollar" was associated with silver coins. In 1873 silver was replaced with gold backing. Sixty years later the gold was removed from general redemption and the people were issued "credit."
1933 marked the taking of the people's credit by the government with subsequent assignment of the credit to the banks when the banks were licensed to hypothecate the people's credit into medium of exchange.
Vladimir Nuri: FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING AS ECONOMIC PARASITISM
Abstract: This paper looks at the history of money and its modern form from a scientific and mathematical point of view. The approach here is to emphasize simplicity. A straightforward model and algebraic formula for a large economy analogous to the ideal gas law of thermodynamics is proposed. It may be something like a new "F=ma" rule of the emerging econophysics field. Some implications of the equation are outlined, derived, and proved. The phenomena of counterfeiting, inflation and deflation are analyzed for interrelations. Analogies of the economy to an ecosystem or energy system are advanced. The fundamental legitimacy of "expansion of the money supply" in particular is re-examined and challenged. From the hypotheses a major (admittedly radical) conclusion is that the modern international "fractional reserve banking system" is actually equivalent to "legalized economic parasitism by private bankers." This is the case because, contrary to conventional wisdom, the proceeds of inflation are not actually spendable by the state. Also possible are forms of "economic warfare" based on the principles. Alternative systems are proposed to remediate this catastrophic flaw.
Don't take mrg personally. That seems to be his usual argument. Something reminiscent of the old radio show about the adventures of Baron Munchausen.
It's worth keeping in mind (1) Dave the Jailbird (and others) only show bits of arguments from cases without telling us the judge's decision or how to get it -- strong evidence by itself that the decision was against them, and (2) MRG has yet to back up his own claims with any precedents, and he seems incapable (I don't know if it's pure laziness or combined with dementia) of looking up precedents that I have cited; he doesn't bother looking them up so he acts as if I haven't cited them.
Actually, Shoonra, I can't offhand remember mrg (aka mindlessly repeating gibberish) making any real legal arguments as such. Mainly he engages in his pathological hatred and/or fear of lawyers, much as some people have a pathological hatred and/or fear of Jews, blacks, Freemasons, etc.
The depth of his delusions is apparent when you observe that he still clings to the long-discredited notion that the term "bar" as applied to lawyers is actually "BAR," an acronym for "British Accredited Registry" or something along those lines. Although I have posted a link to the attorney's oath for my state, which clearly shows that there is nothing in the oath indicating fealty to the English crown, or indeed any entities other than the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Georgia, he persists in his delusion that lawyers are somehow agents of the British government.
I guess when you've drunk enough of the Kool-Aid, old delusions die hard.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
We suitors are too ugly to come out right in photographs - see attached assize.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIntelCritic
I also have another tidbit to throw into the fray:
My name is copyrighted.
I have debated putting the credit reporting agencies on notice not to use my copy righted name.
If I put them on notice, I wonder what the ramifications will be? Will ALL of my credit history go up in smoke? The good and the bad?
I wonder.
You cannot bill them for using a legal or full name that you gave them. There is confusion about your name.
The attorners in black robes will not comment on breaching the close - going outside the artificial realm. The two cases sanitized in the DoJ motion attached are people who never contacted me - they just proceeded in their legal or full names without understanding the Strawman conditioning you have been victimized by yourself. The names of the cases were obviously family nomens like Deitemeyer or Saunderman etc...
Since the magistrates needed not admit to any false branding, they must have jumped on the opportunity to slur otherwise fine process. But here is what the Motion was really about; a contract offer to pretty please Suitor allow the US to come to the private Fed corporate agent's rescue? Attached Page 4.* The Suitor wisely Refused for Cause timely.
I am not spending much time explaining all this again but the whole common law applied in any court is about the authority to instruct the clerk. (attached clerk instruction) An assize Instructed the removal of Bruce Clyde's matter and of course included no filing fee - being the superior court. So the justices interpreted that as a motion to proceed as a pauper - In Forma Pauperis. - Which is to say the entire opinion is only the last sentence of this one they gave...
The Lawdog jackal mentality got the better of them though... And I appreciate Mrg's photojournalism of attorneys. It is just that more explanation about the mechanics is required. This suitor just called and is sending me a nice gratuity for some work on this topic.
Quote:
Hello David,
Do you have a template for a clerk instruction letter to remove a case from the state- -county superior court to the district court ? Does it eliminate the case and what the court / county did ?
Thanks...
P.S. Whoops almost forgot; I just spent over 2 hours talking with a friend that knew Jerome Daly. Evidently he lived out his last years here in California.
by: True Name: Expressly Reserving All Rights and Liberties.
"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God." - Thomas Jefferson
And all the referrals from Shoonra and Lawdog, while I appreciate them are too much overhead compared to jealous friends and family of extant suitors. But you can still PM me and I will consider speaking with you about remedy. Most of the material is here if you want to click my Bio and go through a lot of my posts.
Thanks again Shoonra! And Lawdog; since you are on my IgnoreList let me just say that I agree with Mrg - you are a jackal.
Regards,
David Merrill.
* The Fed is a private corporation and the DoJ is hoping the Suitor will allow the US to come to the IRS agent's rescue:
Quote:
“one-half of its capital stock . . .” of the respondents/Libelants Principal, the Fund and Bank. 28 USC §1349; The government by becoming a corporator, (See 28 USC §3002(15(A)(B)(C), 22 USCA 286(e)) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States v. Planters Bank of Georgia, 5 L.Ed. (Wheat) 244; U.S. v. Butt, 309 U.S. 242). The REAL PARTY OF INTEREST is not the de jure “United States of America” or “State”, but “The Bank” and “The Fund”. (22 USCA 286, et. seq.). The acts committed under fraud, force and seizure are many times done under “Letters of Marque and Reprisal” i.e., “recapture.” (See 31 USCA §5323). Such principles as “Fraud and Justice never dwell together, Wingate’s Maxims 680, and “A right of action cannot arise out of fraud.” Brown’s Maxims 297, 729.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).
And all the referrals from Shoonra and Lawdog, while I appreciate them are too much overhead compared to jealous friends and family of extant suitors.
Exposing his fraudulent and/or delusional claims is giving him referrals? If that isn't proof if DiM's insanity, I don't know what is.
I wouldn't refer my worst enemy to DiM, any more than I would refer someone to Dr. Jack Kevorkian for medical advice.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
Exposing his fraudulent and/or delusional claims is giving him referrals? If that isn't proof if DiM's insanity, I don't know what is.
I wouldn't refer my worst enemy to DiM, any more than I would refer someone to Dr. Jack Kevorkian for medical advice.
Much to your dismay, there are many people who see the sham that you are distributing to the many viewers of this forum. Those people, realizing the difference between truth and falsehood, choose to elect the preference of truth. Therefore, your continued attacks on people who are presenting the truth, only encourages those people to seek out the counsel of those providing 'truth'. Subsequently, you are in effect making referrals to DiM (David Merrill) without even being conscious of the acts you are committing. I would also like to thank you for making those referrals, as the more people there are that are reading the truth, the less there are that are reading falsehood and mis-representations.
Much to your dismay, there are many people who see the sham that you are distributing to the many viewers of this forum. Those people, realizing the difference between truth and falsehood, choose to elect the preference of truth. Therefore, your continued attacks on people who are presenting the truth, only encourages those people to seek out the counsel of those providing 'truth'. Subsequently, you are in effect making referrals to DiM (David Merrill) without even being conscious of the acts you are committing. I would also like to thank you for making those referrals, as the more people there are that are reading the truth, the less there are that are reading falsehood and mis-representations.
Have a nice day.
Jerry Carlos
Whatever you say, boy.
The TRUTH, which is easily verifiable in the public record, is that DiM has spent time in jail, including at least one occasion when he was convicted by a jury of his peers. On another occasion, a federal judge threw out a lawsuit he filed exactly one day after he filed it with the memorable comment that it was a "rambling, nonsensical, incoherent blotch on this court's docket."
Have I won all my cases? Of course not, no lawyer wins them all. But has a judge ever called me nuts, as Judge Nottingham did when he tossed DiM's suit? No.
You follow DiM's theories at your severe peril. I just hope you don't end up serving time like he did.
Good luck, son. Something tells me you're going to need it.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
I hear what you're saying but my name is REALLY copyrighted.
Perhaps you would provide us with a copy of the Copyright Office registration?? Since a copyrighted text has to show a copyright notice from its first public appearance, perhaps you'd also show us your Birth Certificate with the copyright notice? What did they call you all through school (apart from some possibilities that I can imagine)??
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIntelCritic
The entities I have put on notice haver NEVER contacted me again after they received my notice.
You mean, they didn't waste time and postage arguing with a nutcase? What are the chances?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIntelCritic
My associates have done the same thing to judges and lawyers and all of them have backed down.
And just last week I posted a news item about one of the Montana Freemen who tried this stunt and gets to be known by a number for about a dozen more years.....
I hear what you're saying but my name is REALLY copyrighted.
The entities I have put on notice haver NEVER contacted me again after they received my notice.
My associates have done the same thing to judges and lawyers and all of them have backed down.
Copyrighting the name, whether it be 'common law' or any other variety, is only part of the solution of un-wanted persons attempting to contact you.
Attached is proof of what happens when un-solicited mail arrives at an address that is incorrect according to registered information within the USPS databases. Notice the sticker affixed to envelope (placed there by the USPS). It now becomes my duty to r4c this communication and if the sender is a known 'good guy', then I need to inform that sender of the correct address.
