so this is what is meant by "quatlooser"...

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?t=2420

this thread has been monitored from "the other side". I had no idea suijuris was that interesting to anyone else.

Turns out LAWDOG plays an a$$hole on the internet and is one in real life, too.

[KarenM]

Sui Juris is a constant source of amusement to people with an IQ greater than that of a carrot.

Some topics, such as the bogus "need good advice from a professional accredited attorney" are more amusing than others for the simple reason that they porofess to request advice, but cast the request in a light that will force any answers to lead to the author's predetermined conclusions.

If the Farmer actually wanted advice, he would have clearly stated the facts of the case, instead of changing the rules each time he posted a follow-up.

Also, he wouldn't have appended his misunderstanding of the laws, rules, and procedures of income tax assessment, lien establishment, and tax court rules as if they were factual.

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

Originally Posted by KarenM

If the Farmer actually wanted advice, he would have clearly stated the facts of the case, instead of changing the rules each time he posted a follow-up.

That thread

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/taxati...-attorney.html

is hereby declared a success. I got lots of useful advice despite the best efforts of "other sympathies".

Every point of silence are defaults which I take as proven until shown otherwise- so there must have been a few things generally right, for such a one as I, seeking remedy.

And the sympathies of the lawyer-class shone bright- but we already knew that.

SHOONRA told me to "k.i.s.s."- which is probably the best point made. He/She motivated me to remember the correct 1st answer to accusations of any sort- a demurrer.

ECCLESIASTES showed me the importance of 'cost' vs 'value'.

MERTENSV16 fine-tuned my thinking on capital gains and basis calculations, and pointed out that even the IRC recognizes losses and damage.

KARENM reminded me to pay attention to the flow of the argument- dont let others sidetrack you with any 'twists' and 'spin'.

and as for the LAWDOG, well ...he showed the color of his fur real good.

Some topics, such as the bogus "need good advice from a professional accredited attorney" are more amusing than others for the simple reason that they porofess to request advice, but cast the request in a light that will force any answers to lead to the author's predetermined conclusions.

I'm glad you liked it. Isn't it fun when attorneys get the BAR treatment?

[indio007]

I'm still waiting for someone to take me up on my challenge.

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/134916-post80.html

[Lawdog]

Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?t=2420

this thread has been monitored from "the other side". I had no idea suijuris was that interesting to anyone else.

Turns out LAWDOG plays an a$$hole on the internet and is one in real life, too.

You conveniently omitted this part of my post over at quatloos:

I spend a lot of my free time in a valiant (not to mention uncompensated) attempt to keep folks at Sui (the ones who are not too far gone, at least) from drinking the Kool-Aid. Right now I'm trying to convince folks that citing the long-overturned "Credit River" case is NOT going to help them avoid their house being foreclosed on. I have enough compassion for my fellow man that I don't like to see folks turned out on the street. In my judgment, my time is better spent posting on threads like this than playing farmer giles' little bulls**t game.

If I were an *******, I wouldn't care about someone I never met losing their house. I'd just say, "Fine, let them cite an overturned case that has no precedential value. Serves 'em right." But I actually care enough that I want someone who is facing foreclosure to have a fighting chance. Citing garbage like "Credit River" in a foreclosure is like going to a gunfight armed only with a water pistol.

You want to call me an *******, fine. But the facts don't bear that out.

[sonny]

Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham

That thread

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/taxati...-attorney.html

is hereby declared a success. I got lots of useful advice despite the best efforts of "other sympathies".

Every point of silence are defaults which I take as proven until shown otherwise- so there must have been a few things generally right, for such a one as I, seeking remedy.

And the sympathies of the lawyer-class shone bright- but we already knew that.

SHOONRA told me to "k.i.s.s."- which is probably the best point made. He/She motivated me to remember the correct 1st answer to accusations of any sort- a demurrer.

ECCLESIASTES showed me the importance of 'cost' vs 'value'.

MERTENSV16 fine-tuned my thinking on capital gains and basis calculations, and pointed out that even the IRC recognizes losses and damage.

KARENM reminded me to pay attention to the flow of the argument- dont let others sidetrack you with any 'twists' and 'spin'.

and as for the LAWDOG, well ...he showed the color of his fur real good.



I'm glad you liked it. Isn't it fun when attorneys get the BAR treatment?

i am assuming you are being foreclosed on and if true this must be done. by the rules of conduct of an attorney,in my state, they must have a signed agreement with their client. i can not off hand quote case history,besides credit river which is sealed, they must have in their possesion the original prommisory note. a copy will not work. if this case is new and you can supeona ask for their contract,which you must state the rule number, with their client and produce in court the original prommisory note which they can not do and then request the court to hold them in contempt, if the court refuses demand a dismissal. hopefully someone else can quote case law which will be benefical for your evidence