Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Articles > Articles & News
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-03-2006, 07:41 PM
RickA's Avatar
RickA RickA is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 491
Quote:
Everything I write is Internet Yarn. That anecdote truly happened. What I mean by Yarn is that I have nothing to lose whether you believe it or not.

Ok. Just had a thought and figured I'd run with it.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-08-2006, 11:45 AM
Lawyerdude Lawyerdude is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 69
Send a message via Yahoo to Lawyerdude
It is the Bar. Not the BAR. This article is lunacy!

The word Bar is not an acronym. BAR - British Accreditation Regency is just so much hooey. Whoever wrote this drivel hasn't a clue. The article is comletely devoid of references or substantiation. Any person of education would know,of course, that this article is untrue. However, a person can make a good living in this movement by selling paper to the stupid.
I am Lawyerduded. Heed my words! This book is bogus, dude!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-08-2006, 04:43 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/p...wprofile&u=486
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-08-2006, 05:12 PM
Admin's Avatar
Admin Admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
Lawyerdude, if you had actually read our comments to this article rather than respond with an emotional outburst, you would have seen that we have debated the legitimacy of the facts in the article. You could have contributed to this debate in a positive way and enlightened us all instead of ignoring all the warnings our mods gave you and continued with the viloation of the terms of this site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawyerdude
The word Bar is not an acronym. BAR - British Accreditation Regency is just so much hooey. Whoever wrote this drivel hasn't a clue. The article is comletely devoid of references or substantiation. Any person of education would know,of course, that this article is untrue. However, a person can make a good living in this movement by selling paper to the stupid.
I am Lawyerduded. Heed my words! This book is bogus, dude!
__________________
Sui Juris Webmaster
"The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall."

THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE IN ANY CAPACITY WHATSOEVER

Last edited by Admin : 04-08-2006 at 05:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-08-2006, 05:24 PM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawyerdude
The word Bar is not an acronym.
I am Lawyerduded. Heed my words!

Maybe the person whose post you responded to used the name BAR for Bar, the same way the IRS (an acronym) uses JOHN DOE for John Doe.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-25-2006, 01:22 PM
Gary Okupant Gary Okupant is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 25
Send a message via ICQ to Gary Okupant Send a message via AIM to Gary Okupant Send a message via Yahoo to Gary Okupant
Exclamation Bar Association Monoply; Therefore by FTC Rules Illegal

The BAR; doesn't have to speak? Anyone show me in "Law", thats the constitution that Lawyers/Counselors "Speak". They donot! You speak, I speak; with "counsel". "I, you, we" speak and confront and speak. I have as of yet; seen NO ruling in which the "Bar in the lawyer" speaks! As the monoply speaks; and the Court is established by Statue, Constitution; and the Court writes the "Administrative Law"; for implementation of the "Law". and practice thereof; the BAR is paid by taxpayers.
The Taxpayer; therefore is entitled to taxpayer funded coverage; as the taxpayer; gave voice to the Constitution to implement the administration "of" the Constitution.

I had a DEFENSE LAWYER; resign on me; and the court approved! The next week when I arrived in court; with NO counsel; the same lawyer who was allowed to leave and NOT represent me; was assigned by the same JUDGE to provide counsel to "me". Go figure. As a Pro Se; "I", voice at any time concern for process and sovereign rights inalienable to me by the Constitution. Now administrative law may not change by adding too or removing the wording and meaning of "MY" Constitution. The Ohio Constitution again also stipulates "Counsel"; as "I" confront.

There is NO requirement for a lawyer! Only an implied threat that "one" representing onesself; may only lose.

I await; the evidence that "I" may not succeed without proper legal representation.

Am "I" missing something here?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-25-2006, 04:20 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,475
The semicolon is supposed to be the "youngest" punctuation mark still in continuous use, going back only about four centuries. You obviously are trying to make up for lost time by peppering it everywhere, including places where it doesn't make sense.

"The bar" is an expression describing the whole legal profession, just as "the ebnch" describes the whole judiciary. Most lawyers in the US are not members of the American Bar Association, and some are not even members of their own state bar organizations.

For at least 300 years, the legal profession has been regarded as one of "learned professions" - along with medicine and the clergy. The Constitutional mention of "assistance of counsel" has always been interpreted to mean a professional lawyer, even at a time when most lawyers entered the profession through apprenticeships rather than through law schools.

I can't say more because I cannot figure out much of your message.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-25-2006, 05:39 PM
fulltitle's Avatar
fulltitle fulltitle is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: kingdom of heaven
Posts: 1,504
Without Prejudice
'Bar' means brother in a well-known tongue.
__________________
All rights reserved. No Liability Assumed. No Value Assured. Without Recourse. Private. Not for hire.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Text of public law 73-10 kgod999 UCC 87 02-11-2008 08:30 AM
Strategic Independence for American Citizens rushpat Citizenship & Jurisdiction 2 11-05-2006 03:20 AM
PRINCIPLES IN BANKING by the American Bankers Association 6th Ed. dashboy Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 5 07-28-2006 08:03 AM
The American Bar Association - Illegal Freedomless Court 20 12-22-2005 10:51 AM

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer