Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Articles > Articles & News
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2006, 01:46 PM
chumdinger
 
Posts: n/a
Former Oregon Prosecutor Claims Americans Need To Fight Judicial Corruption

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/29-Apr-2006.html


Former Oregon Prosecutor Claims Americans Need To Fight Judicial Corruption Or Freedom Will Turn Into Slavery


Roger Weidner, a former attorney disbarred in 1997 for seeking the truth, has been jailed more than 19 times and illegally placed in a mental institution for wanting to expose judicial corruption.
29 Apr 2006

By Greg Szymanski



Roger Weidner, a former Oregon state prosecutor, claims America is making a steady transition from freedom to slavery, saying fighting judicial corruption is one way to return to a Constitutional form of government before it's too late.



And for more than 20 years, Weidner, 67, disbarred in 1997 from the practice of law in Oregon for trying to fight the corrupt system, has been asking one important question every single blacked-robed jurist has failed to answer:



"Your honor, is this a court of due process as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution!"



Almost like clockwork, Weidner says each judge refuses to answer, knowing the leading question opens up a judicial can of worms and court-guarded secret since the system, through legal technicalities, has become a biased administrative arm of the government set up to take away a citizen's right not protect them.



"The constitutional rights, guaranteed to the citizen by the sworn pledge of our publicly elected magistrates, have been shamelessly and treacherously stripped from the citizens of this great land by an arrogant and abusive judiciary," said Weidner this week on Greg Szymanski's popular radio show, The Investigative Journal.



"This judiciary has made our courts "safe havens" for thieves and a house of horrors for innocent citizens seeking to recover what has been wrongfully taken from them."



A former member of the 101st Airborne Division before graduating from Lewis and Clarke Law School, Weidner's fight against corruption began 18 years ago after he struggled to return the now-valued $100 million Kettleberg estate to its rightful beneficiary after it had been wrongly seized by an unscrupulous but well-connected attorney.



And for trying to get justice for his client, Weidner was repeatedly arrested, imprisoned, confined to an insane asylum, and finally disbarred. His story, as told to H. Hammond in a book called "The Weidner Method," is a real life testament to how the judiciary has usurped the law while replacing constitutional guarantees with a system in which judges rule by decree.



After fighting judicial corruption on every level in the 18 years since his "eyes were opened" in the Kettleberg case, Weidner has been jailed more than 19 times, including 70 days in a psychiatric institution for simply speaking out in courtrooms demanding judicial accountability.



"My overall goal is to restore Constitutional government to the people of Oregon and the people of the United States," said Weidner. "It's really very simple if people want to take back their country, they have to take back their court houses and this means descending on these corrupt judges by in a group revolt."

Speaking from the heart and trying to emphasize there is no hope of taking back America if there exists no place to obtain a redress of grievances, he added:



"It is my hope that Americans in every county in the country will converge upon their courthouses and use The Weidner Method to fight any kind of case. Throughout my 20 years of research about government corruption, The Weidner Method is the first solution I have ever encountered. If nothing else, it will expose duplicity and make the entire community aware of it, a necessary first step.



"The government should be restructured from the bottom up in cells of 10 families as described in the writings of Kelly Hoskins, author of the Hoskins Report. Senators should again be elected by state legislatures, illegal aliens should be incarcerated, deported and the borders sealed, no more foreign aid, fractional reserve banking should be outlawed, debtfree money should be issued by the Congress, solar technology, which was running factories 100 years ago, should be unsuppressed, natural healing should be unsuppressed, the truth should be unsuppressed, return of the media to the private sector-all of these and countless other issues can be addressed in the courtroom using The Weidner Method.



"According to history, when a nation is in transition from one form of government to a different type of government, as we are now making the transition from freedom to enslavement, there is a point in the struggle, a section of time, during which it could go either way. I believe we are presently teetering on that brink."



The method he has used for more than 20 years to help stop judicial corruption is outlined in his book and the major steps to follow, according to Weidner, are as follows:



Ask for permission to video the proceedings.



Use the Freedom Of Information Act to get your records. Anything with your name or your child's name on it belongs to you. (Gaston)



Bring crowds into the courtroom, the bigger the better.



Prep the crowd out in the corridor both to intimidate the guards and to focus the crowd's attention. Tell your supporters that when the judge tries to shut you down they should all say together, "Let him speak! Let him speak!" Remind everyone to pay attention in the courtroom. When they pay attention the guards back off. When they are distracted the guards move in.



Speak to the guards and police officers standing around. "Your guards know what's going on. These judges, attorneys and state agents are kidnapping these children, rigging elections." whatever your case is about.



Do not stand up for the judge if you know he is corrupt. Remain seated when he enters if you want to show that you know he is corrupt. Or, remain standing until he enters if you want to avoid making a show of respect.



Bring binoculars, opera glasses or telescopes into the courtroom to aim at the officers of the court for closer scrutiny, if possible. It intimidates them. (Editor)



Mentally discipline yourself not to think or react emotionally.



Make the record in the courtroom.



Stand up together as a group when the guards enter in a threatening manner. If the guards are threatening get their names.



Even if you lose, you win, because you are exposing the corruption. Exposure of their corruption and the rising up of the people is the only thing they fear.



Get your tapes of the proceedings from the clerk right away before you leave the courtroom so they won't be edited. (Gaston)



The worse that it is in the courtroom the better that it is because the story goes into the paper and people find out how horrible it was.



Every time a judge dismisses a case and you appeal it, file compulsory process into the Supreme Court and add his name to your racketeering complaint.



Publish the stories in the newspaper and in any other form of media possible.



Spread those papers around to every state office, every judge, attorney and govt. employee and the surrounding community to frighten the public officials and heighten public awareness. Don't forget the police and the courthouse guards.



Issue as many subpoenas as possible as often as possible. It makes them nervous.



Confront and loudly point out the crooks wherever and whenever you see them.



Do not hire an attorney. Be your own lawyer.



Don't give up. Be prepared for a long struggle. Once you begin you must keep the pressure on.



In brief, file a complaint, put it in the newspaper, come into court and make the record, prepare an affidavit, wait the 30 days, then come into the court and move for Summary Judgment.



Weidner is best known for helping Will and Pamela Gaston in their struggle to bring justice to Melissa Gaston, daughter of Will Gaston, who has been repeatedly abused by SOSCF officials, and others involved with her involuntary incarceration in the Oregon foster care system and adoption program.



"I am at war with this corruption", said Weidner. "As a lawyer and historian I am acutely aware that under our constitutional form of government the citizens are the sovereign political authority in this state and country.



"According to the Oregon Constitution and the U.S. Constitution before anything of value can be taken, by the courts in this state and county, from a sovereign citizen that citizen must be afforded "equal protection of law" and "due process of law." Due process being a fair hearing with an impartial judge."



Explaining the importance of following the impartial guidelinbes of the U.S. Constitution, he added:



"All individuals working for the government whether federal, state, or local, are public employees. If these employees are elected or given discretionary authority they are "public officials" who by law must take an oath of office to uphold and defend the state and federal constitution rights of the citizens of Oregon and the United States. Article 1 Sec. 1 of the Oregon Constitution provides: "We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper."



"Article 1 Sec. 10 of the Oregon Constitution provides: "No court shall be secret, but justice shall be administered, openly and without purchase, completely and without delay, and every man shall have remedy by due course of law for injury done him in his person, property or reputation." The 5th Amendment to the US Constitution provides: "No person shall�be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law�" The l4th Amendment to the US Constitution provides: "�No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law: nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."



For more informative articles, go to www.arcticbeacon.com

Greg Szymanski Greg also has his own daily show on the Republic Broadcast Network. Go to www.rbnlive.com Greg Szymanski is an independent investigative journalist and his articles can been seen at www.LewisNews.com. He also writes for American Free Press and has his own site www.arcticbeacon.com

Listen to my Radio Broadcast live Monday night at 8pm Pacific time on LewisNews, returning Jan. 1 2006 Radio http://webs.lewisnews.com/radio/index.htm. Greg is also regular on Rense.com the first Thursday of every month at 9-10 pm pacific time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2006, 03:01 PM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
Oregon is the pits !!!

Will and Pam Gaston (God rest her soul) recused 44 of 47 judges in Oregon !

See their website A Voice for Children .

They have a killer handbook out called "Sui Juris" for $17.. It's a must have !

For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2006, 06:27 PM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,020
I have to agree that the courts and due process of law are key to what kind of future we are heading into.

Being incarcerated in a mental institution simply for asking "judges:" "Your honor, is this a court of due process as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution," is a pretty telling commentary.

I do not see much that can be done until We The People have free access to lawful "judicial Power."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2006, 06:36 PM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
Quote:
I do not see much that can be done until We The People have free access to lawful "judicial Power.

But mrg... we already do !!

Give me 60 days... I'm going to be putting my money where my mouth is... I'll let you know what happens...

For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2006, 01:13 AM
Fight.The.Corrupt
 
Posts: n/a
I am new here, but I might suggest that your technique is smothered and thus must be revised.

My techniques failed also and thus my fight to get judges in jail is on the lower part of a large American mountain, but there are new ways including trying to get the word out in color and sound. See two and more of my efforts (the others will be thumbnailes or can be reached by clicking on the poster's profile) at:

"FBI, DoJ and Bush fail to pretend to do job"

found at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCYBk4LOLU8

or

"Honest Non-Mute Lawyers Are Few--Coward Slaves Are The Rest"

found at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUQpesAy3jw

Any comments are welcome and any discussion on how to get the exposure necessary to get the FBI bothered enough to pretend a pretense of an investigation, and preferably to actually believe that one is required to protect America from judicial thieves is of course why I posted here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2006, 05:48 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
I enjoy that kind of idealism. Being an attorney, or even pro se subjects one to the rulings and opinions of the attorney in the black robe so don't take the whole committment (to an institution) thing too seriously. Without arraignment I have had prosecutors try that twice and the man legislating from the bench refused to write that into law. The judge simply makes a quick evaluation himself (since he legislates from the bench like Congress I suppose in his demi-god way he can also substutute for a psychiatrist), "The defendant is perfectly sane so that motion is denied. A psychiatric evaluation will not be happening Mr. Prosecutor."

It caused me to ponder, Why am I the only guy around without a DOB, SSN, Bank Account, Government Issued ID card etc? I tried The Pikes Peak Mental Health Center and the first time they accepted my $14 fee. They analyzed me for a bit and determined that I was not mentally ill. The peculiar thing is that they insisted on giving me back my $14, the exact bills I tendered them, and tried to keep my receipt and paperwork* - like the event never happened. That sounds a little neurotic if you ask me.

The second time they simply refused to allow me in. But they certainly were quick to acknowledge that the first visit never happened. Maybe I am just too crazy for psychiatrists to look at? My friends in the mental health industry do not feel that way.


Regards,

David Merrill.


* I made sure to mark the contract agreement, "No pharmaceuticals or unwarranted physical restraint."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2006, 01:46 PM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akira
But mrg... we already do !!

Give me 60 days... I'm going to be putting my money where my mouth is... I'll let you know what happens...

For HIS Glory,
Akira

I mostly was talking about filing fees.

I have no money to put where my mouth is.

When the judge told me (in those words) he was going to do what he wanted regardless of the law, and he sneered, "you can appeal it if you do not like it," I could not buy my way into the court of appeal, and they will not let you in until you give them FRN's, which I did not have because the judge gave them to his buddy opposing me.

I cannot "afford" to use the courts the way I would like to, and they want to make you pay a fee to "defend" yourself, and any "appeal" will not be heard unless one "buys" the permission to file.

I do not know what you will doing, but my sincere prayers will be with you, with your permission.

Last edited by mrg : 05-23-2006 at 01:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Privatizing your car rushpat Travel 102 05-16-2006 12:30 PM
Some good court cases leatherlips Court 4 04-02-2006 07:00 PM
Case decions are not law, they're based on law weishaupt1776 Court 7 01-26-2006 09:34 PM
Deep Judicial Corruption - ADVICE NEEDED its2die4 Court 31 06-03-2005 06:50 AM
Read to find Oregon Sui Juris case at work...^i^ Birdman^i^ Misc. Discussion 1 02-19-2004 07:43 PM

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer