Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Articles > Articles & News
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2006, 01:40 AM
Admin's Avatar
Admin Admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 302
The Government Hoax by Marc Stevens

The government hoax is probably the oldest, most pervasive and stubborn of hoaxes. Itís the belief in non-existent "states" and "nations" and that "government" is both legitimate and necessary. In the geographic area of the North American continent commonly referred to as the "United States," itís claimed only "government" can provide the service of protecting "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." This is nonsense if only for the reason "government" has no duty to protect anyone and their property.

Another reason is: no service or product should be provided at the barrel of a gun. Itís that simple. There are no exceptions unless one believes people have no rights. If one believes people have no rights then "government" is not "necessary" to "protect" what doesnít exist. If you believe people have rights, then you donít "protect" them without their freely given consent. Also, protection is not submission to the violent unaccountable control of another nor is violent domination a legitimate method of doing business. Would you hire people who donít acknowledge you have property, to protect your property? I wouldn't:

"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and that use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State." Senate Resolution #62, April 1933.

What exactly is "government?" Have you ever seen a "government?" While there are varying degrees, "government" is one man violently controlling the life and property of another man. In some places this violent control is "decreed" to be for the latterís "own good" and "protection" and hailed as the "best system in the world." Because itís based on violence, there are no "states" or "nations," "states" being "voluntary associations." You may recognize that violent control over a manís life and property is what we like to callÖ slavery. Slavery is a form of "government," and in most cases, if not all, synonymous with "government." Govern means control, not protect. Have you ever noticed the word "protect" is mysteriously not included in any definitions of govern?

"govern. To direct and control; to regulate; to influence; to restrain; to manage. State v Ream, 16 Neb 681, 683." Ballentineís Law Dictionary, page 530.

In "democracies" and so-called "democratic republics," slaves are given the false choice of choosing new masters. The old plantations can be seen as "political subdivisions" such as "cities," only smaller: "nations" have "presidents," "states" have "governors," "counties" have "commissioners," "cities" have "mayors" and plantations have masters.

"Government" is a group of men and women providing the service of protecting "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" at the barrel of a gun. We have no choice in accepting and paying for their wonderful services. Their services are so valuable weíre compelled to accept and pay for them. And non-political libertarians and voluntaryists are the extremists?

To keep this short, Iíll use statements from politicians themselves i.e., their sacred "law" thatís worshipped, revered and most important, feared. Compare the following:

"tax. A forced burden, charge, exaction, imposition or contribution assessed in accordance with some reasonable rule of apportionment by authority of a sovereign state upon the persons or property within its jurisdiction to provide for public revenue for the support of the government, the administration of the law, or the payment of public expenses. 51 AmJ1st Tax ß 3." Ballentineís Law Dictionary, page 1255.

"The organized use of threats, coercion, intimidation, and violence to compel the payment for actual or alleged services of arbitrary or excessive charges under the guise of membership dues, protection fees, royalties, or service rates. United States v McGlone (DC Pa) 19 F Supp 285, 286." Ballentineís Law Dictionary, page 1051.

The first is a "kinder, gentler" way of describing the second. Both are accurate descriptions of how men and women pretending to be "government" operate. I like the second one because itís actually the definition of "racketeer."

The government hoax is that "government," a racket, is legitimate and necessary. Thatís absurd. Maybe if you believe a service should be provided at the barrel of a gun then yes, youíd think "government" is legitimate and necessary.

The government hoax is exposed with nothing more than no service or product should to be provided at the barrel of a gun. If the service men and women doing business as a pretended "state" is so valuable, then people will voluntarily accept and pay for it.

Some attack this saying, "Whatís the alternative?!" Thatís easy:

Anything done under the guise of consent can be done by consent.

Men and women pretending to be "government" only have to do one thing different (hereís the "radical" "extremist" part): provide their services on a voluntary basis like everybody else.
__________________
Sui Juris Webmaster
"The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall."

THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE IN ANY CAPACITY WHATSOEVER
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2006, 04:31 AM
hardtoremember hardtoremember is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 138
Incredible

Marc Stevens is incredible and his vision is realistic. I applaud his writings and ideas.

HTR
__________________
All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed and third, it is accepted as self-evident.


- Arthur Schopenhauer Philosopher, 1788-1860
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2006, 04:47 AM
bridge of sighs's Avatar
bridge of sighs bridge of sighs is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 68
Tax

Title 27 CFR sec. 70.11 Meaning of terms. Enforced collection. Collection of taxes when a taxpayer neglects or refuses to pay voluntarily. Includes such administrative measures as liens and levy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2006, 06:10 AM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by bridge of sighs
Title 27 CFR sec. 70.11 Meaning of terms. Enforced collection. Collection of taxes when a taxpayer neglects or refuses to pay voluntarily. Includes such administrative measures as liens and levy.

They do put it out there in front of us, don't they?

We just have to learn the truth.

Henry Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2006, 07:54 PM
BOBT12's Avatar
BOBT12 BOBT12 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pennsylvania republic
Posts: 1,368
Government - What a Scam.

Quote:
The government hoax is probably the oldest, most pervasive and stubborn of hoaxes. Itís the belief in non-existent "states" and "nations" and that "government" is both legitimate and necessary. In the geographic area of the North American continent commonly referred to as the "United States," it's claimed only "government" can provide the service of protecting "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness." This is nonsense if only for the reason "government" has no duty to protect anyone and their property.
Emphasis added.

This, pretty much, sums up government today.
__________________
"Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."
-- Thomas Jefferson

It is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong. -Voltaire

All Rights Reserved.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2006, 06:37 AM
Lawyerdude Lawyerdude is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 69
Send a message via Yahoo to Lawyerdude
Dude, where's my Utah?

7586 Version 1.001
Dude, where’s my Utah? (Uncle Sam gave it to London’s Kennecott)
We need to take it back by eminent domain.
Saturday, April 8, 2006

This page is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7586.html
Kennecott copper in Utah. London based exploitation.
Take back our national resources!
Use eminent domain!

Lawyerdude says:
1. The copper industry in Utah should be declared a public utility.
2. The money ****heads in London should be sent packing; their
interest can be bought out by eminent domain.
3. The housing prices are way too high; this is why the
London folks continue to exploit there.

4. This is mere colonization/ exploitation.

5. Utah folks are dumbasses. The Mormon influence makes stupidity
acceptable there. They are shortsighted ****heads.

6. One of the problems of this country is that we give away the
wealth of this country. The federal government gives land to
foreigners like this mining company for pennies !
This same foreign government employs the ****heads from India
who come here and work in the patent department of the federal
government which they have totally ****ed up.

7. Why does this happen? People with too much power and not
enough ****ing sense. Corruption. Do the people of Utah have a
****ing clue?

8. There is no author listed for this story. Who would write such propaganda bull****? A builder? A developer? A bank? Oh, let’s see who is quoted:
A “said Keith L. Morey, manager for Kennecott's flagship Daybreak project, where just seven builders were chosen to help build the first town of 14,000 homes.
B. "It was a mixture of excitement and fear," Brad Wilson, president and chief executive of Destination Homes, said of his decision to sign on with Kennecott to help build Daybreak.

9. Why is no author listed? In self-promotional stories like this, these deceptive bastards write in the 3rd person. The story is often the produce of the people who are quoted. They deceive us by writing about themselves in the 3rd person - as though there were some author. This lulls us into thinking that we are reading objective news; in fact we are reading propaganda, in this case the happy talk of a promoter on the gravy train sending money to London.

Mega-suburb takes shape in Utah
Mining company builds community for half a million people

WEST JORDAN, Utah (AP) -- It's a development plan that will take more
than 50 years from start to finish. A string of "walkable"
communities, expected eventually to house half a million people, is
starting to rise on the nation's largest piece of privately owned land
next to a metropolis.

This mega-suburb, twice the size of San Francisco, will be the work of
a mining company, Kennecott Utah Copper Corp., which has no experience
in real-estate development.

The Utah company is a subsidiary of London-based Rio Tinto, a mining
multinational and avowed convert to environmentalism, which decided to
make a showcase out of its surplus Utah lands instead of just selling
them off for cookie-cutter subdivisions.

Home builders were skeptical when the Salt Lake valley's biggest
landowner laid out the plan for a 20-mile string of densely packed
communities framing the rural west side of Salt Lake County. The
communities would be laid out along a planned highway and light-rail
lines connecting to Salt Lake City.

Mining executives pitched the idea to some 50 builders. "A lot of them
rolled their eyes and walked away," said Keith L. Morey, manager for
Kennecott's flagship Daybreak project, where just seven builders were
chosen to help build the first town of 14,000 homes.

"It was a mixture of excitement and fear," Brad Wilson, president and
chief executive of Destination Homes, said of his decision to sign on
with Kennecott to help build Daybreak.

"We didn't know if this was something people would wrap their arms
around. It's so different -- the tiny lots and alley-loaded garages.
It was a risk, but at the end of the day we felt they knew what they
were doing," Wilson said.

Kennecott's whole plan calls for 162,800 houses in neighborhoods
mixing the wealthy and middle class in shared communities of gardens,
pocket parks and surrounding open space.

The so-called West Bench development -- the string of communities
along the base of a mountain range -- differs from other planned
communities by emphasizing connections to a larger metropolis.
Single ownership of huge tract creates opportunity

"It's part of a vision for how the whole region grows," said lead
planner Peter Calthorpe, a Berkeley, California, consultant who
designed the trendy redevelopment of Denver's old Stapleton Airport,
which is about the same size as Kennecott's Daybreak community.

Kennecott is developing the rolling foothills of its 144 square miles
of land, which ranks as the largest piece of land anywhere in the
United States that's under the control of a single, private owner and
next to a major metropolis.

Single ownership of the land "gives incredible control over
development and the execution of the plan," said Gary Hunt, a retired
executive for Irvine Co., which developed one of the country's first
master-planned communities, in California's Orange County, starting in
the 1960s. "In other parts of the country you don't have that kind of
opportunity."

At Daybreak's information pavilion, manager Barbara Breen greets
prospective buyers at a glass building with commanding views of the
Wasatch and Oquirrh mountains that frame the Salt Lake valley.

"We went on this incredible siege last summer, selling 40 houses a
week, so we ran out," she said. More than 800 houses have been sold so
far, half of them still under construction.
Kennecott: Enviromental problems have been solved

Daybreak was not without its environmental problems, a legacy of a
century of digging at nearby Bingham Mine, which is expected to keep
operating until at least 2018.

A small part of Daybreak was built over ponds that collected mining
runoff and heavy metals from 1936 to 1965. Kennecott scooped up 3
million square yards of contaminated soil and carried it back near the
mine.

Some buyers bluntly ask whether Daybreak would "glow in the dark or
something," said Peter F. McMahon, president of Kennecott Land Co. He
argued the Daybreak cleanup exceeded Environmental Protection Agency
standards.

"It's cleaner than a bunch of other parts of the valley," he said.

Kennecott is helping build a pair of reverse-osmosis filter plants to
clean tainted groundwater over the next 40 years, while providing
fresh tap water for the southwest part of the Salt Lake valley. It dug
other wells 300 feet deep to provide ground-source heating and cooling
for a new elementary school and community center and contributed
$400,000 to kick-start an environmental study of extending a
light-rail line from downtown Salt Lake City to Daybreak.

"It's a new business for Rio Tinto. Some people said, 'What are you
doing this for?'" McMahon said, pointing out that Kennecott has more
land than it will ever need for mining. "We have land in an area with
strong demographics and a strong economy. All that growth is heading
that way."

"Sustainable" development is a term McMahon and other Kennecott
executives often use to describe their venture. Daybreak, for example,
will contain all of its own runoff, using it for irrigation for native
grasses and 40 species of trees, said Greg L. Rasmussen, an engineer
and Kennecott's director of land development.
'Always wanted a front porch'

At Daybreak, every house will be within a five minute's walk of a park
on 37 miles of interconnecting trails, some lined with channel
streams. It will be easy to walk or bicycle to grocery and other shops
and restaurants in the village core.

Kennecott banned the use of aluminum siding and fake cobblestone
facades in favor of natural materials and insisted on rambling front
porches for most houses.

"My wife always wanted a front porch," said Craig Douglass, a
56-year-old software quality analyst for 3M Co., who moved from a
nearby subdivision, where he found his half-acre yard too large to
maintain.

At Daybreak, the couple bought a $273,000, 1,650-square-foot house
with "a nice small yard, and we're looking forward to all the
amenities" that will include a sailing lake, he said.

"The idea is these homes will appreciate in value because of their
quality and the amenities of the neighborhood," said Wilson, the
builder who has taken 200 orders so far and can't finish the houses
fast enough for his buyers.

Kennecott is selling lots to builders but can't control home prices,
which are rising with demand and range from less than $200,000 to more
than $800,000, depending on a menu of options the builders offer.

Wilson said Kennecott's first town is not only unique to Utah but the
country. He's toured many planned communities in other states but
adds, "I don't know anyone who has done it as well as Kennecott."
----------------------

Links for your Empowerment! Self help Litigation forms, instructions, cases, and samples.
1. How to Win. Overview. Getting started: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7260.html
2. Over 100 actual winning motions from 22 winning pro se litigators !

Last edited by Lawyerdude : 04-08-2006 at 06:38 AM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Text of public law 73-10 kgod999 UCC 87 02-11-2008 08:30 AM
Contractor's licenses?? Rory Success Stories 243 01-15-2008 05:56 AM
Marc Stevens Informational Tour logos Service Providers 4 05-29-2005 10:37 PM
From The Archives SKYGZR Taxation 0 07-10-2004 02:20 AM

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer