Private credit, public money

[RickA]

I am so pleased somebody else caught my gist. That is a tacit admission AndyK understands that FRNs pay for nothing, presuming he commented about removing, "...the order of..." from a check - leaving only "Pay to __________".

David, it's not only that, I'm curious to know if their participation has been triggered. Is there a concept or word that triggers that participation. Thats all

That is at the heart of this intensely interesting thread; the event is the taxable item - the event. You are fine to just use the public money to pay for something - the attorney seeks, as a collection agent, the event of placing and filling the order.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[David Merrill]

The event is endorsement or indorsement (same thing). Albeit if you are looking for triggers, words of art, citizen and resident come to mind. In Ensminger, the justices make no rebuttle to debunk mention on the record of the "resident scam". Traversal between the realms of private debt and public money is allegedly natural as breathing; however Congress has approved deposits into a bank account exceeding $1K in a year's time prima facie evidence of drawing on private debt? (According to the opening article.) I suppose what that means is I better figure a way to get the MP3 version of that text to you before you need to apply it.

Above somebody made inference to the allusion in the article that US notes are money. Only by de facto definition (according to the opening article). Notes are still notes and that means they are only money when redeemed so. I believe there is a major error in practicality in the article. The author indicates anybody may walk into a Federal Reserve Bank and trade their FRNs for equal amounts of coin, or public money. I may be wrong but the only United States Notes around are relics from the Kennedy Assassination. The author says that the Fed is required to keep US Notes handy for the informed few who demand public money. US Notes may be public money by definition but they are still notes. They are domestic emergency currency as opposed to foreign emergency currency. That is the model I prefer. But somebody on the board can go try it for us. And of course it would be fiercely patriotic to follow the recipe of demanding only public money, as prescribed, even if it turns out to be impracticable. Because if you get right down to where the rubber meets the road, D.Dog's DA sold him up the river for the collections process just the same as Congress has and is selling us up the river every day as chattel. They do that because as they perceive it, that is what the constituents want and desire.

Destroying the Fed as described above is going to be a bit rough. That is why I teach capital integration - a release valve system.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[RickA]

The event is endorsement or indorsement (same thing). Albeit if you are looking for triggers, words of art, citizen and resident come to mind.

Yes, for this specific instance, but I was looking into taking the time to try and find pattern(s), for the longer haul. Not only to see the participation having been triggered, but to see if their is a pattern to any of the usuall possible rebuttles.

These things may have been done, you may be doing it now with that technique you use.

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by RickA

Yes, for this specific instance, but I was looking into taking the time to try and find pattern(s), for the longer haul. Not only to see the participation having been triggered, but to see if their is a pattern to any of the usuall possible rebuttles.

These things may have been done, you may be doing it now with that technique you use.

Capital integration not only addresses the pseudonomania (applied misnomer) it is a comprehensive convolution of the attornment process. The conditioning replaces name, money and land with legal name, legal tender and real estate. I am still determined to get that MP3 file linked so Readers can load it into their cars and players while they go to work and such. I find it exciting because I tend to speak from the end of my journey in the hopes some of the Readers will get something out of what I say. The dichotomy of currency between private debt and public money described in the opening article models perfectly the alienation from the original estate of all three components name, money and land. Not only will letting the article sink into your comprehension snap a bunch of things about name into place from my Internet Yarn, but you will also utilize the same model (pattern) to comprehend Squirrel on the True Allodialism thread. He has given us all the key to owning property and defeating the presumption of tenancy.


Regards,

David Merrill.

P.S. Available soon... http://friends-n-family-research.inf...rve_System.mp3

[Cracker]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Thank you free_martha. Very informative. I will transcribe it into an audio file MP3 and send it to Admin for the Downloads or Articles section. That way people can listen during a commute or whatever.

P.S. The audio file:

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ate_Credit.zip

Winrar reports this file as corrupt, so it doesn't work.

.

[David Merrill]

Sorry: try this one in a little bit.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...rve_System.mp3

[esse]

Could we say that Debts=interests and the income tax is the tool utility which the government and the fed use to steal the fruits of our labour, energies, and the sweat of our forehead to increase their market of their make believe scam. But a good average mind control body politic because of their slave frame belief will much believe that they did a good deed about having given any contribution to any government services or programmes but we all know the empire of this rip-off of what is income tax is all about. I say as long as we are going to accept to sale our labour for any debt notes based on a criminal system we will still be the accessible merchandise by the way that we adhere the contract of the exchange of our labour to their debt money or notes.

The real financial sovereign is the one who will exchange is talents, energies, and the fruit of his labour for equitable value in return period. Or doing barter that is I think a good way to come back at a stage that the people could realize what really was equitable working and what it is a living truthfulness instead of trying to survive in a urban jungle where people are continuously trying get more money to pay a so called interest-debt a system that to a person to have his tree meal tree individuals have to get killed or dying being homeless or because they cannot feed them as well to survive.

Grace/Public Policy creates our exemption in the industrial society?

What the exemption is all about if we continuously accept to sale our labour for notes that doesn’t anything other than enriched the one who control our money and devastate the people of their wealth?


Destroying the Fed as described above is going to be a bit rough.

If we have some respect and love we will do what have to be done.

Truth will prevail, truth has to prevail. We will haul the liars, thieves, traitors and racketeers under the bright light of truth, exposing them, no matter who they are.


Show me the law that a spiritual human being needs or have the obligation to get a ss# to exchange his talents with another in the purpose to feed him to his survive?

[David Merrill]

Well said.

I watch the BBC and see images of strife around the world. It prods most people into promotion of the account deficit that keeps Americans' life quality up at the expense of others. To maintain a status quo Americans/Bankers have to maintain a police presence in the rest of the world and that is what requires Income Tax.

That is why the Redundant George Walker proposes a bunch of junk legislation about the immigration of Mexicans. Those laws are already all in place. We owe other nations around the world for stealing their substance - we owe them a better life and that is found here.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Well said.

I watch the BBC and see images of strife around the world.

It prods most people into promotion of the account deficit that keeps Americans' life quality up at the expense of others.

To maintain a status quo Americans/Bankers have to maintain a police presence in the rest of the world and that is what requires Income Tax.

That is why the Redundant George Walker proposes a bunch of junk legislation about the immigration of Mexicans.

Those laws are already all in place.

We owe other nations around the world for stealing their substance - we owe them a better life and that is found here.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Well spoken esse, and David Merrill

If we would quit the long established imperial doctrine of the "first fruits" of a "second" or "third world" nation's wealth belonging to "investors" rather than to the living human beings native on the land of nations whose resources we take to maintain the "life style of the rich and famous," perhaps those "immigrants" could afford to stay home--as that is where they want to be anyway.

This has been well known and well spoken by people with conscience and integrity here in this country for some time now.

[AndyK]

Originally Posted by mrg

Well spoken esse, and David Merrill

If we would quit the long established imperial doctrine of the "first fruits" of a "second" or "third world" nation's wealth belonging to "investors" rather than to the living human beings native on the land of nations whose resources we take to maintain the "life style of the rich and famous," perhaps those "immigrants" could afford to stay home--as that is where they want to be anyway.

This has been well known and well spoken by people with conscience and integrity here in this country for some time now.

How are the "second or third" class nations supposed to develop their resources without some form of (EVIL) investment?

And aren't the investors entitled to a reasonable return on their funds? Otherwise, why would they commit their OWN resources to another country -- out of the good of their hearts?

And what happens to the investors when the country decides to nationalize (take over without any compensation) the factories, businesses, and so on that people have spent their own money to build?

How would you feel it the United States government decided to nationalize companies here? What if the government took over all the automobile companies and decided to produce only the cars that they decided you needed?

Face it, capitalism (the investment of money with the expectation of a return on the investment) works and works very well.