Evidence of cover up by the judicial system

[Sharing Lights]

Part I


Indisputable Evidence of cover up by the judicial system,
preventing the due process of the true justice and protect those judges against whom, the evidence of corruption exists.

Later Post would be substantiated by direct links/scans within few days in order to assure the accuracy and validity of the information in the spirit of fairness and justice to all.

Disclaimer:

The allegations made, hereto, are based on direct-personal evidence: prima facie and can be substantiated by the records.

Fair opportunities have been extended to all parties to ratify the situation.

No acts of any violence are advocated or supported on either side.

The parties and those who claim to supervise their activity and scope of action have willfully failed to address the legitimate complaint of the wrongdoings of the judges.

No bona fide errors on their part exists and there is no evince to suggest such as the cover up is consistent and uniformed on all the levels that have been addressed.

The failure ratio for legal due process has been 100% so far.

The issue of the complain has consistently stated that the main focus remains the corruption against Pro Se Litigants in general and not to be viewed as the individual case(s) only.

Based on that, the request for the Due and Proper Investigation of the Corruption in the Civil Court of the State of New York: both Civil and Housing Part has been made to the pertinent Authorities.

The complain of the corruption has been submitted:

1) to the Judges in discussion instantly when the laws were violated;

2) to the Office of the Supervising Judge at least three times. (in person;)

3) by the zip code – proper District, to the Congressmen;

4) to the Senators;

5) to the Assemblymen;

6) to the Mayor;

7) to the Governor;

8) to the Department of Justice;

9) to the local DA Office (re: the Housing Judge – not Civil;)

10) to the Department of the Investigations of NY;

11) 10) has informed me that has passed the complaint to 12);

12) The Commission on Judicial Conduct of the State of NY;

13) GOP (for the reason to reinstate check and balances as the Civil Court of NY is comprised of over 90% Democrats-judges; therefore, involving the Republicans seemed to be a logical step.

They looked away with the same, amazing consistency as the Democrats.
I wonder now…

I thought they were better as made more sense via Republican ideas than Democrats, overall.

Yet, when it comes to judges, they become of bi-partisan support.

Now, they know what may unite them.)

to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part II

It seems that only the Attorney General Office was left out as I chose to leave one organization available if all, others fail, with an opportunity for the last available remedy left by standard process, except contacting the Office of the President.
Yet, the latest attempt by the Presidential Office of wiretapping/surveillance of the US Citizens has postponed my, such submission.

There is a song by Pink Floyd with the words, “is there are anybody out there?" (I add,) descent left, at all, on the Governmental level?

I, still, believe and they still prove others to be right, who have much less patience and tolerance.

I must admit, the facts are on their side so far.
I always admit as is.

Lord, please send one honest Judge, one for a start.

I am getting embarrassed now by the reality.

I can't lie to people, Lord. I must state the truth, otherwise how can they trust me or I myself?



All of the above has failed to address the issue - united default an all levels stated.

Few telephone conversations that have commenced, as I attempted to get a live response, have resulted in the secretarial verbal answer, “our xxxxx does not get involved with such matters. Sorry, we can not help you.”

My response was, “your xxxxx represents the District in which I am his/her Constituent.

He/she is directly responsible for this District as, being listed a Representative, elected by the People on promise to represent them in the area - zip code.

What did happen to the promises made during the election?

The secondary reply, from their office, was (as you guessed it, see the previous reply.)

The Commission on Judicial Conduct 12) wrote to me initially:

a) that it is in receipt of my complaint;

b) that it does not investigate the Housing Judges in NY.
I have received another letter from 12)

“The State Commission on Judicial Conduct has reviewed you letter of complaint dated xxxxx.

The Commission has asked me to advise you that it has dismissed the complaint.
Upon careful consideration, the Commission concluded that there was insufficient indication of judicial misconduct to justify judicial discipline.

Very truly your,
Jean M. Savanyu”

Before I contact the Attorney General, I may not state that corruption is spread on all the levels, and the rules of accuracy bind me to allege that is it is at the vicinity of about 90-95%, any, reasonable person maybe conclude that corruption of judges is actively protected by the pertinent Authorities.


to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part III


Such reasonable person may conclude that judges have, unusually, powerful grip on the Governmental Authorities and the People.

The Government in general cover up for judges by virtue of refusing their, direct duties for protecting the public at large and serving the interests of the real Justice, fail to investigate possible violations of law beyond "paper games" too often.



It may be concluded that judges have seized the legislative power in the Country and such seizure is Unconstitutional.

They control and direct - they direct and control!


The horror is that a judge who got away, so far, from being, truly, investigated as obviously he could not be since I have never submitted the evidence, yet, would use this letter from the JC and would make a public claim that he has been found not guilty and all charges were unsubstantiated.

God, the process didn't even take place, nothing took place except my warning that too much corruption is going on in this Court.
Something needs to be done and urgently.
I have evidence.
Let law take its due course.

That was the meaning.

Now, lies would be turned into a defense for this judge.

On top of that, he would become much more arrogant and more assured of his unaccountability.


As, except the 12) there we re no investigation at all, a reasonable person may conclude that the Authorities:

a) either are involved in the cover up

b) or assumed that there are no violations of laws

as Judges, by virtue of being honorable as the title proves that is demanded to be placed before the term “judge” are honorable indeed and no honorable judge can commit any violation.

As rules of fairness and accuracy demand a precise definition of “honorable” as the Government has decided, the judges are such definition is stated in the Post to come:

of course, it is obvious to any reasonable person that Judges, as they are honorable, can not, possibly, commit any act in discord with being honorable.
Well honor is honor, as all know the definition.
Why not go a step further and demnd of us to call judges "lovable?"

Love is a very postive feeling and word. Is it not?
What can be better?
Who can be better then our judges, particulalry when they hide behind the flags?
Let's put two and two together:

"our lovable, honarable justices."

Is it not true that propaganda is based on the same, false "philosophy?"

Use loud, colorful words that all can associate with, then, hide behind them.

"We, the Citizens,"
"we, the patriots,"
"fighting for our rights,"
"has been done for us, all..."

A reasonable person may, also, conclude that I or any one else, who dares to allege that any Judge is involved in corruption or any wrongdoing is presenting false information and is engaged in hostile acts against the innocent party - ”the honorable judges."

As obviously, that has been proved to the Authority as self-evident, under the current Statues, the judges have a right to sue any Civilian who dared to report allegedly dishonorable acts, while such scenario could not possibly be equal, when the tables are reversed, when that comes to suing or complaining vs. judges protected by the title of Nobility - honorable.

As I may not answer for ail the Civilians of the US, I would answer for myself (if, I, still, have such right granted to me by the honorable judges.)

Dear honorable judges and presiding justices and God appointed blessings to all,
Please do sue me…

Maybe, then, at least, the People would hear what and how you exercise your honor.

to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part IV

As per 12) one, small disclaimer.

“Dear members, sorry I must rewrite my ignorant wordings.

Dear, Honorable members of the Honorable Commission of Judicial Conduct of the State of NY,
I do not have enough words to describe how Honorable you are.
God bless you, all...

I am the person who asked the authorities to investigate the cases of corruption and violations of laws, concerning the Civil Court of NY both: Civil and Housing Division.

What I saw in the Court was a state of shock, as I thought I was either hallucinating or not in the US?

I realized that so many other Pro Se go through the same.
That is why I decided not to look away.

I hate complaining but as the Government always advocates to use legal means I tried to use such and look what happened?
Do they work, I wonder now?
Look what happened.
You made me wonder, while I am such an optimist.

You can't say I didn't try to folow your advice!

Most women wish all men were so hard as hard as I tried.
****** would become obsolete.
Obviously its not enough in case of judges.

What is enough, then?

Who can put these noble-honors back into the reality?


What is the Government teaching me, then?

I love to be a good, law abiding citizen but these people are not that good and not that law abiding at all!

If a child saw what I saw, he or she would say, they are "bad."

I witness how they, shamelessly, break laws right in one's face.
They have no fear at all.

They have fun, they hunt us - it's a game to them.
How far can they push that animal to them, called Pro Se?

One "honor" yelled at me, "how dare you tell me what the law is?" after she just broke that law, herself.
Alice Fisher-Rubin in wonderland...

She wants to run for the Supreme Court now as the Civil is not enough to her.

Can you imagine the damage she can do if I look away?

Yes, I dare. It is my, Constitutional right to dare to relay on law.
So I did.

What's wrong with that?

Did it work?

She just broke it and yelled at me in the process.
Then, she put the Court's guard on me through her clerk to make me leave so that I do not "disturb" peace.

Who was "disturbed" there in reality?
My composure is more than adequate.

Dear Government, you teach us not to look away, when crime is being committed.
Is it not true?

You, even, state the we become an accessory to crime, when witness it and do not report it.
Right?

I agree with you, I really do.
Once I follow your rules, look what you do?

All of your agencies and its employees, so far, have united in one effort - to protect the Honorable darlings.

Such friendship is to be envied.
Such bonds, almost love at first sight.

Suddenly no race, nationality matters - only to belong to the noble honor.

No wonder these attorn-eye-ye wan-to be judges so desperately.

Look what they gain?
And look what we loose?

And look who pays for all that?
We do, the taxpayers.

You are, then, in conspiracy against the People - us - as you teach us one thing and undermine what teach at the same time.

Such bad behavior.
Kids may get spanked for such.

What such judges and their supporters get?

Bribes, promotions, personal favors?

"Is is not sweet?" as the Church lady said so many times.

Interesting, interesting indeed.




to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part V

First, of all, I thank you honarable judges and your, run by you, judicial comission, for:

a) not shooting me

b) and not jailing me for such travesty as an allegation against honorable judges.

Thank you, as we all know, being dead is no fun at all, as well as, being jailed.

Your kindness and an extended opportunity to me to live and, still, breath fresh air as I am such, unworthy beings, who dares to seek justice, while does not have the title of “honorable” and is; therefore, dishonorable obviously.

I am overwhelmed by your kindness - it is such is a tear jerker.

I am running out of tissue now but not out of issue!

I do admit I do not have such title as “honorable” me and no one refers to me as such.
I do not get bribes and people do not get up in my presence.
I am probably so abnormal as that does not bother me at all!


I confess it all, my noble and Honorable inquisitors.

So, my dear, honorable judges, I need your help to rewrite the rules of logic and basic concept of philosophy, as I am confused now for real.

Obviously, I am by virtue of being dishonorable and incompetent person and who does not possesses such high logical and reasoning faculties as you do your honors am a serf and a peasant to your mastery.

So please update my comprehension skills of a humble peasant.

Please explain to me, the ignorant serf of the noble and honorable masters as, now, you convinced me that only Nobility or masters of Slaves can exercise such power and be unaccountable to all (except I have not found out re: the AG Attorney General process yet;) yes, please explain how:

1) Could you state how did you find insufficient indication of judicial misconduct when you stated previously that you do not investigate Housing Judges?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?


2) Forgive my ignorance and stupidity, as that should not be that difficult for you since you know I am dishonorable as do not have such title and; therefore; cannot be noble.

How can you investigate what you state you cannot investigate?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??

3) I admit, I am confused now, I mean deeply and, even, beyond that to the far reaches of the Universe.

4) My logic fails me.

I may be able to perceive matters pertaining to

spirit and soul,

trinity of the Solar Fire,

forces governing supernova explosions in depth of Space

and how electrons affect each other's field even moving apart,
but I cannot comprehend your depth at all.

5) Furthermore, how could you have any careful consideration and conclude anything if I have never submitted to you my evidence?

6) Yes, I repeat, I have never submitted any evidence to any Authority. I submitted a complaint where I stated that I have the direct evidence supported by the Court record of the corruption and violation of law.

7) I also asked where I could submit such evidence in the future so that law is to be followed.

8) Please, your honors, nobilities, and royal highnesses, forgive my stupidity but if you have never received any evidence as I have never sent such to you, how could you be engaged in 5) stated above?

9) being humbled by such wisdom and integrity as you have exhibited such in your, royal splendor, I am, being an unworthy non-honorable serf-slave or whatever you grant me (thank you for whatever your kind words may bestow upon my unworthy soul and body) ask you for an explanation, as I am lost beyond the ability to be found again.

10)
a) How the hell (pard me your honors, the heaven) you investigate what is not submitted?

As you have such wonderful sense of humor,
b) could you, please, mail me a copy of my evidence "submitted" to you upon which you ruled?

c) I am sure you can redefine the laws of physics. I am patiently awaiting, your honors. I even took my hat off to you ahead of time.

11) How the Hades (pard me the Eden) you calculate sufficiency or insufficiency when there is nothing to calculate since the evidence is placed with me and few other sources as you taught me to be extra careful when it comes to such honors as you are in case you may get too “funny?”

12) A sense of humor is a wonderful trait, that; why it was so funny that I copied and re-distributed the evidence as I have no clue what to expect for you all now?

13) Please forgive my cluelessness as my logic has failed me indeed.

ps. Is it possible, your Nobilities, investigating other Nobilities, that you simply mail the preprinted letters of denial just changing the names?

Just asking as I am incompetent in your logic.

Is it not true that not your, Royal, Bar Association but we, the People, taxpayers pay your salaries to do what you do against us?
Is it not funny, indeed?

The Government makes us pay you to abuse us.
A paradox indeed.

It is more of a miracle than resurrection.

What a job, what an adventure?!

to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part VI


You want us to call your honors and justices.
May I suggest you, your honors to look it up in a dictionary the term "antonym?"
Just for fun as you all have such amazing sense of humor indeed.

antonym


Antonyms, from the Greek anti ("opposite") and onoma ("name") are word pairs that are opposite in meaning, such as hot and cold, obese and skinny, and up and down. Words may have different antonyms, depending on the meaning. Both long and tall are antonyms of short. Antonyms are of three types:

Gradable antonyms are two ends of the spectrum (slow and fast) but can have variations.

Complementary antonyms are pairs that express absolute opposites, like mortal and immortal.

Relational antonyms are pairs in which one describes a relationship between two objects and the other describes the same relationship when the two objects are reversed, such as parent and child, teacher and student, or buy and sell.


Although the word antonym was only coined by philologists in the 19th century, such relationships are a fundamental part of a language, in contrast to synonyms, which are a result of history and drawing of fine distinctions, or homonyms, which are mostly etymological accidents or coincidences. A few words with two antonymous meanings may also be designated contronyms:

enjoin (to prohibit; to order)
fast (moving quickly; fixed firmly in place)
cleave (to split; to adhere)
Languages often have ways of creating antonyms as an easy extension of lexicon. An example is the English prefixes in- and un-. Unreal is the antonym of real and indocile is of docile.

I believe you, just issued a direct challenge to all the Pro Se and Suit Juris of the US.

I may not speak on behalf of all but I say this to you, you honors,
“I accept the challenge!”

The odds are not even at all, I know, they are not on my side. I know.

You have entrenched yourself so far and deeply that you are a fortress of corruption, particularly in New York. I know.

So, practically, all the Governmental Authorities enable you by their silence, you reign supreme. I know that. I can see that.

A typical venue is to complain about you to you or likes of you and that is a practically dead end street, I know.


As I am against the ruthless and defying any morals machine, I am faced virtually with a scenario of a civilian living during the World War II whose neighborhood was just bombarded by the German Luftwaffe. He writes to the generals of the Air Force,

“Dear generals, you just bombarded the neighborhood I live in, almost all houses are on fire or have been leveled with the ground.

Could, you, please, not bomb our neighborhood as only peaceful Civilians are there and only few houses are left.

Could you please preserve, at least those few?

I believe the Generals of the Luftwaffe would have responded as they always did.

Only the letter would have been attached to one of the biggest bombs on a wing of a warplane to be unleashed in the same neighborhood.

to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part VII

So, why do you, judges want that title of nobility and to be called Honorable so desperately?
If they are what is posted below, then can get away with anything indeed as are protected by the Lord himself!
Look what he attached to the meaning of "honor."


Let's see line by line.

Judges, judges, you want us, all, to belive that you are all of that:



hon•or•a•ble

adj.
1. Deserving or winning honor and respect: led an honorable life.

2. Bringing distinction or recognition: honorable service to one's nation.

3. Possessing and characterized by honor: an honorable person.

4. Consistent with honor or good name: followed the only honorable course of action.

5. Distinguished; illustrious: this honorable gathering of scholars.

6. Attended by marks of recognition and honor: received an honorable burial.

7. Honorable (Abbr. Hon.)

a. Used as a title of respect for certain high government officials: The Honorable Jane Doe, Associate Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.

b. Used as a courtesy title for the children of barons and viscounts and the younger sons of earls.

c. Used in the House of Commons as a title of respect when speaking of another member.
honorableness hon'or•a•ble•ness n.
honorably hon'or•a•bly adv.



Thesaurus
honorable
adjective

1. Deserving honor, respect, or admiration: admirable, commendable, creditable, deserving, estimable, exemplary, laudable, meritorious, praiseworthy, reputable, respectable, worthy. See good/bad, praise/blame, respect/contempt/standing, value/worthlessness/evaluation.

2. Having or marked by uprightness in principle and action: good, honest, incorruptible, righteous, true, upright, upstanding. Informal straight-shooting. Idioms: on theup-and-upup and up. See honest/dishonest.




Antonyms
honorable
adj
Definition: illustrious
Antonyms: deplorable

adj
Definition: morally correct
Antonyms: crooked, dishonorable



Devil's Dictionary
A cynical view of the world by Ambrose Bierce
honorable
adj.
Afflicted with an impediment in one's reach. In legislative bodies it is customary to mention all members as honorable; as, "the honorable gentleman is a scurvy cur."




honorable

Honest, upright, and sincere.

A graceful and honorable old age is the childhood of immorality. — Pindar (522?-443 BC)





The adjective honorable has 5 meanings:

Meaning #1: not disposed to cheat or defraud; not deceptive or fraudulent

Synonym: honest
Meaning #2: showing or characterized by honor and integrity

Synonym: honourable
Antonym: dishonorable (meaning #1)

Meaning #3: used as a title of respect
Synonym: honourable

Meaning #4: adhering to ethical and moral principles
Synonyms: ethical, honourable, moral

Meaning #5: deserving of esteem and respect
Synonyms: estimable, good, respectable


Wikipedia
The Honourable

The prefix The Honourable or The Honorable
(abbreviated to "The Hon." or formerly "The Hon'ble") is a title of quality attached to the names of certain classes of persons.
British usage


Entitlement

In the United Kingdom, all sons and daughters of viscounts and barons and the younger sons of earls are styled with this prefix. (The daughters and younger sons of dukes and marquesses and the daughters of earls have the higher style of Lord or Lady before their first names, and the eldest sons of dukes, marquesses and earls are known by one of their father or mother's subsidiary titles.)


The style is only a courtesy one, however, and on legal documents they are described as, for instance, John Smith, Esq., commonly called The Honourable John Smith. As the wives of sons of peers share the titles of their husbands, the wives of the sons of viscounts and barons and the younger sons of earls are known as, e.g., The Hon. Mrs John Smith.
Some persons are entitled to the prefix by virtue of their offices. Rules exist that allow certain individuals to keep the prefix The Honourable even after retirement.

• Judges of the High Court and other superior courts in the Commonwealth (if the judge is a knight, the style Sir John Smith is used socially instead of The Honourable Mr Justice Smith.);

• Members of executive councils (and by extension, cabinets);

• Members of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada;

• Members of legislative councils (or senates) where the legislature is bicameral; and

• Certain representatives of the Sovereign, e.g. Lieutenant-Governors of Canadian provinces.
Many corporate entities are also entitled to the style, for example:

• The Honourable the Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Parliament Assembled;

• The Honourable East India Company;

• The Honourable Artillery Company;

• The Honourable Society of the Inner Temple etc.

Usage
The style The Honourable is always written on envelopes (where it is usually abbreviated to The Hon), and formally elsewhere, in which case the style Mr or Esq. is omitted. In speech, however, The Honourable John Smith is referred to simply as Mr John Smith.
In the House of Commons and other lower houses of Parliament and other legislatures, members refer to each other as honourable members etc. out of courtesy, despite the fact that they are not entitled to the style in writing.

Where a person is entitled to the prefix The Right Honourable he will use this higher style instead of The Honourable.

American usage
In the United States, the prefix The Honorable is used for a large number of high ranking (and not so high ranking) government officials, within the following guidelines:

• Any person elected to any public office at any level of American government; or

• Any person appointed by the President to a position subject to Senate confirmation.

The term Your Honor as a spoken form of address is usually reserved for judges, justices, and magistrates (who are addressed as such when presiding in court). Some mayors, such as the Mayor of New York City are also given the title.

[Sharing Lights]

Part VIII

I suspect that because judges have so much accumulated power virtually given to them, (they coerced actually) they can use their knowledge of law and access to it outcome almost "blackmail" any, governmental official unless meet their match.

I believe they respect each others power and try not to infringe on each others paths.

That is why it's so tough to get anything done vs. judges.

They find ways to divide the sphere of influence by the territory so to say.

Ability of judges to issue decisions that are, practically, unchallenged is out of control.
Appeals involve their kind, once again.


No group of people should, ever, be given supreme control as dictatorship on some level would follow as the consequence.

Only individuals of truly, high moral standards and virtues with true and genuine Honor can handle such power.

This is the key:

Ironically, such people, never demand to call them "honors" or remove hats before them or demanding any other degrading human dignity activity.

They do not demand - period.


These people would earn their reputation by their reputation based on every day deeds and not on show of force and intimidating.

Any one who demands and forces respect out of you is a tyrant by that virtue instantly and infringes on your freedom.

True nobility is always humble in moments of peace and relentless in pursuit of true justice in moment of "war."

These are basic tests for what judges or any one with Authority stand for.

Only a very clever sociopath or psychopath can beat that test but they are much more rare, as the majority of judges are too blunt and arrogant to conceal or, even, consider how they are viewed by public.

They just don't give a damn.

I must add that the real dilemma is not judges but whoever gains power and how power is handled.

Common people who gain to such power too quickly often become tyrants themselves.

I would use a brief example.

I believe that on some Forum mentioned on this Website, the quest for power and control went so far that the Moderator, there, has began putting her, own Avatars on members she dislikes and attempting to present highly intelligent members as fools.

Such person may even criticize judges, while acting not any better than most of them.

Power is that Lord of the Rings...


By tomorrow, I would post the solution to Commission on Judicial Conduct as I believe that may be it.


to be continued

[Ice]

A judge that over steps the bounds of their authority by "breaking the law" is no longer a judge... but a private person.

Only in their "private capacity" did they act and can they be held accountable. It is referred to as "personal liability."

Therefore, you do not seek to initiate a claim against a judge -- because a judge can do no wrong. But, one who is no longer a judge by virture of their actions can be held accountable.

The claim is against the "man" -- not the "office".

Ice

[Sharing Lights]

The Commission's Mandate and History

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct is the state agency responsible for investigating complaints of misconduct against judges of the state unified court system and, where appropriate, determining to admonish, censure or remove from office those judges found to have engaged in unethical behavior.

All determinations are subject to review in the Court of Appeals, New York State's highest court.



Commission Profile

There are 11 Commission members, each serving a term of four years.

The Governor appoints four members,

the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals appoints three,
and each of the four leaders of the State Legislature appoints one.

The members serve part-time, without compensation.

The Commission elects one of its members to serve as chair.

The Commission appoints an Administrator and Counsel, who serves full-time and hires and directs the staff. The Commission's offices are located in New York City, Albany and Rochester.

In addition, the Commission is assisted by a lawyer who is the Clerk of the Commission.